Cargando…
Vagus nerve stimulation lead removal or replacement: surgical technique, institutional experience, and literature overview
BACKGROUND: With the growing use of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) as a treatment for refractory epilepsy, there is a growing demand for complete removal or replacement of the VNS system. We evaluate the safety and efficacy of complete removal or replacement of the VNS system and provide an extensive...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4604497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26335753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-015-2547-9 |
_version_ | 1782395065125044224 |
---|---|
author | Aalbers, Marlien W. Rijkers, Kim Klinkenberg, Sylvia Majoie, Marian Cornips, Erwin M. J. |
author_facet | Aalbers, Marlien W. Rijkers, Kim Klinkenberg, Sylvia Majoie, Marian Cornips, Erwin M. J. |
author_sort | Aalbers, Marlien W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With the growing use of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) as a treatment for refractory epilepsy, there is a growing demand for complete removal or replacement of the VNS system. We evaluate the safety and efficacy of complete removal or replacement of the VNS system and provide an extensive description of our surgical technique. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our patient registry for all VNS surgeries performed between January 2007 (the year of our first complete removal) and May 2014. In order to assess patient satisfaction, a written questionnaire was sent to patients or their caregivers. Additionally, we reviewed all literature on this topic. RESULTS: The VNS system was completely removed in 22 patients and completely replaced in 13 patients. There were no incomplete removals. Revision surgery was complicated by a small laceration of the jugular vein in two patients and by vocal cord paralysis in one patient. Seizure frequency was unaltered or improved after revision surgery. Electrode-related side effects all improved after revision surgery. Twenty-one studies reported a total of 131 patients in whom the VNS system was completely removed. In 95 patients, the system was subsequently replaced. The most frequently reported side effect was vocal cord paresis, which occurred in four patients. CONCLUSIONS: Complete removal or replacement of the VNS system including lead and coils is feasible and safe. Although initial results seem promising, further research and longer follow-up are needed to assess whether lead replacement may affect VNS effectiveness. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00701-015-2547-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4604497 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46044972015-10-19 Vagus nerve stimulation lead removal or replacement: surgical technique, institutional experience, and literature overview Aalbers, Marlien W. Rijkers, Kim Klinkenberg, Sylvia Majoie, Marian Cornips, Erwin M. J. Acta Neurochir (Wien) Clinical Article - Functional BACKGROUND: With the growing use of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) as a treatment for refractory epilepsy, there is a growing demand for complete removal or replacement of the VNS system. We evaluate the safety and efficacy of complete removal or replacement of the VNS system and provide an extensive description of our surgical technique. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our patient registry for all VNS surgeries performed between January 2007 (the year of our first complete removal) and May 2014. In order to assess patient satisfaction, a written questionnaire was sent to patients or their caregivers. Additionally, we reviewed all literature on this topic. RESULTS: The VNS system was completely removed in 22 patients and completely replaced in 13 patients. There were no incomplete removals. Revision surgery was complicated by a small laceration of the jugular vein in two patients and by vocal cord paralysis in one patient. Seizure frequency was unaltered or improved after revision surgery. Electrode-related side effects all improved after revision surgery. Twenty-one studies reported a total of 131 patients in whom the VNS system was completely removed. In 95 patients, the system was subsequently replaced. The most frequently reported side effect was vocal cord paresis, which occurred in four patients. CONCLUSIONS: Complete removal or replacement of the VNS system including lead and coils is feasible and safe. Although initial results seem promising, further research and longer follow-up are needed to assess whether lead replacement may affect VNS effectiveness. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00701-015-2547-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Vienna 2015-09-03 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4604497/ /pubmed/26335753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-015-2547-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Article - Functional Aalbers, Marlien W. Rijkers, Kim Klinkenberg, Sylvia Majoie, Marian Cornips, Erwin M. J. Vagus nerve stimulation lead removal or replacement: surgical technique, institutional experience, and literature overview |
title | Vagus nerve stimulation lead removal or replacement: surgical technique, institutional experience, and literature overview |
title_full | Vagus nerve stimulation lead removal or replacement: surgical technique, institutional experience, and literature overview |
title_fullStr | Vagus nerve stimulation lead removal or replacement: surgical technique, institutional experience, and literature overview |
title_full_unstemmed | Vagus nerve stimulation lead removal or replacement: surgical technique, institutional experience, and literature overview |
title_short | Vagus nerve stimulation lead removal or replacement: surgical technique, institutional experience, and literature overview |
title_sort | vagus nerve stimulation lead removal or replacement: surgical technique, institutional experience, and literature overview |
topic | Clinical Article - Functional |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4604497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26335753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-015-2547-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aalbersmarlienw vagusnervestimulationleadremovalorreplacementsurgicaltechniqueinstitutionalexperienceandliteratureoverview AT rijkerskim vagusnervestimulationleadremovalorreplacementsurgicaltechniqueinstitutionalexperienceandliteratureoverview AT klinkenbergsylvia vagusnervestimulationleadremovalorreplacementsurgicaltechniqueinstitutionalexperienceandliteratureoverview AT majoiemarian vagusnervestimulationleadremovalorreplacementsurgicaltechniqueinstitutionalexperienceandliteratureoverview AT cornipserwinmj vagusnervestimulationleadremovalorreplacementsurgicaltechniqueinstitutionalexperienceandliteratureoverview |