Cargando…

Pharmacodynamics of nine generic products of amikacin compared with the innovator in the neutropenic mouse thigh infection model

BACKGROUND: Previously, we validated the mouse thigh infection model to test the therapeutic equivalence of generic antibiotic products. Here, our aim was to compare the in vivo efficacy of amikacin products in clinical use in Colombia using this animal model. RESULTS: All except one generic product...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zuluaga, Andres F., Rodriguez, Carlos A., Agudelo, Maria, Vesga, Omar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4596513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26445936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1507-z
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Previously, we validated the mouse thigh infection model to test the therapeutic equivalence of generic antibiotic products. Here, our aim was to compare the in vivo efficacy of amikacin products in clinical use in Colombia using this animal model. RESULTS: All except one generic product had the same in vitro potency, judging by the lack of differences on MIC and MBC compared with the innovator. However, eight of nine generic products failed in the neutropenic mouse thigh infection model to achieve the innovator’s maximum effect (E(max) ≤ 5.65 for the generics vs. 6.58 log(10) CFU/g for the innovator) against Escherichia coli SIG-1, after subcutaneous treatment every 6 h with doses ranging from 1.5 to 3072 mg/kg per day. CONCLUSION: As we demonstrated previously with other antibiotics such as vancomycin, gentamicin and oxacillin, the generic products of amikacin failed the in vivo efficacy testing. The therapeutic equivalence should be assessed in vivo before clinical approval of generic products.