Cargando…

A Bayesian adaptive design for biomarker trials with linked treatments

BACKGROUND: Response to treatments is highly heterogeneous in cancer. Increased availability of biomarkers and targeted treatments has led to the need for trial designs that efficiently test new treatments in biomarker-stratified patient subgroups. METHODS: We propose a novel Bayesian adaptive rando...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wason, James M S, Abraham, Jean E, Baird, Richard D, Gournaris, Ioannis, Vallier, Anne-Laure, Brenton, James D, Earl, Helena M, Mander, Adrian P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4559835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26263479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.278
_version_ 1782388843602771968
author Wason, James M S
Abraham, Jean E
Baird, Richard D
Gournaris, Ioannis
Vallier, Anne-Laure
Brenton, James D
Earl, Helena M
Mander, Adrian P
author_facet Wason, James M S
Abraham, Jean E
Baird, Richard D
Gournaris, Ioannis
Vallier, Anne-Laure
Brenton, James D
Earl, Helena M
Mander, Adrian P
author_sort Wason, James M S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Response to treatments is highly heterogeneous in cancer. Increased availability of biomarkers and targeted treatments has led to the need for trial designs that efficiently test new treatments in biomarker-stratified patient subgroups. METHODS: We propose a novel Bayesian adaptive randomisation (BAR) design for use in multi-arm phase II trials where biomarkers exist that are potentially predictive of a linked treatment's effect. The design is motivated in part by two phase II trials that are currently in development. The design starts by randomising patients to the control treatment or to experimental treatments that the biomarker profile suggests should be active. At interim analyses, data from treated patients are used to update the allocation probabilities. If the linked treatments are effective, the allocation remains high; if ineffective, the allocation changes over the course of the trial to unlinked treatments that are more effective. RESULTS: Our proposed design has high power to detect treatment effects if the pairings of treatment with biomarker are correct, but also performs well when alternative pairings are true. The design is consistently more powerful than parallel-groups stratified trials. CONCLUSIONS: This BAR design is a powerful approach to use when there are pairings of biomarkers with treatments available for testing simultaneously.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4559835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45598352015-09-14 A Bayesian adaptive design for biomarker trials with linked treatments Wason, James M S Abraham, Jean E Baird, Richard D Gournaris, Ioannis Vallier, Anne-Laure Brenton, James D Earl, Helena M Mander, Adrian P Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: Response to treatments is highly heterogeneous in cancer. Increased availability of biomarkers and targeted treatments has led to the need for trial designs that efficiently test new treatments in biomarker-stratified patient subgroups. METHODS: We propose a novel Bayesian adaptive randomisation (BAR) design for use in multi-arm phase II trials where biomarkers exist that are potentially predictive of a linked treatment's effect. The design is motivated in part by two phase II trials that are currently in development. The design starts by randomising patients to the control treatment or to experimental treatments that the biomarker profile suggests should be active. At interim analyses, data from treated patients are used to update the allocation probabilities. If the linked treatments are effective, the allocation remains high; if ineffective, the allocation changes over the course of the trial to unlinked treatments that are more effective. RESULTS: Our proposed design has high power to detect treatment effects if the pairings of treatment with biomarker are correct, but also performs well when alternative pairings are true. The design is consistently more powerful than parallel-groups stratified trials. CONCLUSIONS: This BAR design is a powerful approach to use when there are pairings of biomarkers with treatments available for testing simultaneously. Nature Publishing Group 2015-09-01 2015-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4559835/ /pubmed/26263479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.278 Text en Copyright © 2015 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Wason, James M S
Abraham, Jean E
Baird, Richard D
Gournaris, Ioannis
Vallier, Anne-Laure
Brenton, James D
Earl, Helena M
Mander, Adrian P
A Bayesian adaptive design for biomarker trials with linked treatments
title A Bayesian adaptive design for biomarker trials with linked treatments
title_full A Bayesian adaptive design for biomarker trials with linked treatments
title_fullStr A Bayesian adaptive design for biomarker trials with linked treatments
title_full_unstemmed A Bayesian adaptive design for biomarker trials with linked treatments
title_short A Bayesian adaptive design for biomarker trials with linked treatments
title_sort bayesian adaptive design for biomarker trials with linked treatments
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4559835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26263479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.278
work_keys_str_mv AT wasonjamesms abayesianadaptivedesignforbiomarkertrialswithlinkedtreatments
AT abrahamjeane abayesianadaptivedesignforbiomarkertrialswithlinkedtreatments
AT bairdrichardd abayesianadaptivedesignforbiomarkertrialswithlinkedtreatments
AT gournarisioannis abayesianadaptivedesignforbiomarkertrialswithlinkedtreatments
AT vallierannelaure abayesianadaptivedesignforbiomarkertrialswithlinkedtreatments
AT brentonjamesd abayesianadaptivedesignforbiomarkertrialswithlinkedtreatments
AT earlhelenam abayesianadaptivedesignforbiomarkertrialswithlinkedtreatments
AT manderadrianp abayesianadaptivedesignforbiomarkertrialswithlinkedtreatments
AT wasonjamesms bayesianadaptivedesignforbiomarkertrialswithlinkedtreatments
AT abrahamjeane bayesianadaptivedesignforbiomarkertrialswithlinkedtreatments
AT bairdrichardd bayesianadaptivedesignforbiomarkertrialswithlinkedtreatments
AT gournarisioannis bayesianadaptivedesignforbiomarkertrialswithlinkedtreatments
AT vallierannelaure bayesianadaptivedesignforbiomarkertrialswithlinkedtreatments
AT brentonjamesd bayesianadaptivedesignforbiomarkertrialswithlinkedtreatments
AT earlhelenam bayesianadaptivedesignforbiomarkertrialswithlinkedtreatments
AT manderadrianp bayesianadaptivedesignforbiomarkertrialswithlinkedtreatments