Ultrasound guided Deep Vein cannulation: “Perpendicular Insertion Technique (PIT)”, an edge over “Conventional Insertion Technique (CIT)”

INTRODUCTION: The use of ultrasound imaging before or during vascular cannulation greatly improves first-pass success and reduces complications, but this skill must then be combined with manual dexterity to perform the three dimensional (3D) procedure of placing a catheter into the deep veins while...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jarwani, Bhavesh S, Shah, Harsh, Shah, Aharnish, Madariya, Malhar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4520028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229298
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.160720
_version_ 1782383600325361664
author Jarwani, Bhavesh S
Shah, Harsh
Shah, Aharnish
Madariya, Malhar
author_facet Jarwani, Bhavesh S
Shah, Harsh
Shah, Aharnish
Madariya, Malhar
author_sort Jarwani, Bhavesh S
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The use of ultrasound imaging before or during vascular cannulation greatly improves first-pass success and reduces complications, but this skill must then be combined with manual dexterity to perform the three dimensional (3D) procedure of placing a catheter into the deep veins while analyzing the 2D images. Hence this study is an attempt to still decrease the above mentioned limitation of guided deep vein cannulation by slight modification in the insertion technique. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Aims to compare the ultrasound guided deep vein cannulation by conventional insertion technique(CIT) v/s ultrasound guided perpendicular insertion technique (PIT). Main comparison parameters here are number of attempts required, time taken for successful insertion, vessel counter puncture, arterial puncture and other known mechanical complications of deep venous cannulation. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Prospective, non randomized cross sectional study, done over 200 patients in two arms. Data-analysed by epi2k and state-9 software. RESULTS: Total number of insertions were 64 by CIT v/s 136 by the PIT. Mean of number of attempts required were 1.918 with the CIT v/s 1.106 for the PIT method. Mean of time of cannulation was 78.62 + 18 sec with CIT while it was 66.98 + 12 sec for PIT and this was statistically significant(P = 0.041). Incidence of vessel counter-puncture was much lower in PIT as compared to CIT (6.1 % v/s 16.2%). 5.9% cannulation done by CIT had arterial puncture v/s 0.8% with the PIT. Not a single episode of any other mechanical complications with either of the method. CONCLUSION: USG guided perpendicular method is less time consuming, less number of attempts are required and there are less chances of arterial picture or vessel counter puncture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4520028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45200282015-07-30 Ultrasound guided Deep Vein cannulation: “Perpendicular Insertion Technique (PIT)”, an edge over “Conventional Insertion Technique (CIT)” Jarwani, Bhavesh S Shah, Harsh Shah, Aharnish Madariya, Malhar J Emerg Trauma Shock Original Article INTRODUCTION: The use of ultrasound imaging before or during vascular cannulation greatly improves first-pass success and reduces complications, but this skill must then be combined with manual dexterity to perform the three dimensional (3D) procedure of placing a catheter into the deep veins while analyzing the 2D images. Hence this study is an attempt to still decrease the above mentioned limitation of guided deep vein cannulation by slight modification in the insertion technique. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Aims to compare the ultrasound guided deep vein cannulation by conventional insertion technique(CIT) v/s ultrasound guided perpendicular insertion technique (PIT). Main comparison parameters here are number of attempts required, time taken for successful insertion, vessel counter puncture, arterial puncture and other known mechanical complications of deep venous cannulation. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Prospective, non randomized cross sectional study, done over 200 patients in two arms. Data-analysed by epi2k and state-9 software. RESULTS: Total number of insertions were 64 by CIT v/s 136 by the PIT. Mean of number of attempts required were 1.918 with the CIT v/s 1.106 for the PIT method. Mean of time of cannulation was 78.62 + 18 sec with CIT while it was 66.98 + 12 sec for PIT and this was statistically significant(P = 0.041). Incidence of vessel counter-puncture was much lower in PIT as compared to CIT (6.1 % v/s 16.2%). 5.9% cannulation done by CIT had arterial puncture v/s 0.8% with the PIT. Not a single episode of any other mechanical complications with either of the method. CONCLUSION: USG guided perpendicular method is less time consuming, less number of attempts are required and there are less chances of arterial picture or vessel counter puncture. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4520028/ /pubmed/26229298 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.160720 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jarwani, Bhavesh S
Shah, Harsh
Shah, Aharnish
Madariya, Malhar
Ultrasound guided Deep Vein cannulation: “Perpendicular Insertion Technique (PIT)”, an edge over “Conventional Insertion Technique (CIT)”
title Ultrasound guided Deep Vein cannulation: “Perpendicular Insertion Technique (PIT)”, an edge over “Conventional Insertion Technique (CIT)”
title_full Ultrasound guided Deep Vein cannulation: “Perpendicular Insertion Technique (PIT)”, an edge over “Conventional Insertion Technique (CIT)”
title_fullStr Ultrasound guided Deep Vein cannulation: “Perpendicular Insertion Technique (PIT)”, an edge over “Conventional Insertion Technique (CIT)”
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound guided Deep Vein cannulation: “Perpendicular Insertion Technique (PIT)”, an edge over “Conventional Insertion Technique (CIT)”
title_short Ultrasound guided Deep Vein cannulation: “Perpendicular Insertion Technique (PIT)”, an edge over “Conventional Insertion Technique (CIT)”
title_sort ultrasound guided deep vein cannulation: “perpendicular insertion technique (pit)”, an edge over “conventional insertion technique (cit)”
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4520028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229298
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.160720
work_keys_str_mv AT jarwanibhaveshs ultrasoundguideddeepveincannulationperpendicularinsertiontechniquepitanedgeoverconventionalinsertiontechniquecit
AT shahharsh ultrasoundguideddeepveincannulationperpendicularinsertiontechniquepitanedgeoverconventionalinsertiontechniquecit
AT shahaharnish ultrasoundguideddeepveincannulationperpendicularinsertiontechniquepitanedgeoverconventionalinsertiontechniquecit
AT madariyamalhar ultrasoundguideddeepveincannulationperpendicularinsertiontechniquepitanedgeoverconventionalinsertiontechniquecit