Cargando…

Comparison of digital PCR platforms and semi-nested qPCR as a tool to determine the size of the HIV reservoir

HIV persists in latently infected cells of patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART). This persistent proviral DNA reservoir is an important predictor of viral rebound upon therapy failure or interruption and forms a major obstacle towards cure. Accurate quantification of the low levels of persisting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bosman, K. J., Nijhuis, M., van Ham, P. M., Wensing, A. M. J., Vervisch, K., Vandekerckhove, L., De Spiegelaere, W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4563360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26350506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep13811
_version_ 1782389301104869376
author Bosman, K. J.
Nijhuis, M.
van Ham, P. M.
Wensing, A. M. J.
Vervisch, K.
Vandekerckhove, L.
De Spiegelaere, W.
author_facet Bosman, K. J.
Nijhuis, M.
van Ham, P. M.
Wensing, A. M. J.
Vervisch, K.
Vandekerckhove, L.
De Spiegelaere, W.
author_sort Bosman, K. J.
collection PubMed
description HIV persists in latently infected cells of patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART). This persistent proviral DNA reservoir is an important predictor of viral rebound upon therapy failure or interruption and forms a major obstacle towards cure. Accurate quantification of the low levels of persisting HIV DNA may aid patient monitoring and cure research. Digital PCR is a promising tool that enables direct absolute quantification with high sensitivity. With recent technological advances, several platforms are available to implement digital PCR in a clinical setting. Here, we compared two digital PCR platforms, the Quantstudio 3D (Life Technologies) and the QX100 (Bio-Rad) with a semi-nested qPCR on serial HIV DNA dilutions and DNA isolated from PBMCs of ART-suppressed patients. All three methods were able to detect target to the lowest levels of 2.5 HIV DNA copies. The QX100 excelled in having the least bias and highest precision, efficiency and quantitative linearity. Patient sample quantifications by the QX100 and semi-nested qPCR were highly agreeable by Bland-Altman analysis (0.01 ± 0.32 log(10)). Due to the observation of false-positive signals with current digital PCR platforms however, semi-nested qPCR may still be preferred in a setup of low quantity detection to discriminate between presence or absence of HIV DNA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4563360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45633602015-09-15 Comparison of digital PCR platforms and semi-nested qPCR as a tool to determine the size of the HIV reservoir Bosman, K. J. Nijhuis, M. van Ham, P. M. Wensing, A. M. J. Vervisch, K. Vandekerckhove, L. De Spiegelaere, W. Sci Rep Article HIV persists in latently infected cells of patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART). This persistent proviral DNA reservoir is an important predictor of viral rebound upon therapy failure or interruption and forms a major obstacle towards cure. Accurate quantification of the low levels of persisting HIV DNA may aid patient monitoring and cure research. Digital PCR is a promising tool that enables direct absolute quantification with high sensitivity. With recent technological advances, several platforms are available to implement digital PCR in a clinical setting. Here, we compared two digital PCR platforms, the Quantstudio 3D (Life Technologies) and the QX100 (Bio-Rad) with a semi-nested qPCR on serial HIV DNA dilutions and DNA isolated from PBMCs of ART-suppressed patients. All three methods were able to detect target to the lowest levels of 2.5 HIV DNA copies. The QX100 excelled in having the least bias and highest precision, efficiency and quantitative linearity. Patient sample quantifications by the QX100 and semi-nested qPCR were highly agreeable by Bland-Altman analysis (0.01 ± 0.32 log(10)). Due to the observation of false-positive signals with current digital PCR platforms however, semi-nested qPCR may still be preferred in a setup of low quantity detection to discriminate between presence or absence of HIV DNA. Nature Publishing Group 2015-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4563360/ /pubmed/26350506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep13811 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Bosman, K. J.
Nijhuis, M.
van Ham, P. M.
Wensing, A. M. J.
Vervisch, K.
Vandekerckhove, L.
De Spiegelaere, W.
Comparison of digital PCR platforms and semi-nested qPCR as a tool to determine the size of the HIV reservoir
title Comparison of digital PCR platforms and semi-nested qPCR as a tool to determine the size of the HIV reservoir
title_full Comparison of digital PCR platforms and semi-nested qPCR as a tool to determine the size of the HIV reservoir
title_fullStr Comparison of digital PCR platforms and semi-nested qPCR as a tool to determine the size of the HIV reservoir
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of digital PCR platforms and semi-nested qPCR as a tool to determine the size of the HIV reservoir
title_short Comparison of digital PCR platforms and semi-nested qPCR as a tool to determine the size of the HIV reservoir
title_sort comparison of digital pcr platforms and semi-nested qpcr as a tool to determine the size of the hiv reservoir
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4563360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26350506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep13811
work_keys_str_mv AT bosmankj comparisonofdigitalpcrplatformsandseminestedqpcrasatooltodeterminethesizeofthehivreservoir
AT nijhuism comparisonofdigitalpcrplatformsandseminestedqpcrasatooltodeterminethesizeofthehivreservoir
AT vanhampm comparisonofdigitalpcrplatformsandseminestedqpcrasatooltodeterminethesizeofthehivreservoir
AT wensingamj comparisonofdigitalpcrplatformsandseminestedqpcrasatooltodeterminethesizeofthehivreservoir
AT vervischk comparisonofdigitalpcrplatformsandseminestedqpcrasatooltodeterminethesizeofthehivreservoir
AT vandekerckhovel comparisonofdigitalpcrplatformsandseminestedqpcrasatooltodeterminethesizeofthehivreservoir
AT despiegelaerew comparisonofdigitalpcrplatformsandseminestedqpcrasatooltodeterminethesizeofthehivreservoir