Cargando…

Bisulfite Conversion of DNA: Performance Comparison of Different Kits and Methylation Quantitation of Epigenetic Biomarkers that Have the Potential to Be Used in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing

INTRODUCTION: Epigenetic alterations, including DNA methylation, play an important role in the regulation of gene expression. Several methods exist for evaluating DNA methylation, but bisulfite sequencing remains the gold standard by which base-pair resolution of CpG methylation is achieved. The cha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leontiou, Chrysanthia A., Hadjidaniel, Michael D., Mina, Petros, Antoniou, Pavlos, Ioannides, Marios, Patsalis, Philippos C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4527772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26247357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135058
_version_ 1782384614352879616
author Leontiou, Chrysanthia A.
Hadjidaniel, Michael D.
Mina, Petros
Antoniou, Pavlos
Ioannides, Marios
Patsalis, Philippos C.
author_facet Leontiou, Chrysanthia A.
Hadjidaniel, Michael D.
Mina, Petros
Antoniou, Pavlos
Ioannides, Marios
Patsalis, Philippos C.
author_sort Leontiou, Chrysanthia A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Epigenetic alterations, including DNA methylation, play an important role in the regulation of gene expression. Several methods exist for evaluating DNA methylation, but bisulfite sequencing remains the gold standard by which base-pair resolution of CpG methylation is achieved. The challenge of the method is that the desired outcome (conversion of unmethylated cytosines) positively correlates with the undesired side effects (DNA degradation and inappropriate conversion), thus several commercial kits try to adjust a balance between the two. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of four bisulfite conversion kits [Premium Bisulfite kit (Diagenode), EpiTect Bisulfite kit (Qiagen), MethylEdge Bisulfite Conversion System (Promega) and BisulFlash DNA Modification kit (Epigentek)] regarding conversion efficiency, DNA degradation and conversion specificity. METHODS: Performance was tested by combining fully methylated and fully unmethylated λ-DNA controls in a series of spikes by means of Sanger sequencing (0%, 25%, 50% and 100% methylated spikes) and Next-Generation Sequencing (0%, 3%, 5%, 7%, 10%, 25%, 50% and 100% methylated spikes). We also studied the methylation status of two of our previously published differentially methylated regions (DMRs) at base resolution by using spikes of chorionic villus sample in whole blood. RESULTS: The kits studied showed different but comparable results regarding DNA degradation, conversion efficiency and conversion specificity. However, the best performance was observed with the MethylEdge Bisulfite Conversion System (Promega) followed by the Premium Bisulfite kit (Diagenode). The DMRs, EP6 and EP10, were confirmed to be hypermethylated in the CVS and hypomethylated in whole blood. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the MethylEdge Bisulfite Conversion System (Promega) was shown to have the best performance among the kits. In addition, the methylation level of two of our DMRs, EP6 and EP10, was confirmed. Finally, we showed that bisulfite amplicon sequencing is a suitable approach for methylation analysis of targeted regions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4527772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45277722015-08-12 Bisulfite Conversion of DNA: Performance Comparison of Different Kits and Methylation Quantitation of Epigenetic Biomarkers that Have the Potential to Be Used in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing Leontiou, Chrysanthia A. Hadjidaniel, Michael D. Mina, Petros Antoniou, Pavlos Ioannides, Marios Patsalis, Philippos C. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Epigenetic alterations, including DNA methylation, play an important role in the regulation of gene expression. Several methods exist for evaluating DNA methylation, but bisulfite sequencing remains the gold standard by which base-pair resolution of CpG methylation is achieved. The challenge of the method is that the desired outcome (conversion of unmethylated cytosines) positively correlates with the undesired side effects (DNA degradation and inappropriate conversion), thus several commercial kits try to adjust a balance between the two. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of four bisulfite conversion kits [Premium Bisulfite kit (Diagenode), EpiTect Bisulfite kit (Qiagen), MethylEdge Bisulfite Conversion System (Promega) and BisulFlash DNA Modification kit (Epigentek)] regarding conversion efficiency, DNA degradation and conversion specificity. METHODS: Performance was tested by combining fully methylated and fully unmethylated λ-DNA controls in a series of spikes by means of Sanger sequencing (0%, 25%, 50% and 100% methylated spikes) and Next-Generation Sequencing (0%, 3%, 5%, 7%, 10%, 25%, 50% and 100% methylated spikes). We also studied the methylation status of two of our previously published differentially methylated regions (DMRs) at base resolution by using spikes of chorionic villus sample in whole blood. RESULTS: The kits studied showed different but comparable results regarding DNA degradation, conversion efficiency and conversion specificity. However, the best performance was observed with the MethylEdge Bisulfite Conversion System (Promega) followed by the Premium Bisulfite kit (Diagenode). The DMRs, EP6 and EP10, were confirmed to be hypermethylated in the CVS and hypomethylated in whole blood. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the MethylEdge Bisulfite Conversion System (Promega) was shown to have the best performance among the kits. In addition, the methylation level of two of our DMRs, EP6 and EP10, was confirmed. Finally, we showed that bisulfite amplicon sequencing is a suitable approach for methylation analysis of targeted regions. Public Library of Science 2015-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4527772/ /pubmed/26247357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135058 Text en © 2015 Leontiou et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Leontiou, Chrysanthia A.
Hadjidaniel, Michael D.
Mina, Petros
Antoniou, Pavlos
Ioannides, Marios
Patsalis, Philippos C.
Bisulfite Conversion of DNA: Performance Comparison of Different Kits and Methylation Quantitation of Epigenetic Biomarkers that Have the Potential to Be Used in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing
title Bisulfite Conversion of DNA: Performance Comparison of Different Kits and Methylation Quantitation of Epigenetic Biomarkers that Have the Potential to Be Used in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing
title_full Bisulfite Conversion of DNA: Performance Comparison of Different Kits and Methylation Quantitation of Epigenetic Biomarkers that Have the Potential to Be Used in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing
title_fullStr Bisulfite Conversion of DNA: Performance Comparison of Different Kits and Methylation Quantitation of Epigenetic Biomarkers that Have the Potential to Be Used in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing
title_full_unstemmed Bisulfite Conversion of DNA: Performance Comparison of Different Kits and Methylation Quantitation of Epigenetic Biomarkers that Have the Potential to Be Used in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing
title_short Bisulfite Conversion of DNA: Performance Comparison of Different Kits and Methylation Quantitation of Epigenetic Biomarkers that Have the Potential to Be Used in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing
title_sort bisulfite conversion of dna: performance comparison of different kits and methylation quantitation of epigenetic biomarkers that have the potential to be used in non-invasive prenatal testing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4527772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26247357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135058
work_keys_str_mv AT leontiouchrysanthiaa bisulfiteconversionofdnaperformancecomparisonofdifferentkitsandmethylationquantitationofepigeneticbiomarkersthathavethepotentialtobeusedinnoninvasiveprenataltesting
AT hadjidanielmichaeld bisulfiteconversionofdnaperformancecomparisonofdifferentkitsandmethylationquantitationofepigeneticbiomarkersthathavethepotentialtobeusedinnoninvasiveprenataltesting
AT minapetros bisulfiteconversionofdnaperformancecomparisonofdifferentkitsandmethylationquantitationofepigeneticbiomarkersthathavethepotentialtobeusedinnoninvasiveprenataltesting
AT antonioupavlos bisulfiteconversionofdnaperformancecomparisonofdifferentkitsandmethylationquantitationofepigeneticbiomarkersthathavethepotentialtobeusedinnoninvasiveprenataltesting
AT ioannidesmarios bisulfiteconversionofdnaperformancecomparisonofdifferentkitsandmethylationquantitationofepigeneticbiomarkersthathavethepotentialtobeusedinnoninvasiveprenataltesting
AT patsalisphilipposc bisulfiteconversionofdnaperformancecomparisonofdifferentkitsandmethylationquantitationofepigeneticbiomarkersthathavethepotentialtobeusedinnoninvasiveprenataltesting