Cargando…

A Sex-Specific Analysis of Nutrition Label Use and Health, Douglas County, Nebraska, 2013

INTRODUCTION: In 2014 the US Food and Drug Administration proposed a series of changes to its 1992 guidelines on nutrition facts labeling to help consumers make informed food choices. To date, few studies have examined the association between consumers’ use of the nutrition label and health. The obj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Su, Dejun, Zhou, Junmin, Jackson, Hannah L., Soliman, Ghada A., Huang, Terry T-K, Yaroch, Amy L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4584472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26402048
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd12.150167
_version_ 1782391994362888192
author Su, Dejun
Zhou, Junmin
Jackson, Hannah L.
Soliman, Ghada A.
Huang, Terry T-K
Yaroch, Amy L.
author_facet Su, Dejun
Zhou, Junmin
Jackson, Hannah L.
Soliman, Ghada A.
Huang, Terry T-K
Yaroch, Amy L.
author_sort Su, Dejun
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In 2014 the US Food and Drug Administration proposed a series of changes to its 1992 guidelines on nutrition facts labeling to help consumers make informed food choices. To date, few studies have examined the association between consumers’ use of the nutrition label and health. The objective of this study was to assess the association between nutrition label use and health and to determine whether the association differs by sex. METHODS: Using data from a population-based, random sample survey of 1,503 participants conducted in Nebraska in 2013, we performed χ(2) tests to examine bivariate associations between selected health variables and nutrition label use, followed by logistic regression analysis to estimate these associations in a multivariate framework. RESULTS: A U-shaped relationship between self-rated health (SRH) and nutrition label use was observed. Both excellent and poor SRH were associated with a higher likelihood of nutrition label use than the 3 SRH categories in between. Being obese or having 1 of 4 chronic conditions (hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, high cholesterol) were both associated with higher odds of nutrition label use (odds ratio [OR] = 2.63, P < .001; OR = 1.71, P < .05, respectively) among men. These associations, however, were not significant among women. CONCLUSION: A close association existed between health and nutritional label use. This association was more pronounced among men than among women. Nutrition education may benefit from factoring in the association between health and use of nutrition labels and the differences in these associations by sex.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4584472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45844722015-10-08 A Sex-Specific Analysis of Nutrition Label Use and Health, Douglas County, Nebraska, 2013 Su, Dejun Zhou, Junmin Jackson, Hannah L. Soliman, Ghada A. Huang, Terry T-K Yaroch, Amy L. Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: In 2014 the US Food and Drug Administration proposed a series of changes to its 1992 guidelines on nutrition facts labeling to help consumers make informed food choices. To date, few studies have examined the association between consumers’ use of the nutrition label and health. The objective of this study was to assess the association between nutrition label use and health and to determine whether the association differs by sex. METHODS: Using data from a population-based, random sample survey of 1,503 participants conducted in Nebraska in 2013, we performed χ(2) tests to examine bivariate associations between selected health variables and nutrition label use, followed by logistic regression analysis to estimate these associations in a multivariate framework. RESULTS: A U-shaped relationship between self-rated health (SRH) and nutrition label use was observed. Both excellent and poor SRH were associated with a higher likelihood of nutrition label use than the 3 SRH categories in between. Being obese or having 1 of 4 chronic conditions (hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, high cholesterol) were both associated with higher odds of nutrition label use (odds ratio [OR] = 2.63, P < .001; OR = 1.71, P < .05, respectively) among men. These associations, however, were not significant among women. CONCLUSION: A close association existed between health and nutritional label use. This association was more pronounced among men than among women. Nutrition education may benefit from factoring in the association between health and use of nutrition labels and the differences in these associations by sex. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2015-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4584472/ /pubmed/26402048 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd12.150167 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Su, Dejun
Zhou, Junmin
Jackson, Hannah L.
Soliman, Ghada A.
Huang, Terry T-K
Yaroch, Amy L.
A Sex-Specific Analysis of Nutrition Label Use and Health, Douglas County, Nebraska, 2013
title A Sex-Specific Analysis of Nutrition Label Use and Health, Douglas County, Nebraska, 2013
title_full A Sex-Specific Analysis of Nutrition Label Use and Health, Douglas County, Nebraska, 2013
title_fullStr A Sex-Specific Analysis of Nutrition Label Use and Health, Douglas County, Nebraska, 2013
title_full_unstemmed A Sex-Specific Analysis of Nutrition Label Use and Health, Douglas County, Nebraska, 2013
title_short A Sex-Specific Analysis of Nutrition Label Use and Health, Douglas County, Nebraska, 2013
title_sort sex-specific analysis of nutrition label use and health, douglas county, nebraska, 2013
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4584472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26402048
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd12.150167
work_keys_str_mv AT sudejun asexspecificanalysisofnutritionlabeluseandhealthdouglascountynebraska2013
AT zhoujunmin asexspecificanalysisofnutritionlabeluseandhealthdouglascountynebraska2013
AT jacksonhannahl asexspecificanalysisofnutritionlabeluseandhealthdouglascountynebraska2013
AT solimanghadaa asexspecificanalysisofnutritionlabeluseandhealthdouglascountynebraska2013
AT huangterrytk asexspecificanalysisofnutritionlabeluseandhealthdouglascountynebraska2013
AT yarochamyl asexspecificanalysisofnutritionlabeluseandhealthdouglascountynebraska2013
AT sudejun sexspecificanalysisofnutritionlabeluseandhealthdouglascountynebraska2013
AT zhoujunmin sexspecificanalysisofnutritionlabeluseandhealthdouglascountynebraska2013
AT jacksonhannahl sexspecificanalysisofnutritionlabeluseandhealthdouglascountynebraska2013
AT solimanghadaa sexspecificanalysisofnutritionlabeluseandhealthdouglascountynebraska2013
AT huangterrytk sexspecificanalysisofnutritionlabeluseandhealthdouglascountynebraska2013
AT yarochamyl sexspecificanalysisofnutritionlabeluseandhealthdouglascountynebraska2013