Cargando…

Are There Age-Related Differences in the Ability to Learn Configural Responses?

Age is often associated with a decline in cognitive abilities that are important for maintaining functional independence, such as learning new skills. Many forms of motor learning appear to be relatively well preserved with age, while learning tasks that involve associative binding tend to be negati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clark, Rachel, Freedberg, Michael, Hazeltine, Eliot, Voss, Michelle W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4552811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26317773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137260
_version_ 1782387789214515200
author Clark, Rachel
Freedberg, Michael
Hazeltine, Eliot
Voss, Michelle W.
author_facet Clark, Rachel
Freedberg, Michael
Hazeltine, Eliot
Voss, Michelle W.
author_sort Clark, Rachel
collection PubMed
description Age is often associated with a decline in cognitive abilities that are important for maintaining functional independence, such as learning new skills. Many forms of motor learning appear to be relatively well preserved with age, while learning tasks that involve associative binding tend to be negatively affected. The current study aimed to determine whether age differences exist on a configural response learning task, which includes aspects of motor learning and associative binding. Young (M = 24 years) and older adults (M = 66.5 years) completed a modified version of a configural learning task. Given the requirement of associative binding in the configural relationships between responses, we predicted older adults would show significantly less learning than young adults. Older adults demonstrated lower performance (slower reaction time and lower accuracy). However, contrary to our prediction, older adults showed similar rates of learning as indexed by a configural learning score compared to young adults. These results suggest that the ability to acquire knowledge incidentally about configural response relationships is largely unaffected by cognitive aging. The configural response learning task provides insight into the task demands that constrain learning abilities in older adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4552811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45528112015-09-10 Are There Age-Related Differences in the Ability to Learn Configural Responses? Clark, Rachel Freedberg, Michael Hazeltine, Eliot Voss, Michelle W. PLoS One Research Article Age is often associated with a decline in cognitive abilities that are important for maintaining functional independence, such as learning new skills. Many forms of motor learning appear to be relatively well preserved with age, while learning tasks that involve associative binding tend to be negatively affected. The current study aimed to determine whether age differences exist on a configural response learning task, which includes aspects of motor learning and associative binding. Young (M = 24 years) and older adults (M = 66.5 years) completed a modified version of a configural learning task. Given the requirement of associative binding in the configural relationships between responses, we predicted older adults would show significantly less learning than young adults. Older adults demonstrated lower performance (slower reaction time and lower accuracy). However, contrary to our prediction, older adults showed similar rates of learning as indexed by a configural learning score compared to young adults. These results suggest that the ability to acquire knowledge incidentally about configural response relationships is largely unaffected by cognitive aging. The configural response learning task provides insight into the task demands that constrain learning abilities in older adults. Public Library of Science 2015-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4552811/ /pubmed/26317773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137260 Text en © 2015 Clark et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Clark, Rachel
Freedberg, Michael
Hazeltine, Eliot
Voss, Michelle W.
Are There Age-Related Differences in the Ability to Learn Configural Responses?
title Are There Age-Related Differences in the Ability to Learn Configural Responses?
title_full Are There Age-Related Differences in the Ability to Learn Configural Responses?
title_fullStr Are There Age-Related Differences in the Ability to Learn Configural Responses?
title_full_unstemmed Are There Age-Related Differences in the Ability to Learn Configural Responses?
title_short Are There Age-Related Differences in the Ability to Learn Configural Responses?
title_sort are there age-related differences in the ability to learn configural responses?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4552811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26317773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137260
work_keys_str_mv AT clarkrachel arethereagerelateddifferencesintheabilitytolearnconfiguralresponses
AT freedbergmichael arethereagerelateddifferencesintheabilitytolearnconfiguralresponses
AT hazeltineeliot arethereagerelateddifferencesintheabilitytolearnconfiguralresponses
AT vossmichellew arethereagerelateddifferencesintheabilitytolearnconfiguralresponses