Ultrasound guided Deep Vein cannulation: “Perpendicular Insertion Technique (PIT)”, an edge over “Conventional Insertion Technique (CIT)”
INTRODUCTION: The use of ultrasound imaging before or during vascular cannulation greatly improves first-pass success and reduces complications, but this skill must then be combined with manual dexterity to perform the three dimensional (3D) procedure of placing a catheter into the deep veins while...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4520028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229298 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.160720 |
_version_ | 1782383600325361664 |
---|---|
author | Jarwani, Bhavesh S Shah, Harsh Shah, Aharnish Madariya, Malhar |
author_facet | Jarwani, Bhavesh S Shah, Harsh Shah, Aharnish Madariya, Malhar |
author_sort | Jarwani, Bhavesh S |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The use of ultrasound imaging before or during vascular cannulation greatly improves first-pass success and reduces complications, but this skill must then be combined with manual dexterity to perform the three dimensional (3D) procedure of placing a catheter into the deep veins while analyzing the 2D images. Hence this study is an attempt to still decrease the above mentioned limitation of guided deep vein cannulation by slight modification in the insertion technique. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Aims to compare the ultrasound guided deep vein cannulation by conventional insertion technique(CIT) v/s ultrasound guided perpendicular insertion technique (PIT). Main comparison parameters here are number of attempts required, time taken for successful insertion, vessel counter puncture, arterial puncture and other known mechanical complications of deep venous cannulation. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Prospective, non randomized cross sectional study, done over 200 patients in two arms. Data-analysed by epi2k and state-9 software. RESULTS: Total number of insertions were 64 by CIT v/s 136 by the PIT. Mean of number of attempts required were 1.918 with the CIT v/s 1.106 for the PIT method. Mean of time of cannulation was 78.62 + 18 sec with CIT while it was 66.98 + 12 sec for PIT and this was statistically significant(P = 0.041). Incidence of vessel counter-puncture was much lower in PIT as compared to CIT (6.1 % v/s 16.2%). 5.9% cannulation done by CIT had arterial puncture v/s 0.8% with the PIT. Not a single episode of any other mechanical complications with either of the method. CONCLUSION: USG guided perpendicular method is less time consuming, less number of attempts are required and there are less chances of arterial picture or vessel counter puncture. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4520028 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45200282015-07-30 Ultrasound guided Deep Vein cannulation: “Perpendicular Insertion Technique (PIT)”, an edge over “Conventional Insertion Technique (CIT)” Jarwani, Bhavesh S Shah, Harsh Shah, Aharnish Madariya, Malhar J Emerg Trauma Shock Original Article INTRODUCTION: The use of ultrasound imaging before or during vascular cannulation greatly improves first-pass success and reduces complications, but this skill must then be combined with manual dexterity to perform the three dimensional (3D) procedure of placing a catheter into the deep veins while analyzing the 2D images. Hence this study is an attempt to still decrease the above mentioned limitation of guided deep vein cannulation by slight modification in the insertion technique. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Aims to compare the ultrasound guided deep vein cannulation by conventional insertion technique(CIT) v/s ultrasound guided perpendicular insertion technique (PIT). Main comparison parameters here are number of attempts required, time taken for successful insertion, vessel counter puncture, arterial puncture and other known mechanical complications of deep venous cannulation. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Prospective, non randomized cross sectional study, done over 200 patients in two arms. Data-analysed by epi2k and state-9 software. RESULTS: Total number of insertions were 64 by CIT v/s 136 by the PIT. Mean of number of attempts required were 1.918 with the CIT v/s 1.106 for the PIT method. Mean of time of cannulation was 78.62 + 18 sec with CIT while it was 66.98 + 12 sec for PIT and this was statistically significant(P = 0.041). Incidence of vessel counter-puncture was much lower in PIT as compared to CIT (6.1 % v/s 16.2%). 5.9% cannulation done by CIT had arterial puncture v/s 0.8% with the PIT. Not a single episode of any other mechanical complications with either of the method. CONCLUSION: USG guided perpendicular method is less time consuming, less number of attempts are required and there are less chances of arterial picture or vessel counter puncture. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4520028/ /pubmed/26229298 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.160720 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jarwani, Bhavesh S Shah, Harsh Shah, Aharnish Madariya, Malhar Ultrasound guided Deep Vein cannulation: “Perpendicular Insertion Technique (PIT)”, an edge over “Conventional Insertion Technique (CIT)” |
title | Ultrasound guided Deep Vein cannulation: “Perpendicular Insertion Technique (PIT)”, an edge over “Conventional Insertion Technique (CIT)” |
title_full | Ultrasound guided Deep Vein cannulation: “Perpendicular Insertion Technique (PIT)”, an edge over “Conventional Insertion Technique (CIT)” |
title_fullStr | Ultrasound guided Deep Vein cannulation: “Perpendicular Insertion Technique (PIT)”, an edge over “Conventional Insertion Technique (CIT)” |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultrasound guided Deep Vein cannulation: “Perpendicular Insertion Technique (PIT)”, an edge over “Conventional Insertion Technique (CIT)” |
title_short | Ultrasound guided Deep Vein cannulation: “Perpendicular Insertion Technique (PIT)”, an edge over “Conventional Insertion Technique (CIT)” |
title_sort | ultrasound guided deep vein cannulation: “perpendicular insertion technique (pit)”, an edge over “conventional insertion technique (cit)” |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4520028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229298 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.160720 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jarwanibhaveshs ultrasoundguideddeepveincannulationperpendicularinsertiontechniquepitanedgeoverconventionalinsertiontechniquecit AT shahharsh ultrasoundguideddeepveincannulationperpendicularinsertiontechniquepitanedgeoverconventionalinsertiontechniquecit AT shahaharnish ultrasoundguideddeepveincannulationperpendicularinsertiontechniquepitanedgeoverconventionalinsertiontechniquecit AT madariyamalhar ultrasoundguideddeepveincannulationperpendicularinsertiontechniquepitanedgeoverconventionalinsertiontechniquecit |