Cargando…

Model-based adaptive phase I trial design of post-transplant decitabine maintenance in myelodysplastic syndrome

BACKGROUND: This report focuses on the adaptive phase I trial design aimed to find the clinically applicable dose for decitabine maintenance treatment after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and secondary acute myeloid leukemia....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Seunghoon, Kim, Yoo-Jin, Lee, Jongtae, Jeon, Sangil, Hong, Taegon, Park, Gab-jin, Yoon, Jae-Ho, Yahng, Seung-Ah, Shin, Seung-Hwan, Lee, Sung-Eun, Eom, Ki-Seong, Kim, Hee-Je, Min, Chang-Ki, Lee, Seok, Yim, Dong-Seok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4619308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26497198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13045-015-0208-3
_version_ 1782397072323903488
author Han, Seunghoon
Kim, Yoo-Jin
Lee, Jongtae
Jeon, Sangil
Hong, Taegon
Park, Gab-jin
Yoon, Jae-Ho
Yahng, Seung-Ah
Shin, Seung-Hwan
Lee, Sung-Eun
Eom, Ki-Seong
Kim, Hee-Je
Min, Chang-Ki
Lee, Seok
Yim, Dong-Seok
author_facet Han, Seunghoon
Kim, Yoo-Jin
Lee, Jongtae
Jeon, Sangil
Hong, Taegon
Park, Gab-jin
Yoon, Jae-Ho
Yahng, Seung-Ah
Shin, Seung-Hwan
Lee, Sung-Eun
Eom, Ki-Seong
Kim, Hee-Je
Min, Chang-Ki
Lee, Seok
Yim, Dong-Seok
author_sort Han, Seunghoon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This report focuses on the adaptive phase I trial design aimed to find the clinically applicable dose for decitabine maintenance treatment after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and secondary acute myeloid leukemia. METHODS: The first cohort (three patients) was given the same initial daily dose of decitabine (5 mg/m(2)/day, five consecutive days with 4-week intervals). In all cohorts, the doses for Cycles 2 to 4 were individualized using pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and simulations. The goal of dose individualization was to determine the maximum dose for each patient at which the occurrence of grade 4 (CTC-AE) toxicities for both platelet and neutrophil counts could be avoided. The initial doses for the following cohorts were also estimated with the data from the previous cohorts in the same manner. RESULTS: In all but one patient (14 out of 15), neutrophil count was the dose-limiting factor throughout the cycles. In cycles where doses were individualized, the median neutrophil nadir observed was 1100/mm(3) (grade 2) and grade 4 toxicity occurred in 5.1 % of all cycles (while it occurred in 36.8 % where doses were not individualized). The initial doses estimated for cohorts 2 to 5 were 4, 5, 5.5, and 5 mg/m(2)/day, respectively. The median maintenance dose was 7 mg/m(2)/day. CONCLUSIONS: We determined the acceptable starting dose and individualized the maintenance dose for each patient, while minimizing the toxicity using the adaptive approach. Currently, 5 mg/m(2)/day is considered to be the most appropriate starting dose for the regimen studied. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01277484
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4619308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46193082015-10-26 Model-based adaptive phase I trial design of post-transplant decitabine maintenance in myelodysplastic syndrome Han, Seunghoon Kim, Yoo-Jin Lee, Jongtae Jeon, Sangil Hong, Taegon Park, Gab-jin Yoon, Jae-Ho Yahng, Seung-Ah Shin, Seung-Hwan Lee, Sung-Eun Eom, Ki-Seong Kim, Hee-Je Min, Chang-Ki Lee, Seok Yim, Dong-Seok J Hematol Oncol Research BACKGROUND: This report focuses on the adaptive phase I trial design aimed to find the clinically applicable dose for decitabine maintenance treatment after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and secondary acute myeloid leukemia. METHODS: The first cohort (three patients) was given the same initial daily dose of decitabine (5 mg/m(2)/day, five consecutive days with 4-week intervals). In all cohorts, the doses for Cycles 2 to 4 were individualized using pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and simulations. The goal of dose individualization was to determine the maximum dose for each patient at which the occurrence of grade 4 (CTC-AE) toxicities for both platelet and neutrophil counts could be avoided. The initial doses for the following cohorts were also estimated with the data from the previous cohorts in the same manner. RESULTS: In all but one patient (14 out of 15), neutrophil count was the dose-limiting factor throughout the cycles. In cycles where doses were individualized, the median neutrophil nadir observed was 1100/mm(3) (grade 2) and grade 4 toxicity occurred in 5.1 % of all cycles (while it occurred in 36.8 % where doses were not individualized). The initial doses estimated for cohorts 2 to 5 were 4, 5, 5.5, and 5 mg/m(2)/day, respectively. The median maintenance dose was 7 mg/m(2)/day. CONCLUSIONS: We determined the acceptable starting dose and individualized the maintenance dose for each patient, while minimizing the toxicity using the adaptive approach. Currently, 5 mg/m(2)/day is considered to be the most appropriate starting dose for the regimen studied. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01277484 BioMed Central 2015-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4619308/ /pubmed/26497198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13045-015-0208-3 Text en © Han et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Han, Seunghoon
Kim, Yoo-Jin
Lee, Jongtae
Jeon, Sangil
Hong, Taegon
Park, Gab-jin
Yoon, Jae-Ho
Yahng, Seung-Ah
Shin, Seung-Hwan
Lee, Sung-Eun
Eom, Ki-Seong
Kim, Hee-Je
Min, Chang-Ki
Lee, Seok
Yim, Dong-Seok
Model-based adaptive phase I trial design of post-transplant decitabine maintenance in myelodysplastic syndrome
title Model-based adaptive phase I trial design of post-transplant decitabine maintenance in myelodysplastic syndrome
title_full Model-based adaptive phase I trial design of post-transplant decitabine maintenance in myelodysplastic syndrome
title_fullStr Model-based adaptive phase I trial design of post-transplant decitabine maintenance in myelodysplastic syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Model-based adaptive phase I trial design of post-transplant decitabine maintenance in myelodysplastic syndrome
title_short Model-based adaptive phase I trial design of post-transplant decitabine maintenance in myelodysplastic syndrome
title_sort model-based adaptive phase i trial design of post-transplant decitabine maintenance in myelodysplastic syndrome
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4619308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26497198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13045-015-0208-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hanseunghoon modelbasedadaptivephaseitrialdesignofposttransplantdecitabinemaintenanceinmyelodysplasticsyndrome
AT kimyoojin modelbasedadaptivephaseitrialdesignofposttransplantdecitabinemaintenanceinmyelodysplasticsyndrome
AT leejongtae modelbasedadaptivephaseitrialdesignofposttransplantdecitabinemaintenanceinmyelodysplasticsyndrome
AT jeonsangil modelbasedadaptivephaseitrialdesignofposttransplantdecitabinemaintenanceinmyelodysplasticsyndrome
AT hongtaegon modelbasedadaptivephaseitrialdesignofposttransplantdecitabinemaintenanceinmyelodysplasticsyndrome
AT parkgabjin modelbasedadaptivephaseitrialdesignofposttransplantdecitabinemaintenanceinmyelodysplasticsyndrome
AT yoonjaeho modelbasedadaptivephaseitrialdesignofposttransplantdecitabinemaintenanceinmyelodysplasticsyndrome
AT yahngseungah modelbasedadaptivephaseitrialdesignofposttransplantdecitabinemaintenanceinmyelodysplasticsyndrome
AT shinseunghwan modelbasedadaptivephaseitrialdesignofposttransplantdecitabinemaintenanceinmyelodysplasticsyndrome
AT leesungeun modelbasedadaptivephaseitrialdesignofposttransplantdecitabinemaintenanceinmyelodysplasticsyndrome
AT eomkiseong modelbasedadaptivephaseitrialdesignofposttransplantdecitabinemaintenanceinmyelodysplasticsyndrome
AT kimheeje modelbasedadaptivephaseitrialdesignofposttransplantdecitabinemaintenanceinmyelodysplasticsyndrome
AT minchangki modelbasedadaptivephaseitrialdesignofposttransplantdecitabinemaintenanceinmyelodysplasticsyndrome
AT leeseok modelbasedadaptivephaseitrialdesignofposttransplantdecitabinemaintenanceinmyelodysplasticsyndrome
AT yimdongseok modelbasedadaptivephaseitrialdesignofposttransplantdecitabinemaintenanceinmyelodysplasticsyndrome