Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether reports from reviewers recommended by authors show a bias in quality and recommendation for editorial decision, compared with reviewers suggested by other parties, and whether reviewer reports for journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models differ with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kowalczuk, Maria K, Dudbridge, Frank, Nanda, Shreeya, Harriman, Stephanie L, Patel, Jigisha, Moylan, Elizabeth C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Communication
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4593157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26423855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008707

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4593157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26423855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008707

Ejemplares similares