Cargando…

Comparison of circulating lipid profiles between fasting humans and three animal species used in preclinical studies: mice, rats and rabbits

BACKGROUND: Circulating lipid metabolites are associated with many physiological and biological processes in the body, and therefore could be used as biomarkers for evaluating drug efficacy and safety in preclinical studies. However, differences in circulating lipid profiles among humans and animals...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ishikawa, Masaki, Saito, Kosuke, Urata, Masayo, Kumagai, Yuji, Maekawa, Keiko, Saito, Yoshiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4566205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26358237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12944-015-0104-4
_version_ 1782389689036046336
author Ishikawa, Masaki
Saito, Kosuke
Urata, Masayo
Kumagai, Yuji
Maekawa, Keiko
Saito, Yoshiro
author_facet Ishikawa, Masaki
Saito, Kosuke
Urata, Masayo
Kumagai, Yuji
Maekawa, Keiko
Saito, Yoshiro
author_sort Ishikawa, Masaki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Circulating lipid metabolites are associated with many physiological and biological processes in the body, and therefore could be used as biomarkers for evaluating drug efficacy and safety in preclinical studies. However, differences in circulating lipid profiles among humans and animals often used in preclinical studies have not been fully investigated. METHODS: We performed lipidomic analysis to obtain circulating lipid profiles of fasted humans (Caucasian, n = 15) and three animal species used in preclinical studies (mice [BALB/c, n = 5], rats [Sprague–Dawley, n = 5], and rabbits [New Zealand White, n = 5]) by using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Our data showed marked differences in lipid profiles among humans and these animal species. Furthermore, we observed that the levels of many lipid metabolites, such as poly-unsaturated fatty acid-containing cholesteryl esters, ether-type phosphoglycerolipids, and sulfatides, were significantly different (p < 0.05) by more than 10-fold in these animals (depending on the animal species) from humans. CONCLUSION: Our data could be useful while extrapolating the data on the biomarker candidates identified in preclinical studies into clinical studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12944-015-0104-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4566205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45662052015-09-12 Comparison of circulating lipid profiles between fasting humans and three animal species used in preclinical studies: mice, rats and rabbits Ishikawa, Masaki Saito, Kosuke Urata, Masayo Kumagai, Yuji Maekawa, Keiko Saito, Yoshiro Lipids Health Dis Research BACKGROUND: Circulating lipid metabolites are associated with many physiological and biological processes in the body, and therefore could be used as biomarkers for evaluating drug efficacy and safety in preclinical studies. However, differences in circulating lipid profiles among humans and animals often used in preclinical studies have not been fully investigated. METHODS: We performed lipidomic analysis to obtain circulating lipid profiles of fasted humans (Caucasian, n = 15) and three animal species used in preclinical studies (mice [BALB/c, n = 5], rats [Sprague–Dawley, n = 5], and rabbits [New Zealand White, n = 5]) by using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Our data showed marked differences in lipid profiles among humans and these animal species. Furthermore, we observed that the levels of many lipid metabolites, such as poly-unsaturated fatty acid-containing cholesteryl esters, ether-type phosphoglycerolipids, and sulfatides, were significantly different (p < 0.05) by more than 10-fold in these animals (depending on the animal species) from humans. CONCLUSION: Our data could be useful while extrapolating the data on the biomarker candidates identified in preclinical studies into clinical studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12944-015-0104-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4566205/ /pubmed/26358237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12944-015-0104-4 Text en © Ishikawa et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Ishikawa, Masaki
Saito, Kosuke
Urata, Masayo
Kumagai, Yuji
Maekawa, Keiko
Saito, Yoshiro
Comparison of circulating lipid profiles between fasting humans and three animal species used in preclinical studies: mice, rats and rabbits
title Comparison of circulating lipid profiles between fasting humans and three animal species used in preclinical studies: mice, rats and rabbits
title_full Comparison of circulating lipid profiles between fasting humans and three animal species used in preclinical studies: mice, rats and rabbits
title_fullStr Comparison of circulating lipid profiles between fasting humans and three animal species used in preclinical studies: mice, rats and rabbits
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of circulating lipid profiles between fasting humans and three animal species used in preclinical studies: mice, rats and rabbits
title_short Comparison of circulating lipid profiles between fasting humans and three animal species used in preclinical studies: mice, rats and rabbits
title_sort comparison of circulating lipid profiles between fasting humans and three animal species used in preclinical studies: mice, rats and rabbits
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4566205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26358237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12944-015-0104-4
work_keys_str_mv AT ishikawamasaki comparisonofcirculatinglipidprofilesbetweenfastinghumansandthreeanimalspeciesusedinpreclinicalstudiesmiceratsandrabbits
AT saitokosuke comparisonofcirculatinglipidprofilesbetweenfastinghumansandthreeanimalspeciesusedinpreclinicalstudiesmiceratsandrabbits
AT uratamasayo comparisonofcirculatinglipidprofilesbetweenfastinghumansandthreeanimalspeciesusedinpreclinicalstudiesmiceratsandrabbits
AT kumagaiyuji comparisonofcirculatinglipidprofilesbetweenfastinghumansandthreeanimalspeciesusedinpreclinicalstudiesmiceratsandrabbits
AT maekawakeiko comparisonofcirculatinglipidprofilesbetweenfastinghumansandthreeanimalspeciesusedinpreclinicalstudiesmiceratsandrabbits
AT saitoyoshiro comparisonofcirculatinglipidprofilesbetweenfastinghumansandthreeanimalspeciesusedinpreclinicalstudiesmiceratsandrabbits