Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment

BACKGROUND: Protraction facemask has been advocated for treatment of class III malocclusion with maxillary deficiency. Studies using tooth-borne rapid palatal expansion (RPE) appliance as anchorage have experienced side effects such as forward movement of the maxillary molars, excessive proclination...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ngan, Peter, Wilmes, Benedict, Drescher, Dieter, Martin, Chris, Weaver, Bryan, Gunel, Erdogan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Research
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4547969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26303311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-015-0096-7

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4547969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26303311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-015-0096-7

Ejemplares similares