Cargando…

The first two cell-fate decisions of preimplantation mouse embryo development are not functionally independent

During mouse preimplantation embryo development, three distinct cell lineages are formed, represented by the differentiating trophectoderm (TE), primitive endoderm (PrE) and the pluripotent epiblast (EPI). Classically, lineage derivation has been presented as a two-step process whereby outer TE cell...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mihajlović, Aleksandar I., Thamodaran, Vasanth, Bruce, Alexander W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4602213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26461180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep15034
_version_ 1782394674242125824
author Mihajlović, Aleksandar I.
Thamodaran, Vasanth
Bruce, Alexander W.
author_facet Mihajlović, Aleksandar I.
Thamodaran, Vasanth
Bruce, Alexander W.
author_sort Mihajlović, Aleksandar I.
collection PubMed
description During mouse preimplantation embryo development, three distinct cell lineages are formed, represented by the differentiating trophectoderm (TE), primitive endoderm (PrE) and the pluripotent epiblast (EPI). Classically, lineage derivation has been presented as a two-step process whereby outer TE cells are first segregated from inner-cell mass (ICM), followed by ICM refinement into either the PrE or EPI. As ICM founders can be produced following the fourth or fifth cleavage divisions, their potential to equally contribute to EPI and PrE is contested. Thus, modelling the early sequestration of ICM founders from TE-differentiation after the fourth cleavage division, we examined ICM lineage contribution of varying sized cell clones unable to initiate TE-differentiation. Such TE-inhibited ICM cells do not equally contribute to EPI and PrE and are significantly biased to form EPI. This bias is not caused by enhanced expression of the EPI marker Nanog, nor correlated with reduced apical polarity but associated with reduced expression of PrE-related gene transcripts (Dab2 and Lrp2) and down-regulation of plasma membrane associated Fgfr2. Our results favour a unifying model were the three cell lineages are guided in an integrated, yet flexible, fate decision centred on relative exposure of founder cells to TE-differentiative cues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4602213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46022132015-10-23 The first two cell-fate decisions of preimplantation mouse embryo development are not functionally independent Mihajlović, Aleksandar I. Thamodaran, Vasanth Bruce, Alexander W. Sci Rep Article During mouse preimplantation embryo development, three distinct cell lineages are formed, represented by the differentiating trophectoderm (TE), primitive endoderm (PrE) and the pluripotent epiblast (EPI). Classically, lineage derivation has been presented as a two-step process whereby outer TE cells are first segregated from inner-cell mass (ICM), followed by ICM refinement into either the PrE or EPI. As ICM founders can be produced following the fourth or fifth cleavage divisions, their potential to equally contribute to EPI and PrE is contested. Thus, modelling the early sequestration of ICM founders from TE-differentiation after the fourth cleavage division, we examined ICM lineage contribution of varying sized cell clones unable to initiate TE-differentiation. Such TE-inhibited ICM cells do not equally contribute to EPI and PrE and are significantly biased to form EPI. This bias is not caused by enhanced expression of the EPI marker Nanog, nor correlated with reduced apical polarity but associated with reduced expression of PrE-related gene transcripts (Dab2 and Lrp2) and down-regulation of plasma membrane associated Fgfr2. Our results favour a unifying model were the three cell lineages are guided in an integrated, yet flexible, fate decision centred on relative exposure of founder cells to TE-differentiative cues. Nature Publishing Group 2015-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4602213/ /pubmed/26461180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep15034 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Mihajlović, Aleksandar I.
Thamodaran, Vasanth
Bruce, Alexander W.
The first two cell-fate decisions of preimplantation mouse embryo development are not functionally independent
title The first two cell-fate decisions of preimplantation mouse embryo development are not functionally independent
title_full The first two cell-fate decisions of preimplantation mouse embryo development are not functionally independent
title_fullStr The first two cell-fate decisions of preimplantation mouse embryo development are not functionally independent
title_full_unstemmed The first two cell-fate decisions of preimplantation mouse embryo development are not functionally independent
title_short The first two cell-fate decisions of preimplantation mouse embryo development are not functionally independent
title_sort first two cell-fate decisions of preimplantation mouse embryo development are not functionally independent
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4602213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26461180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep15034
work_keys_str_mv AT mihajlovicaleksandari thefirsttwocellfatedecisionsofpreimplantationmouseembryodevelopmentarenotfunctionallyindependent
AT thamodaranvasanth thefirsttwocellfatedecisionsofpreimplantationmouseembryodevelopmentarenotfunctionallyindependent
AT brucealexanderw thefirsttwocellfatedecisionsofpreimplantationmouseembryodevelopmentarenotfunctionallyindependent
AT mihajlovicaleksandari firsttwocellfatedecisionsofpreimplantationmouseembryodevelopmentarenotfunctionallyindependent
AT thamodaranvasanth firsttwocellfatedecisionsofpreimplantationmouseembryodevelopmentarenotfunctionallyindependent
AT brucealexanderw firsttwocellfatedecisionsofpreimplantationmouseembryodevelopmentarenotfunctionallyindependent