Cargando…

The majority are not performing home-exercises correctly two weeks after their initial instruction—an assessor-blinded study

Introduction. Time-under-tension (TUT) reflects time under load during strength training and is a proxy of the total exercise dose during strength training. The purpose of this study was to investigate if young participants are able to reproduce TUT and exercise form after two weeks of unsupervised...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faber, Mathilde, Andersen, Malene H., Sevel, Claus, Thorborg, Kristian, Bandholm, Thomas, Rathleff, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4517955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26244112
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1102
_version_ 1782383268584226816
author Faber, Mathilde
Andersen, Malene H.
Sevel, Claus
Thorborg, Kristian
Bandholm, Thomas
Rathleff, Michael
author_facet Faber, Mathilde
Andersen, Malene H.
Sevel, Claus
Thorborg, Kristian
Bandholm, Thomas
Rathleff, Michael
author_sort Faber, Mathilde
collection PubMed
description Introduction. Time-under-tension (TUT) reflects time under load during strength training and is a proxy of the total exercise dose during strength training. The purpose of this study was to investigate if young participants are able to reproduce TUT and exercise form after two weeks of unsupervised exercises. Material and Methods. The study was an assessor-blinded intervention study with 29 participants. After an initial instruction, all participants were instructed to perform two weeks of home-based unsupervised shoulder abduction exercises three times per week with an elastic exercise band. The participants were instructed in performing an exercise with a predefined TUT (3 s concentric; 2 s isometric; 3 s eccentric; 2 s break) corresponding to a total of 240 s of TUT during three sets of 10 repetitions. After completing two weeks of unsupervised home exercises, they returned for a follow-up assessment of TUT and exercise form while performing the shoulder abduction exercise. A stretch sensor attached to the elastic band was used to measure TUT at baseline and follow-up. A physiotherapist used a pre-defined clinical observation protocol to determine if participants used the correct exercise form. Results. Fourteen of the 29 participants trained with the instructed TUT at follow-up (predefined target: 240 s ±8%). Thirteen of the 29 participants performed the shoulder abduction exercise with a correct exercise form. Seven of the 29 participants trained with the instructed TUT and exercise form at follow-up. Conclusion. The majority of participants did not use the instructed TUT and exercise form at follow-up after two weeks of unsupervised exercises. These findings emphasize the importance of clear and specific home exercise instructions if participants are to follow the given exercise prescription regarding TUT and exercise form as too many or too few exercise stimuli in relation to the initially prescribed amount of exercise most likely will provide a misinterpretation of the actual effect of any given specific home exercise intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4517955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45179552015-08-04 The majority are not performing home-exercises correctly two weeks after their initial instruction—an assessor-blinded study Faber, Mathilde Andersen, Malene H. Sevel, Claus Thorborg, Kristian Bandholm, Thomas Rathleff, Michael PeerJ Kinesiology Introduction. Time-under-tension (TUT) reflects time under load during strength training and is a proxy of the total exercise dose during strength training. The purpose of this study was to investigate if young participants are able to reproduce TUT and exercise form after two weeks of unsupervised exercises. Material and Methods. The study was an assessor-blinded intervention study with 29 participants. After an initial instruction, all participants were instructed to perform two weeks of home-based unsupervised shoulder abduction exercises three times per week with an elastic exercise band. The participants were instructed in performing an exercise with a predefined TUT (3 s concentric; 2 s isometric; 3 s eccentric; 2 s break) corresponding to a total of 240 s of TUT during three sets of 10 repetitions. After completing two weeks of unsupervised home exercises, they returned for a follow-up assessment of TUT and exercise form while performing the shoulder abduction exercise. A stretch sensor attached to the elastic band was used to measure TUT at baseline and follow-up. A physiotherapist used a pre-defined clinical observation protocol to determine if participants used the correct exercise form. Results. Fourteen of the 29 participants trained with the instructed TUT at follow-up (predefined target: 240 s ±8%). Thirteen of the 29 participants performed the shoulder abduction exercise with a correct exercise form. Seven of the 29 participants trained with the instructed TUT and exercise form at follow-up. Conclusion. The majority of participants did not use the instructed TUT and exercise form at follow-up after two weeks of unsupervised exercises. These findings emphasize the importance of clear and specific home exercise instructions if participants are to follow the given exercise prescription regarding TUT and exercise form as too many or too few exercise stimuli in relation to the initially prescribed amount of exercise most likely will provide a misinterpretation of the actual effect of any given specific home exercise intervention. PeerJ Inc. 2015-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4517955/ /pubmed/26244112 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1102 Text en © 2015 Faber et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Kinesiology
Faber, Mathilde
Andersen, Malene H.
Sevel, Claus
Thorborg, Kristian
Bandholm, Thomas
Rathleff, Michael
The majority are not performing home-exercises correctly two weeks after their initial instruction—an assessor-blinded study
title The majority are not performing home-exercises correctly two weeks after their initial instruction—an assessor-blinded study
title_full The majority are not performing home-exercises correctly two weeks after their initial instruction—an assessor-blinded study
title_fullStr The majority are not performing home-exercises correctly two weeks after their initial instruction—an assessor-blinded study
title_full_unstemmed The majority are not performing home-exercises correctly two weeks after their initial instruction—an assessor-blinded study
title_short The majority are not performing home-exercises correctly two weeks after their initial instruction—an assessor-blinded study
title_sort majority are not performing home-exercises correctly two weeks after their initial instruction—an assessor-blinded study
topic Kinesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4517955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26244112
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1102
work_keys_str_mv AT fabermathilde themajorityarenotperforminghomeexercisescorrectlytwoweeksaftertheirinitialinstructionanassessorblindedstudy
AT andersenmaleneh themajorityarenotperforminghomeexercisescorrectlytwoweeksaftertheirinitialinstructionanassessorblindedstudy
AT sevelclaus themajorityarenotperforminghomeexercisescorrectlytwoweeksaftertheirinitialinstructionanassessorblindedstudy
AT thorborgkristian themajorityarenotperforminghomeexercisescorrectlytwoweeksaftertheirinitialinstructionanassessorblindedstudy
AT bandholmthomas themajorityarenotperforminghomeexercisescorrectlytwoweeksaftertheirinitialinstructionanassessorblindedstudy
AT rathleffmichael themajorityarenotperforminghomeexercisescorrectlytwoweeksaftertheirinitialinstructionanassessorblindedstudy
AT fabermathilde majorityarenotperforminghomeexercisescorrectlytwoweeksaftertheirinitialinstructionanassessorblindedstudy
AT andersenmaleneh majorityarenotperforminghomeexercisescorrectlytwoweeksaftertheirinitialinstructionanassessorblindedstudy
AT sevelclaus majorityarenotperforminghomeexercisescorrectlytwoweeksaftertheirinitialinstructionanassessorblindedstudy
AT thorborgkristian majorityarenotperforminghomeexercisescorrectlytwoweeksaftertheirinitialinstructionanassessorblindedstudy
AT bandholmthomas majorityarenotperforminghomeexercisescorrectlytwoweeksaftertheirinitialinstructionanassessorblindedstudy
AT rathleffmichael majorityarenotperforminghomeexercisescorrectlytwoweeksaftertheirinitialinstructionanassessorblindedstudy