Cargando…

Self-report measures of executive functioning are a determinant of academic performance in first-year students at a university of applied sciences

Recent studies in late adolescents (age 17+) show that brain development may proceed till around the 25th year of age. This implies that study performance in higher education could be dependent upon the stage of brain maturation and neuropsychological development. Individual differences in developme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baars, Maria A. E., Nije Bijvank, Marije, Tonnaer, Geertje H., Jolles, Jelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4525669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26300823
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01131
_version_ 1782384344466194432
author Baars, Maria A. E.
Nije Bijvank, Marije
Tonnaer, Geertje H.
Jolles, Jelle
author_facet Baars, Maria A. E.
Nije Bijvank, Marije
Tonnaer, Geertje H.
Jolles, Jelle
author_sort Baars, Maria A. E.
collection PubMed
description Recent studies in late adolescents (age 17+) show that brain development may proceed till around the 25th year of age. This implies that study performance in higher education could be dependent upon the stage of brain maturation and neuropsychological development. Individual differences in development of neuropsychological skills may thus have a substantial influence on the outcome of the educational process. This hypothesis was evaluated in a large survey of 1760 first-year students at a University of Applied Sciences, of which 1332 are included in the current analyses. This was because of their fit within the age range we pre-set (17–20 years' old at start of studies). Student characteristics and three behavioral ratings of executive functioning (EF) were evaluated with regard to their influence on academic performance. Self-report measures were used: self-reported attention, planning, and self-control and self-monitoring. Results showed that students with better self-reported EF at the start of the first year of their studies obtained more study credits at the end of that year than students with a lower EF self-rating. The correlation between self-control and self-monitoring on the one hand, and study progress on the other, appeared to differ for male and female students and to be influenced by the level of prior education. The results of this large-scale study could have practical relevance. The profound individual differences between students may at least partly be a consequence of their stage of development as an adolescent. Students who show lower levels of attention control, planning, and self-control/self-monitoring can be expected to have a problem in study planning and study progress monitoring and hence study progress. The findings imply that interventions directed at the training of these (executive) functions should be developed and used in higher education in order to improve academic achievement, learning attitude, and motivation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4525669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45256692015-08-21 Self-report measures of executive functioning are a determinant of academic performance in first-year students at a university of applied sciences Baars, Maria A. E. Nije Bijvank, Marije Tonnaer, Geertje H. Jolles, Jelle Front Psychol Psychology Recent studies in late adolescents (age 17+) show that brain development may proceed till around the 25th year of age. This implies that study performance in higher education could be dependent upon the stage of brain maturation and neuropsychological development. Individual differences in development of neuropsychological skills may thus have a substantial influence on the outcome of the educational process. This hypothesis was evaluated in a large survey of 1760 first-year students at a University of Applied Sciences, of which 1332 are included in the current analyses. This was because of their fit within the age range we pre-set (17–20 years' old at start of studies). Student characteristics and three behavioral ratings of executive functioning (EF) were evaluated with regard to their influence on academic performance. Self-report measures were used: self-reported attention, planning, and self-control and self-monitoring. Results showed that students with better self-reported EF at the start of the first year of their studies obtained more study credits at the end of that year than students with a lower EF self-rating. The correlation between self-control and self-monitoring on the one hand, and study progress on the other, appeared to differ for male and female students and to be influenced by the level of prior education. The results of this large-scale study could have practical relevance. The profound individual differences between students may at least partly be a consequence of their stage of development as an adolescent. Students who show lower levels of attention control, planning, and self-control/self-monitoring can be expected to have a problem in study planning and study progress monitoring and hence study progress. The findings imply that interventions directed at the training of these (executive) functions should be developed and used in higher education in order to improve academic achievement, learning attitude, and motivation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4525669/ /pubmed/26300823 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01131 Text en Copyright © 2015 Baars, Nije Bijvank, Tonnaer and Jolles. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Baars, Maria A. E.
Nije Bijvank, Marije
Tonnaer, Geertje H.
Jolles, Jelle
Self-report measures of executive functioning are a determinant of academic performance in first-year students at a university of applied sciences
title Self-report measures of executive functioning are a determinant of academic performance in first-year students at a university of applied sciences
title_full Self-report measures of executive functioning are a determinant of academic performance in first-year students at a university of applied sciences
title_fullStr Self-report measures of executive functioning are a determinant of academic performance in first-year students at a university of applied sciences
title_full_unstemmed Self-report measures of executive functioning are a determinant of academic performance in first-year students at a university of applied sciences
title_short Self-report measures of executive functioning are a determinant of academic performance in first-year students at a university of applied sciences
title_sort self-report measures of executive functioning are a determinant of academic performance in first-year students at a university of applied sciences
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4525669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26300823
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01131
work_keys_str_mv AT baarsmariaae selfreportmeasuresofexecutivefunctioningareadeterminantofacademicperformanceinfirstyearstudentsatauniversityofappliedsciences
AT nijebijvankmarije selfreportmeasuresofexecutivefunctioningareadeterminantofacademicperformanceinfirstyearstudentsatauniversityofappliedsciences
AT tonnaergeertjeh selfreportmeasuresofexecutivefunctioningareadeterminantofacademicperformanceinfirstyearstudentsatauniversityofappliedsciences
AT jollesjelle selfreportmeasuresofexecutivefunctioningareadeterminantofacademicperformanceinfirstyearstudentsatauniversityofappliedsciences