Cargando…

Comparison of Hi-C results using in-solution versus in-nucleus ligation

BACKGROUND: Chromosome conformation capture and various derivative methods such as 4C, 5C and Hi-C have emerged as standard tools to analyze the three-dimensional organization of the genome in the nucleus. These methods employ ligation of diluted cross-linked chromatin complexes, intended to favor p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nagano, Takashi, Várnai, Csilla, Schoenfelder, Stefan, Javierre, Biola-Maria, Wingett, Steven W., Fraser, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4580221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26306623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0753-7
_version_ 1782391368253964288
author Nagano, Takashi
Várnai, Csilla
Schoenfelder, Stefan
Javierre, Biola-Maria
Wingett, Steven W.
Fraser, Peter
author_facet Nagano, Takashi
Várnai, Csilla
Schoenfelder, Stefan
Javierre, Biola-Maria
Wingett, Steven W.
Fraser, Peter
author_sort Nagano, Takashi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chromosome conformation capture and various derivative methods such as 4C, 5C and Hi-C have emerged as standard tools to analyze the three-dimensional organization of the genome in the nucleus. These methods employ ligation of diluted cross-linked chromatin complexes, intended to favor proximity-dependent, intra-complex ligation. During development of single-cell Hi-C, we devised an alternative Hi-C protocol with ligation in preserved nuclei rather than in solution. Here we directly compare Hi-C methods employing in-nucleus ligation with the standard in-solution ligation. RESULTS: We show in-nucleus ligation results in consistently lower levels of inter-chromosomal contacts. Through chromatin mixing experiments we show that a significantly large fraction of inter-chromosomal contacts are the result of spurious ligation events formed during in-solution ligation. In-nucleus ligation significantly reduces this source of experimental noise, and results in improved reproducibility between replicates. We also find that in-nucleus ligation eliminates restriction fragment length bias found with in-solution ligation. These improvements result in greater reproducibility of long-range intra-chromosomal and inter-chromosomal contacts, as well as enhanced detection of structural features such as topologically associated domain boundaries. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in-nucleus ligation captures chromatin interactions more consistently over a wider range of distances, and significantly reduces both experimental noise and bias. In-nucleus ligation creates higher quality Hi-C libraries while simplifying the experimental procedure. We suggest that the entire range of 3C applications are likely to show similar benefits from in-nucleus ligation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0753-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4580221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45802212015-09-24 Comparison of Hi-C results using in-solution versus in-nucleus ligation Nagano, Takashi Várnai, Csilla Schoenfelder, Stefan Javierre, Biola-Maria Wingett, Steven W. Fraser, Peter Genome Biol Research BACKGROUND: Chromosome conformation capture and various derivative methods such as 4C, 5C and Hi-C have emerged as standard tools to analyze the three-dimensional organization of the genome in the nucleus. These methods employ ligation of diluted cross-linked chromatin complexes, intended to favor proximity-dependent, intra-complex ligation. During development of single-cell Hi-C, we devised an alternative Hi-C protocol with ligation in preserved nuclei rather than in solution. Here we directly compare Hi-C methods employing in-nucleus ligation with the standard in-solution ligation. RESULTS: We show in-nucleus ligation results in consistently lower levels of inter-chromosomal contacts. Through chromatin mixing experiments we show that a significantly large fraction of inter-chromosomal contacts are the result of spurious ligation events formed during in-solution ligation. In-nucleus ligation significantly reduces this source of experimental noise, and results in improved reproducibility between replicates. We also find that in-nucleus ligation eliminates restriction fragment length bias found with in-solution ligation. These improvements result in greater reproducibility of long-range intra-chromosomal and inter-chromosomal contacts, as well as enhanced detection of structural features such as topologically associated domain boundaries. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in-nucleus ligation captures chromatin interactions more consistently over a wider range of distances, and significantly reduces both experimental noise and bias. In-nucleus ligation creates higher quality Hi-C libraries while simplifying the experimental procedure. We suggest that the entire range of 3C applications are likely to show similar benefits from in-nucleus ligation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0753-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-08-26 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4580221/ /pubmed/26306623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0753-7 Text en © Nagano et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Nagano, Takashi
Várnai, Csilla
Schoenfelder, Stefan
Javierre, Biola-Maria
Wingett, Steven W.
Fraser, Peter
Comparison of Hi-C results using in-solution versus in-nucleus ligation
title Comparison of Hi-C results using in-solution versus in-nucleus ligation
title_full Comparison of Hi-C results using in-solution versus in-nucleus ligation
title_fullStr Comparison of Hi-C results using in-solution versus in-nucleus ligation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Hi-C results using in-solution versus in-nucleus ligation
title_short Comparison of Hi-C results using in-solution versus in-nucleus ligation
title_sort comparison of hi-c results using in-solution versus in-nucleus ligation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4580221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26306623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0753-7
work_keys_str_mv AT naganotakashi comparisonofhicresultsusinginsolutionversusinnucleusligation
AT varnaicsilla comparisonofhicresultsusinginsolutionversusinnucleusligation
AT schoenfelderstefan comparisonofhicresultsusinginsolutionversusinnucleusligation
AT javierrebiolamaria comparisonofhicresultsusinginsolutionversusinnucleusligation
AT wingettstevenw comparisonofhicresultsusinginsolutionversusinnucleusligation
AT fraserpeter comparisonofhicresultsusinginsolutionversusinnucleusligation