Cargando…

Flow cytometric evaluation of physico-chemical impact on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria

Since heat sensitivity of fruits and vegetables limits the application of thermal inactivation processes, new emerging inactivation technologies have to be established to fulfill the requirements of food safety without affecting the produce quality. The efficiency of inactivation treatments has to b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fröhling, Antje, Schlüter, Oliver
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4585319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26441874
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00939
_version_ 1782392181130002432
author Fröhling, Antje
Schlüter, Oliver
author_facet Fröhling, Antje
Schlüter, Oliver
author_sort Fröhling, Antje
collection PubMed
description Since heat sensitivity of fruits and vegetables limits the application of thermal inactivation processes, new emerging inactivation technologies have to be established to fulfill the requirements of food safety without affecting the produce quality. The efficiency of inactivation treatments has to be ensured and monitored. Monitoring of inactivation effects is commonly performed using traditional cultivation methods which have the disadvantage of the time span needed to obtain results. The aim of this study was to compare the inactivation effects of peracetic acid (PAA), ozonated water (O(3)), and cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAPP) on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria using flow cytometric methods. E. coli cells were completely depolarized after treatment (15 s) with 0.25% PAA at 10°C, and after treatment (10 s) with 3.8 mg l(−1) O(3) at 12°C. The membrane potential of CAPP treated cells remained almost constant at an operating power of 20 W over a time period of 3 min, and subsequently decreased within 30 s of further treatment. Complete membrane permeabilization was observed after 10 s O(3) treatment, but treatment with PAA and CAPP did not completely permeabilize the cells within 2 and 4 min, respectively. Similar results were obtained for esterase activity. O(3) inactivates cellular esterase but esterase activity was detected after 4 min CAPP treatment and 2 min PAA treatment. L. innocua cells and P. carotovorum cells were also permeabilized instantaneously by O(3) treatment at concentrations of 3.8 ± 1 mg l(−1). However, higher membrane permeabilization of L. innocua and P. carotovorum than of E. coli was observed at CAPP treatment of 20 W. The degree of bacterial damage due to the inactivation processes is highly dependent on treatment parameters as well as on treated bacteria. Important information regarding the inactivation mechanisms can be obtained by flow cytometric measurements and this enables the definition of critical process parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4585319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45853192015-10-05 Flow cytometric evaluation of physico-chemical impact on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria Fröhling, Antje Schlüter, Oliver Front Microbiol Microbiology Since heat sensitivity of fruits and vegetables limits the application of thermal inactivation processes, new emerging inactivation technologies have to be established to fulfill the requirements of food safety without affecting the produce quality. The efficiency of inactivation treatments has to be ensured and monitored. Monitoring of inactivation effects is commonly performed using traditional cultivation methods which have the disadvantage of the time span needed to obtain results. The aim of this study was to compare the inactivation effects of peracetic acid (PAA), ozonated water (O(3)), and cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAPP) on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria using flow cytometric methods. E. coli cells were completely depolarized after treatment (15 s) with 0.25% PAA at 10°C, and after treatment (10 s) with 3.8 mg l(−1) O(3) at 12°C. The membrane potential of CAPP treated cells remained almost constant at an operating power of 20 W over a time period of 3 min, and subsequently decreased within 30 s of further treatment. Complete membrane permeabilization was observed after 10 s O(3) treatment, but treatment with PAA and CAPP did not completely permeabilize the cells within 2 and 4 min, respectively. Similar results were obtained for esterase activity. O(3) inactivates cellular esterase but esterase activity was detected after 4 min CAPP treatment and 2 min PAA treatment. L. innocua cells and P. carotovorum cells were also permeabilized instantaneously by O(3) treatment at concentrations of 3.8 ± 1 mg l(−1). However, higher membrane permeabilization of L. innocua and P. carotovorum than of E. coli was observed at CAPP treatment of 20 W. The degree of bacterial damage due to the inactivation processes is highly dependent on treatment parameters as well as on treated bacteria. Important information regarding the inactivation mechanisms can be obtained by flow cytometric measurements and this enables the definition of critical process parameters. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4585319/ /pubmed/26441874 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00939 Text en Copyright © 2015 Fröhling and Schlüter. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Fröhling, Antje
Schlüter, Oliver
Flow cytometric evaluation of physico-chemical impact on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria
title Flow cytometric evaluation of physico-chemical impact on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria
title_full Flow cytometric evaluation of physico-chemical impact on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria
title_fullStr Flow cytometric evaluation of physico-chemical impact on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria
title_full_unstemmed Flow cytometric evaluation of physico-chemical impact on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria
title_short Flow cytometric evaluation of physico-chemical impact on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria
title_sort flow cytometric evaluation of physico-chemical impact on gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4585319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26441874
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00939
work_keys_str_mv AT frohlingantje flowcytometricevaluationofphysicochemicalimpactongrampositiveandgramnegativebacteria
AT schluteroliver flowcytometricevaluationofphysicochemicalimpactongrampositiveandgramnegativebacteria