Cargando…
Bisulfite Conversion of DNA: Performance Comparison of Different Kits and Methylation Quantitation of Epigenetic Biomarkers that Have the Potential to Be Used in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing
INTRODUCTION: Epigenetic alterations, including DNA methylation, play an important role in the regulation of gene expression. Several methods exist for evaluating DNA methylation, but bisulfite sequencing remains the gold standard by which base-pair resolution of CpG methylation is achieved. The cha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4527772/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26247357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135058 |
_version_ | 1782384614352879616 |
---|---|
author | Leontiou, Chrysanthia A. Hadjidaniel, Michael D. Mina, Petros Antoniou, Pavlos Ioannides, Marios Patsalis, Philippos C. |
author_facet | Leontiou, Chrysanthia A. Hadjidaniel, Michael D. Mina, Petros Antoniou, Pavlos Ioannides, Marios Patsalis, Philippos C. |
author_sort | Leontiou, Chrysanthia A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Epigenetic alterations, including DNA methylation, play an important role in the regulation of gene expression. Several methods exist for evaluating DNA methylation, but bisulfite sequencing remains the gold standard by which base-pair resolution of CpG methylation is achieved. The challenge of the method is that the desired outcome (conversion of unmethylated cytosines) positively correlates with the undesired side effects (DNA degradation and inappropriate conversion), thus several commercial kits try to adjust a balance between the two. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of four bisulfite conversion kits [Premium Bisulfite kit (Diagenode), EpiTect Bisulfite kit (Qiagen), MethylEdge Bisulfite Conversion System (Promega) and BisulFlash DNA Modification kit (Epigentek)] regarding conversion efficiency, DNA degradation and conversion specificity. METHODS: Performance was tested by combining fully methylated and fully unmethylated λ-DNA controls in a series of spikes by means of Sanger sequencing (0%, 25%, 50% and 100% methylated spikes) and Next-Generation Sequencing (0%, 3%, 5%, 7%, 10%, 25%, 50% and 100% methylated spikes). We also studied the methylation status of two of our previously published differentially methylated regions (DMRs) at base resolution by using spikes of chorionic villus sample in whole blood. RESULTS: The kits studied showed different but comparable results regarding DNA degradation, conversion efficiency and conversion specificity. However, the best performance was observed with the MethylEdge Bisulfite Conversion System (Promega) followed by the Premium Bisulfite kit (Diagenode). The DMRs, EP6 and EP10, were confirmed to be hypermethylated in the CVS and hypomethylated in whole blood. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the MethylEdge Bisulfite Conversion System (Promega) was shown to have the best performance among the kits. In addition, the methylation level of two of our DMRs, EP6 and EP10, was confirmed. Finally, we showed that bisulfite amplicon sequencing is a suitable approach for methylation analysis of targeted regions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4527772 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45277722015-08-12 Bisulfite Conversion of DNA: Performance Comparison of Different Kits and Methylation Quantitation of Epigenetic Biomarkers that Have the Potential to Be Used in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing Leontiou, Chrysanthia A. Hadjidaniel, Michael D. Mina, Petros Antoniou, Pavlos Ioannides, Marios Patsalis, Philippos C. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Epigenetic alterations, including DNA methylation, play an important role in the regulation of gene expression. Several methods exist for evaluating DNA methylation, but bisulfite sequencing remains the gold standard by which base-pair resolution of CpG methylation is achieved. The challenge of the method is that the desired outcome (conversion of unmethylated cytosines) positively correlates with the undesired side effects (DNA degradation and inappropriate conversion), thus several commercial kits try to adjust a balance between the two. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of four bisulfite conversion kits [Premium Bisulfite kit (Diagenode), EpiTect Bisulfite kit (Qiagen), MethylEdge Bisulfite Conversion System (Promega) and BisulFlash DNA Modification kit (Epigentek)] regarding conversion efficiency, DNA degradation and conversion specificity. METHODS: Performance was tested by combining fully methylated and fully unmethylated λ-DNA controls in a series of spikes by means of Sanger sequencing (0%, 25%, 50% and 100% methylated spikes) and Next-Generation Sequencing (0%, 3%, 5%, 7%, 10%, 25%, 50% and 100% methylated spikes). We also studied the methylation status of two of our previously published differentially methylated regions (DMRs) at base resolution by using spikes of chorionic villus sample in whole blood. RESULTS: The kits studied showed different but comparable results regarding DNA degradation, conversion efficiency and conversion specificity. However, the best performance was observed with the MethylEdge Bisulfite Conversion System (Promega) followed by the Premium Bisulfite kit (Diagenode). The DMRs, EP6 and EP10, were confirmed to be hypermethylated in the CVS and hypomethylated in whole blood. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the MethylEdge Bisulfite Conversion System (Promega) was shown to have the best performance among the kits. In addition, the methylation level of two of our DMRs, EP6 and EP10, was confirmed. Finally, we showed that bisulfite amplicon sequencing is a suitable approach for methylation analysis of targeted regions. Public Library of Science 2015-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4527772/ /pubmed/26247357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135058 Text en © 2015 Leontiou et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Leontiou, Chrysanthia A. Hadjidaniel, Michael D. Mina, Petros Antoniou, Pavlos Ioannides, Marios Patsalis, Philippos C. Bisulfite Conversion of DNA: Performance Comparison of Different Kits and Methylation Quantitation of Epigenetic Biomarkers that Have the Potential to Be Used in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing |
title | Bisulfite Conversion of DNA: Performance Comparison of Different Kits and Methylation Quantitation of Epigenetic Biomarkers that Have the Potential to Be Used in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing |
title_full | Bisulfite Conversion of DNA: Performance Comparison of Different Kits and Methylation Quantitation of Epigenetic Biomarkers that Have the Potential to Be Used in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing |
title_fullStr | Bisulfite Conversion of DNA: Performance Comparison of Different Kits and Methylation Quantitation of Epigenetic Biomarkers that Have the Potential to Be Used in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing |
title_full_unstemmed | Bisulfite Conversion of DNA: Performance Comparison of Different Kits and Methylation Quantitation of Epigenetic Biomarkers that Have the Potential to Be Used in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing |
title_short | Bisulfite Conversion of DNA: Performance Comparison of Different Kits and Methylation Quantitation of Epigenetic Biomarkers that Have the Potential to Be Used in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing |
title_sort | bisulfite conversion of dna: performance comparison of different kits and methylation quantitation of epigenetic biomarkers that have the potential to be used in non-invasive prenatal testing |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4527772/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26247357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135058 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leontiouchrysanthiaa bisulfiteconversionofdnaperformancecomparisonofdifferentkitsandmethylationquantitationofepigeneticbiomarkersthathavethepotentialtobeusedinnoninvasiveprenataltesting AT hadjidanielmichaeld bisulfiteconversionofdnaperformancecomparisonofdifferentkitsandmethylationquantitationofepigeneticbiomarkersthathavethepotentialtobeusedinnoninvasiveprenataltesting AT minapetros bisulfiteconversionofdnaperformancecomparisonofdifferentkitsandmethylationquantitationofepigeneticbiomarkersthathavethepotentialtobeusedinnoninvasiveprenataltesting AT antonioupavlos bisulfiteconversionofdnaperformancecomparisonofdifferentkitsandmethylationquantitationofepigeneticbiomarkersthathavethepotentialtobeusedinnoninvasiveprenataltesting AT ioannidesmarios bisulfiteconversionofdnaperformancecomparisonofdifferentkitsandmethylationquantitationofepigeneticbiomarkersthathavethepotentialtobeusedinnoninvasiveprenataltesting AT patsalisphilipposc bisulfiteconversionofdnaperformancecomparisonofdifferentkitsandmethylationquantitationofepigeneticbiomarkersthathavethepotentialtobeusedinnoninvasiveprenataltesting |