Cargando…
Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment
BACKGROUND: Protraction facemask has been advocated for treatment of class III malocclusion with maxillary deficiency. Studies using tooth-borne rapid palatal expansion (RPE) appliance as anchorage have experienced side effects such as forward movement of the maxillary molars, excessive proclination...
Autores principales: | Ngan, Peter, Wilmes, Benedict, Drescher, Dieter, Martin, Chris, Weaver, Bryan, Gunel, Erdogan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4547969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26303311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-015-0096-7 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Maxillary protraction using a hybrid hyrax-facemask combination
por: Nienkemper, Manuel, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP): A review
por: Kamath, Apoorva, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Dentofacial effects of miniscrew-anchored maxillary protraction on prepubertal children with maxillary deficiency: a randomized controlled trial
por: Kamel, Ahmed Mohamed, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Facemask performance during maxillary protraction: a finite element analysis (FEA) evaluation of load and stress distribution on Delaire facemask
por: Gazzani, Francesca, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Effect of protraction facemask on the temporomandibular joint: a systematic review
por: Huang, Xinqi, et al.
Publicado: (2018)