Cargando…
Generalization of Dexterous Manipulation Is Sensitive to the Frame of Reference in Which It Is Learned
Studies have shown that internal representations of manipulations of objects with asymmetric mass distributions that are generated within a specific orientation are not generalizable to novel orientations, i.e., subjects fail to prevent object roll on their first grasp-lift attempt of the object fol...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4573321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26376089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138258 |
_version_ | 1782390472362164224 |
---|---|
author | Marneweck, Michelle Knelange, Elisabeth Lee-Miller, Trevor Santello, Marco Gordon, Andrew M. |
author_facet | Marneweck, Michelle Knelange, Elisabeth Lee-Miller, Trevor Santello, Marco Gordon, Andrew M. |
author_sort | Marneweck, Michelle |
collection | PubMed |
description | Studies have shown that internal representations of manipulations of objects with asymmetric mass distributions that are generated within a specific orientation are not generalizable to novel orientations, i.e., subjects fail to prevent object roll on their first grasp-lift attempt of the object following 180° object rotation. This suggests that representations of these manipulations are specific to the reference frame in which they are formed. However, it is unknown whether that reference frame is specific to the hand, the body, or both, because rotating the object 180° modifies the relation between object and body as well as object and hand. An alternative, untested explanation for the above failure to generalize learned manipulations is that any rotation will disrupt grasp performance, regardless if the reference frame in which the manipulation was learned is maintained or modified. We examined the effect of rotations that (1) maintain and (2) modify relations between object and body, and object and hand, on the generalizability of learned two-digit manipulation of an object with an asymmetric mass distribution. Following rotations that maintained the relation between object and body and object and hand (e.g., rotating the object and subject 180°), subjects continued to use appropriate digit placement and load force distributions, thus generating sufficient compensatory moments to minimize object roll. In contrast, following rotations that modified the relation between (1) object and hand (e.g. rotating the hand around to the opposite object side), (2) object and body (e.g. rotating subject and hand 180°), or (3) both (e.g. rotating the subject 180°), subjects used the same, yet inappropriate digit placement and load force distribution, as those used prior to the rotation. Consequently, the compensatory moments were insufficient to prevent large object rolls. These findings suggest that representations of learned manipulation of objects with asymmetric mass distributions are specific to the body- and hand-reference frames in which they were learned. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4573321 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45733212015-09-18 Generalization of Dexterous Manipulation Is Sensitive to the Frame of Reference in Which It Is Learned Marneweck, Michelle Knelange, Elisabeth Lee-Miller, Trevor Santello, Marco Gordon, Andrew M. PLoS One Research Article Studies have shown that internal representations of manipulations of objects with asymmetric mass distributions that are generated within a specific orientation are not generalizable to novel orientations, i.e., subjects fail to prevent object roll on their first grasp-lift attempt of the object following 180° object rotation. This suggests that representations of these manipulations are specific to the reference frame in which they are formed. However, it is unknown whether that reference frame is specific to the hand, the body, or both, because rotating the object 180° modifies the relation between object and body as well as object and hand. An alternative, untested explanation for the above failure to generalize learned manipulations is that any rotation will disrupt grasp performance, regardless if the reference frame in which the manipulation was learned is maintained or modified. We examined the effect of rotations that (1) maintain and (2) modify relations between object and body, and object and hand, on the generalizability of learned two-digit manipulation of an object with an asymmetric mass distribution. Following rotations that maintained the relation between object and body and object and hand (e.g., rotating the object and subject 180°), subjects continued to use appropriate digit placement and load force distributions, thus generating sufficient compensatory moments to minimize object roll. In contrast, following rotations that modified the relation between (1) object and hand (e.g. rotating the hand around to the opposite object side), (2) object and body (e.g. rotating subject and hand 180°), or (3) both (e.g. rotating the subject 180°), subjects used the same, yet inappropriate digit placement and load force distribution, as those used prior to the rotation. Consequently, the compensatory moments were insufficient to prevent large object rolls. These findings suggest that representations of learned manipulation of objects with asymmetric mass distributions are specific to the body- and hand-reference frames in which they were learned. Public Library of Science 2015-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4573321/ /pubmed/26376089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138258 Text en © 2015 Marneweck et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Marneweck, Michelle Knelange, Elisabeth Lee-Miller, Trevor Santello, Marco Gordon, Andrew M. Generalization of Dexterous Manipulation Is Sensitive to the Frame of Reference in Which It Is Learned |
title | Generalization of Dexterous Manipulation Is Sensitive to the Frame of Reference in Which It Is Learned |
title_full | Generalization of Dexterous Manipulation Is Sensitive to the Frame of Reference in Which It Is Learned |
title_fullStr | Generalization of Dexterous Manipulation Is Sensitive to the Frame of Reference in Which It Is Learned |
title_full_unstemmed | Generalization of Dexterous Manipulation Is Sensitive to the Frame of Reference in Which It Is Learned |
title_short | Generalization of Dexterous Manipulation Is Sensitive to the Frame of Reference in Which It Is Learned |
title_sort | generalization of dexterous manipulation is sensitive to the frame of reference in which it is learned |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4573321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26376089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138258 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marneweckmichelle generalizationofdexterousmanipulationissensitivetotheframeofreferenceinwhichitislearned AT knelangeelisabeth generalizationofdexterousmanipulationissensitivetotheframeofreferenceinwhichitislearned AT leemillertrevor generalizationofdexterousmanipulationissensitivetotheframeofreferenceinwhichitislearned AT santellomarco generalizationofdexterousmanipulationissensitivetotheframeofreferenceinwhichitislearned AT gordonandrewm generalizationofdexterousmanipulationissensitivetotheframeofreferenceinwhichitislearned |