Cargando…
Comparison of circulating lipid profiles between fasting humans and three animal species used in preclinical studies: mice, rats and rabbits
BACKGROUND: Circulating lipid metabolites are associated with many physiological and biological processes in the body, and therefore could be used as biomarkers for evaluating drug efficacy and safety in preclinical studies. However, differences in circulating lipid profiles among humans and animals...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4566205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26358237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12944-015-0104-4 |
_version_ | 1782389689036046336 |
---|---|
author | Ishikawa, Masaki Saito, Kosuke Urata, Masayo Kumagai, Yuji Maekawa, Keiko Saito, Yoshiro |
author_facet | Ishikawa, Masaki Saito, Kosuke Urata, Masayo Kumagai, Yuji Maekawa, Keiko Saito, Yoshiro |
author_sort | Ishikawa, Masaki |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Circulating lipid metabolites are associated with many physiological and biological processes in the body, and therefore could be used as biomarkers for evaluating drug efficacy and safety in preclinical studies. However, differences in circulating lipid profiles among humans and animals often used in preclinical studies have not been fully investigated. METHODS: We performed lipidomic analysis to obtain circulating lipid profiles of fasted humans (Caucasian, n = 15) and three animal species used in preclinical studies (mice [BALB/c, n = 5], rats [Sprague–Dawley, n = 5], and rabbits [New Zealand White, n = 5]) by using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Our data showed marked differences in lipid profiles among humans and these animal species. Furthermore, we observed that the levels of many lipid metabolites, such as poly-unsaturated fatty acid-containing cholesteryl esters, ether-type phosphoglycerolipids, and sulfatides, were significantly different (p < 0.05) by more than 10-fold in these animals (depending on the animal species) from humans. CONCLUSION: Our data could be useful while extrapolating the data on the biomarker candidates identified in preclinical studies into clinical studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12944-015-0104-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4566205 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45662052015-09-12 Comparison of circulating lipid profiles between fasting humans and three animal species used in preclinical studies: mice, rats and rabbits Ishikawa, Masaki Saito, Kosuke Urata, Masayo Kumagai, Yuji Maekawa, Keiko Saito, Yoshiro Lipids Health Dis Research BACKGROUND: Circulating lipid metabolites are associated with many physiological and biological processes in the body, and therefore could be used as biomarkers for evaluating drug efficacy and safety in preclinical studies. However, differences in circulating lipid profiles among humans and animals often used in preclinical studies have not been fully investigated. METHODS: We performed lipidomic analysis to obtain circulating lipid profiles of fasted humans (Caucasian, n = 15) and three animal species used in preclinical studies (mice [BALB/c, n = 5], rats [Sprague–Dawley, n = 5], and rabbits [New Zealand White, n = 5]) by using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Our data showed marked differences in lipid profiles among humans and these animal species. Furthermore, we observed that the levels of many lipid metabolites, such as poly-unsaturated fatty acid-containing cholesteryl esters, ether-type phosphoglycerolipids, and sulfatides, were significantly different (p < 0.05) by more than 10-fold in these animals (depending on the animal species) from humans. CONCLUSION: Our data could be useful while extrapolating the data on the biomarker candidates identified in preclinical studies into clinical studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12944-015-0104-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4566205/ /pubmed/26358237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12944-015-0104-4 Text en © Ishikawa et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Ishikawa, Masaki Saito, Kosuke Urata, Masayo Kumagai, Yuji Maekawa, Keiko Saito, Yoshiro Comparison of circulating lipid profiles between fasting humans and three animal species used in preclinical studies: mice, rats and rabbits |
title | Comparison of circulating lipid profiles between fasting humans and three animal species used in preclinical studies: mice, rats and rabbits |
title_full | Comparison of circulating lipid profiles between fasting humans and three animal species used in preclinical studies: mice, rats and rabbits |
title_fullStr | Comparison of circulating lipid profiles between fasting humans and three animal species used in preclinical studies: mice, rats and rabbits |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of circulating lipid profiles between fasting humans and three animal species used in preclinical studies: mice, rats and rabbits |
title_short | Comparison of circulating lipid profiles between fasting humans and three animal species used in preclinical studies: mice, rats and rabbits |
title_sort | comparison of circulating lipid profiles between fasting humans and three animal species used in preclinical studies: mice, rats and rabbits |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4566205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26358237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12944-015-0104-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ishikawamasaki comparisonofcirculatinglipidprofilesbetweenfastinghumansandthreeanimalspeciesusedinpreclinicalstudiesmiceratsandrabbits AT saitokosuke comparisonofcirculatinglipidprofilesbetweenfastinghumansandthreeanimalspeciesusedinpreclinicalstudiesmiceratsandrabbits AT uratamasayo comparisonofcirculatinglipidprofilesbetweenfastinghumansandthreeanimalspeciesusedinpreclinicalstudiesmiceratsandrabbits AT kumagaiyuji comparisonofcirculatinglipidprofilesbetweenfastinghumansandthreeanimalspeciesusedinpreclinicalstudiesmiceratsandrabbits AT maekawakeiko comparisonofcirculatinglipidprofilesbetweenfastinghumansandthreeanimalspeciesusedinpreclinicalstudiesmiceratsandrabbits AT saitoyoshiro comparisonofcirculatinglipidprofilesbetweenfastinghumansandthreeanimalspeciesusedinpreclinicalstudiesmiceratsandrabbits |