Cargando…
How peer-review constrains cognition: on the frontline in the knowledge sector
Peer-review is neither reliable, fair, nor a valid basis for predicting ‘impact’: as quality control, peer-review is not fit for purpose. Endorsing the consensus, I offer a reframing: while a normative social process, peer-review also shapes the writing of a scientific paper. In so far as ‘cognition...
Autor principal: | Cowley, Stephen J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4630500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579064 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01706 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Understanding of guest behavioral intentions in peer-to-peer accommodation sector
por: Ye, Ye, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Reading: How Readers Beget Imagining
por: Trasmundi, Sarah Bro, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Linguistic embodiment and verbal constraints: human cognition and the scales of time
por: Cowley, Stephen J.
Publicado: (2014) -
Peer Victimization and Aggressive Behavior Among Chinese Adolescents: Delinquent Peer Affiliation as a Mediator and Parental Knowledge as a Moderator
por: Lin, Shuang, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Constraining Dark Sectors with Monojets and Dijets
por: Chala, Mikael, et al.
Publicado: (2015)