Cargando…

How peer-review constrains cognition: on the frontline in the knowledge sector

Peer-review is neither reliable, fair, nor a valid basis for predicting ‘impact’: as quality control, peer-review is not fit for purpose. Endorsing the consensus, I offer a reframing: while a normative social process, peer-review also shapes the writing of a scientific paper. In so far as ‘cognition...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Cowley, Stephen J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4630500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579064
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01706