Cargando…

Enhancing students’ learning in problem based learning: validation of a self-assessment scale for active learning and critical thinking

BACKGROUND: Problem based learning (PBL) is a powerful learning activity but fidelity to intended models may slip and student engagement wane, negatively impacting learning processes, and outcomes. One potential solution to solve this degradation is by encouraging self-assessment in the PBL tutorial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khoiriyah, Umatul, Roberts, Chris, Jorm, Christine, Van der Vleuten, C. P. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4549835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26306762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0422-2
_version_ 1782387363318595584
author Khoiriyah, Umatul
Roberts, Chris
Jorm, Christine
Van der Vleuten, C. P. M.
author_facet Khoiriyah, Umatul
Roberts, Chris
Jorm, Christine
Van der Vleuten, C. P. M.
author_sort Khoiriyah, Umatul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Problem based learning (PBL) is a powerful learning activity but fidelity to intended models may slip and student engagement wane, negatively impacting learning processes, and outcomes. One potential solution to solve this degradation is by encouraging self-assessment in the PBL tutorial. Self-assessment is a central component of the self-regulation of student learning behaviours. There are few measures to investigate self-assessment relevant to PBL processes. We developed a Self-assessment Scale on Active Learning and Critical Thinking (SSACT) to address this gap. We wished to demonstrated evidence of its validity in the context of PBL by exploring its internal structure. METHODS: We used a mixed methods approach to scale development. We developed scale items from a qualitative investigation, literature review, and consideration of previous existing tools used for study of the PBL process. Expert review panels evaluated its content; a process of validation subsequently reduced the pool of items. We used structural equation modelling to undertake a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the SSACT and coefficient alpha. RESULTS: The 14 item SSACT consisted of two domains “active learning” and “critical thinking.” The factorial validity of SSACT was evidenced by all items loading significantly on their expected factors, a good model fit for the data, and good stability across two independent samples. Each subscale had good internal reliability (>0.8) and strongly correlated with each other. CONCLUSIONS: The SSACT has sufficient evidence of its validity to support its use in the PBL process to encourage students to self-assess. The implementation of the SSACT may assist students to improve the quality of their learning in achieving PBL goals such as critical thinking and self-directed learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4549835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45498352015-08-27 Enhancing students’ learning in problem based learning: validation of a self-assessment scale for active learning and critical thinking Khoiriyah, Umatul Roberts, Chris Jorm, Christine Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Problem based learning (PBL) is a powerful learning activity but fidelity to intended models may slip and student engagement wane, negatively impacting learning processes, and outcomes. One potential solution to solve this degradation is by encouraging self-assessment in the PBL tutorial. Self-assessment is a central component of the self-regulation of student learning behaviours. There are few measures to investigate self-assessment relevant to PBL processes. We developed a Self-assessment Scale on Active Learning and Critical Thinking (SSACT) to address this gap. We wished to demonstrated evidence of its validity in the context of PBL by exploring its internal structure. METHODS: We used a mixed methods approach to scale development. We developed scale items from a qualitative investigation, literature review, and consideration of previous existing tools used for study of the PBL process. Expert review panels evaluated its content; a process of validation subsequently reduced the pool of items. We used structural equation modelling to undertake a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the SSACT and coefficient alpha. RESULTS: The 14 item SSACT consisted of two domains “active learning” and “critical thinking.” The factorial validity of SSACT was evidenced by all items loading significantly on their expected factors, a good model fit for the data, and good stability across two independent samples. Each subscale had good internal reliability (>0.8) and strongly correlated with each other. CONCLUSIONS: The SSACT has sufficient evidence of its validity to support its use in the PBL process to encourage students to self-assess. The implementation of the SSACT may assist students to improve the quality of their learning in achieving PBL goals such as critical thinking and self-directed learning. BioMed Central 2015-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4549835/ /pubmed/26306762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0422-2 Text en © Khoiriyah et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Khoiriyah, Umatul
Roberts, Chris
Jorm, Christine
Van der Vleuten, C. P. M.
Enhancing students’ learning in problem based learning: validation of a self-assessment scale for active learning and critical thinking
title Enhancing students’ learning in problem based learning: validation of a self-assessment scale for active learning and critical thinking
title_full Enhancing students’ learning in problem based learning: validation of a self-assessment scale for active learning and critical thinking
title_fullStr Enhancing students’ learning in problem based learning: validation of a self-assessment scale for active learning and critical thinking
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing students’ learning in problem based learning: validation of a self-assessment scale for active learning and critical thinking
title_short Enhancing students’ learning in problem based learning: validation of a self-assessment scale for active learning and critical thinking
title_sort enhancing students’ learning in problem based learning: validation of a self-assessment scale for active learning and critical thinking
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4549835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26306762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0422-2
work_keys_str_mv AT khoiriyahumatul enhancingstudentslearninginproblembasedlearningvalidationofaselfassessmentscaleforactivelearningandcriticalthinking
AT robertschris enhancingstudentslearninginproblembasedlearningvalidationofaselfassessmentscaleforactivelearningandcriticalthinking
AT jormchristine enhancingstudentslearninginproblembasedlearningvalidationofaselfassessmentscaleforactivelearningandcriticalthinking
AT vandervleutencpm enhancingstudentslearninginproblembasedlearningvalidationofaselfassessmentscaleforactivelearningandcriticalthinking