Cargando…
Compassionate Conversations
Staff engagement is much more than just a bonus in any organisation. CQC data shows that it is very clearly linked to positive results in both patient and staff outcomes (fewer complaints, improved safety, reduced sickness, fewer accidents, and more as per Michael West). Staff engagement may seem ne...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
British Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u204059.w2102 |
_version_ | 1782400898750742528 |
---|---|
author | Gardner, Sharryn Bray, Dominic |
author_facet | Gardner, Sharryn Bray, Dominic |
author_sort | Gardner, Sharryn |
collection | PubMed |
description | Staff engagement is much more than just a bonus in any organisation. CQC data shows that it is very clearly linked to positive results in both patient and staff outcomes (fewer complaints, improved safety, reduced sickness, fewer accidents, and more as per Michael West). Staff engagement may seem nebulous but is in fact measured routinely annually in the National Staff Survey. The problem is that often Trust Boards with poor Staff Survey results may struggle to increase staff engagement as staff see management initiatives as ‘management fads’ or ‘tick-box exercises’ purely for targets, not their own benefit. Compassionate Conversations are a ground-level initiative focused primarily on supporting and motivating individual staff as the primary focus. This allows the benefits to patients and in Human Resources to be an unspoken anticipated benefit. They are led by a Psychologist and Consultant in a coaching supportive atmosphere in an open or selected group. The Conversations have been rated 9/10 or higher by 64% of participants, while 75% of all participants voluntarily provided feedback. Feedback initially was that Conversations were too clinically-focused and further Conversations were more wide-ranging in topic and included departmental roadshows. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4645938 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | British Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46459382016-01-05 Compassionate Conversations Gardner, Sharryn Bray, Dominic BMJ Qual Improv Rep BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Staff engagement is much more than just a bonus in any organisation. CQC data shows that it is very clearly linked to positive results in both patient and staff outcomes (fewer complaints, improved safety, reduced sickness, fewer accidents, and more as per Michael West). Staff engagement may seem nebulous but is in fact measured routinely annually in the National Staff Survey. The problem is that often Trust Boards with poor Staff Survey results may struggle to increase staff engagement as staff see management initiatives as ‘management fads’ or ‘tick-box exercises’ purely for targets, not their own benefit. Compassionate Conversations are a ground-level initiative focused primarily on supporting and motivating individual staff as the primary focus. This allows the benefits to patients and in Human Resources to be an unspoken anticipated benefit. They are led by a Psychologist and Consultant in a coaching supportive atmosphere in an open or selected group. The Conversations have been rated 9/10 or higher by 64% of participants, while 75% of all participants voluntarily provided feedback. Feedback initially was that Conversations were too clinically-focused and further Conversations were more wide-ranging in topic and included departmental roadshows. British Publishing Group 2014-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4645938/ /pubmed/26734308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u204059.w2102 Text en © 2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode |
spellingShingle | BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Gardner, Sharryn Bray, Dominic Compassionate Conversations |
title | Compassionate Conversations |
title_full | Compassionate Conversations |
title_fullStr | Compassionate Conversations |
title_full_unstemmed | Compassionate Conversations |
title_short | Compassionate Conversations |
title_sort | compassionate conversations |
topic | BMJ Quality Improvement Programme |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u204059.w2102 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gardnersharryn compassionateconversations AT braydominic compassionateconversations |