Cargando…

Does the importance of dietary costs for fruit and vegetable intake vary by socioeconomic position?

Evidence suggests that diets meeting recommendations for fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake are more costly. Dietary costs may be a greater constraint on the diet quality of people of lower socioeconomic position (SEP). The aim of this study was to examine whether dietary costs are more strongly a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mackenbach, Joreintje D., Brage, Soren, Forouhi, Nita G., Griffin, Simon J., Wareham, Nicholas J., Monsivais, Pablo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4657115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26353803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007114515003025
_version_ 1782402339989094400
author Mackenbach, Joreintje D.
Brage, Soren
Forouhi, Nita G.
Griffin, Simon J.
Wareham, Nicholas J.
Monsivais, Pablo
author_facet Mackenbach, Joreintje D.
Brage, Soren
Forouhi, Nita G.
Griffin, Simon J.
Wareham, Nicholas J.
Monsivais, Pablo
author_sort Mackenbach, Joreintje D.
collection PubMed
description Evidence suggests that diets meeting recommendations for fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake are more costly. Dietary costs may be a greater constraint on the diet quality of people of lower socioeconomic position (SEP). The aim of this study was to examine whether dietary costs are more strongly associated with F&V intake in lower-SEP groups than in higher-SEP groups. Data on individual participants’ education and income were available from a population-based, cross-sectional study of 10 020 British adults. F&V intake and dietary costs (GBP/d) were derived from a semi-quantitative FFQ. Dietary cost estimates were based on UK food prices. General linear models were used to assess associations between SEP, quartiles of dietary costs and F&V intake. Effect modification of SEP gradients by dietary costs was examined with interaction terms. Analysis demonstrated that individuals with lowest quartile dietary costs, low income and low education consumed less F&V than individuals with higher dietary costs, high income and high education. Significant interaction between SEP and dietary costs indicated that the association between dietary costs and F&V intake was stronger for less-educated and lower-income groups. That is, socioeconomic differences in F&V intake were magnified among individuals who consumed lowest-cost diets. Such amplification of socioeconomic inequalities in diet among those consuming low-cost diets indicates the need to address food costs in strategies to promote healthy diets. In addition, the absence of socioeconomic inequalities for individuals with high dietary costs suggests that high dietary costs can compensate for lack of other material, or psychosocial resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4657115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46571152015-12-02 Does the importance of dietary costs for fruit and vegetable intake vary by socioeconomic position? Mackenbach, Joreintje D. Brage, Soren Forouhi, Nita G. Griffin, Simon J. Wareham, Nicholas J. Monsivais, Pablo Br J Nutr Full Papers Evidence suggests that diets meeting recommendations for fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake are more costly. Dietary costs may be a greater constraint on the diet quality of people of lower socioeconomic position (SEP). The aim of this study was to examine whether dietary costs are more strongly associated with F&V intake in lower-SEP groups than in higher-SEP groups. Data on individual participants’ education and income were available from a population-based, cross-sectional study of 10 020 British adults. F&V intake and dietary costs (GBP/d) were derived from a semi-quantitative FFQ. Dietary cost estimates were based on UK food prices. General linear models were used to assess associations between SEP, quartiles of dietary costs and F&V intake. Effect modification of SEP gradients by dietary costs was examined with interaction terms. Analysis demonstrated that individuals with lowest quartile dietary costs, low income and low education consumed less F&V than individuals with higher dietary costs, high income and high education. Significant interaction between SEP and dietary costs indicated that the association between dietary costs and F&V intake was stronger for less-educated and lower-income groups. That is, socioeconomic differences in F&V intake were magnified among individuals who consumed lowest-cost diets. Such amplification of socioeconomic inequalities in diet among those consuming low-cost diets indicates the need to address food costs in strategies to promote healthy diets. In addition, the absence of socioeconomic inequalities for individuals with high dietary costs suggests that high dietary costs can compensate for lack of other material, or psychosocial resources. Cambridge University Press 2015-09-10 2015-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4657115/ /pubmed/26353803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007114515003025 Text en © The Authors 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
spellingShingle Full Papers
Mackenbach, Joreintje D.
Brage, Soren
Forouhi, Nita G.
Griffin, Simon J.
Wareham, Nicholas J.
Monsivais, Pablo
Does the importance of dietary costs for fruit and vegetable intake vary by socioeconomic position?
title Does the importance of dietary costs for fruit and vegetable intake vary by socioeconomic position?
title_full Does the importance of dietary costs for fruit and vegetable intake vary by socioeconomic position?
title_fullStr Does the importance of dietary costs for fruit and vegetable intake vary by socioeconomic position?
title_full_unstemmed Does the importance of dietary costs for fruit and vegetable intake vary by socioeconomic position?
title_short Does the importance of dietary costs for fruit and vegetable intake vary by socioeconomic position?
title_sort does the importance of dietary costs for fruit and vegetable intake vary by socioeconomic position?
topic Full Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4657115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26353803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007114515003025
work_keys_str_mv AT mackenbachjoreintjed doestheimportanceofdietarycostsforfruitandvegetableintakevarybysocioeconomicposition
AT bragesoren doestheimportanceofdietarycostsforfruitandvegetableintakevarybysocioeconomicposition
AT forouhinitag doestheimportanceofdietarycostsforfruitandvegetableintakevarybysocioeconomicposition
AT griffinsimonj doestheimportanceofdietarycostsforfruitandvegetableintakevarybysocioeconomicposition
AT warehamnicholasj doestheimportanceofdietarycostsforfruitandvegetableintakevarybysocioeconomicposition
AT monsivaispablo doestheimportanceofdietarycostsforfruitandvegetableintakevarybysocioeconomicposition