Cargando…

Mathematical analysis of the sodium sensitivity of the human histamine H(3) receptor

PURPOSE: It was shown by several experimental studies that some G protein coupled receptors (GPCR) are sensitive to sodium ions. Furthermore, mutagenesis studies or the determination of crystal structures of the adenosine A(2A) or δ-opioid receptor revealed an allosteric Na(+) binding pocket near to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wittmann, Hans-Joachim, Seifert, Roland, Strasser, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4644138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27502620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40203-014-0001-y
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: It was shown by several experimental studies that some G protein coupled receptors (GPCR) are sensitive to sodium ions. Furthermore, mutagenesis studies or the determination of crystal structures of the adenosine A(2A) or δ-opioid receptor revealed an allosteric Na(+) binding pocket near to the highly conserved Asp(2.50). Within a previous study, the influence of NaCl concentration onto the steady-state GTPase activity at the human histamine H(3) receptor (hH(3)R) in presence of the endogenous histamine or the inverse agonist thioperamide was analyzed. The purpose of the present study was to examine and quantify the Na(+)-sensitivity of hH(3)R on a molecular level. METHODS: To achieve this, we developed a set of equations, describing constitutive activity and the different ligand-receptor equilibria in absence or presence of sodium ions. Furthermore, in order to gain a better understanding of the ligand- and Na(+)-binding to hH(3)R on molecular level, we performed molecular dynamic (MD) simulations. RESULTS: The analysis of the previously determined experimental steady-state GTPase data with the set of equations presented within this study, reveals that thioperamide binds into the orthosteric binding pocket of the hH(3)R in absence or presence of a Na(+) in its allosteric binding site. However, the data suggest that thioperamide binds preferentially into the hH(3)R in absence of a sodium ion in its allosteric site. These experimental results were supported by MD simulations of thioperamide in the binding pocket of the inactive hH(3)R. Furthermore, the MD simulations revealed two different binding modes for thioperamide in presence or absence of a Na(+) in its allosteric site. CONCLUSION: The mathematical model presented within this study describes the experimental data regarding the Na(+)-sensitivity of hH(3)R in an excellent manner. Although the present study is focused onto the Na(+)-sensitivity of the hH(3)R, the resulting equations, describing Na(+)- and ligand-binding to a GPCR, can be used for all other ion-sensitive GPCRs.