Cargando…
Solutions to Peto's paradox revealed by mathematical modelling and cross-species cancer gene analysis
Whales have 1000-fold more cells than humans and mice have 1000-fold fewer; however, cancer risk across species does not increase with the number of somatic cells and the lifespan of the organism. This observation is known as Peto's paradox. How much would evolution have to change the parameter...
Autores principales: | Caulin, Aleah F., Graham, Trevor A., Wang, Li-San, Maley, Carlo C. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4581027/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26056366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0222 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Natural resistance to cancers: a Darwinian hypothesis to explain Peto’s paradox
por: Roche, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Peto’s Paradox: how has evolution solved the problem of cancer prevention?
por: Tollis, Marc, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
A mathematical solution to Peto’s paradox using Polya’s urn model: implications for the aetiology of cancer in general
por: Salazar-Bañuelos, Anastasio
Publicado: (2019) -
Cell size and cancer: a new solution to Peto's paradox?
por: Maciak, Sebastian, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
A metabolic perspective of Peto's paradox and cancer
por: Dang, Chi V.
Publicado: (2015)