Cargando…
Introducing Computer-Based Testing in High-Stakes Exams in Higher Education: Results of a Field Experiment
The introduction of computer-based testing in high-stakes examining in higher education is developing rather slowly due to institutional barriers (the need of extra facilities, ensuring test security) and teacher and student acceptance. From the existing literature it is unclear whether computer-bas...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4671535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26641632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143616 |
_version_ | 1782404409909575680 |
---|---|
author | Boevé, Anja J. Meijer, Rob R. Albers, Casper J. Beetsma, Yta Bosker, Roel J. |
author_facet | Boevé, Anja J. Meijer, Rob R. Albers, Casper J. Beetsma, Yta Bosker, Roel J. |
author_sort | Boevé, Anja J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The introduction of computer-based testing in high-stakes examining in higher education is developing rather slowly due to institutional barriers (the need of extra facilities, ensuring test security) and teacher and student acceptance. From the existing literature it is unclear whether computer-based exams will result in similar results as paper-based exams and whether student acceptance can change as a result of administering computer-based exams. In this study, we compared results from a computer-based and paper-based exam in a sample of psychology students and found no differences in total scores across the two modes. Furthermore, we investigated student acceptance and change in acceptance of computer-based examining. After taking the computer-based exam, fifty percent of the students preferred paper-and-pencil exams over computer-based exams and about a quarter preferred a computer-based exam. We conclude that computer-based exam total scores are similar as paper-based exam scores, but that for the acceptance of high-stakes computer-based exams it is important that students practice and get familiar with this new mode of test administration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4671535 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46715352015-12-10 Introducing Computer-Based Testing in High-Stakes Exams in Higher Education: Results of a Field Experiment Boevé, Anja J. Meijer, Rob R. Albers, Casper J. Beetsma, Yta Bosker, Roel J. PLoS One Research Article The introduction of computer-based testing in high-stakes examining in higher education is developing rather slowly due to institutional barriers (the need of extra facilities, ensuring test security) and teacher and student acceptance. From the existing literature it is unclear whether computer-based exams will result in similar results as paper-based exams and whether student acceptance can change as a result of administering computer-based exams. In this study, we compared results from a computer-based and paper-based exam in a sample of psychology students and found no differences in total scores across the two modes. Furthermore, we investigated student acceptance and change in acceptance of computer-based examining. After taking the computer-based exam, fifty percent of the students preferred paper-and-pencil exams over computer-based exams and about a quarter preferred a computer-based exam. We conclude that computer-based exam total scores are similar as paper-based exam scores, but that for the acceptance of high-stakes computer-based exams it is important that students practice and get familiar with this new mode of test administration. Public Library of Science 2015-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4671535/ /pubmed/26641632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143616 Text en © 2015 Boevé et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Boevé, Anja J. Meijer, Rob R. Albers, Casper J. Beetsma, Yta Bosker, Roel J. Introducing Computer-Based Testing in High-Stakes Exams in Higher Education: Results of a Field Experiment |
title | Introducing Computer-Based Testing in High-Stakes Exams in Higher Education: Results of a Field Experiment |
title_full | Introducing Computer-Based Testing in High-Stakes Exams in Higher Education: Results of a Field Experiment |
title_fullStr | Introducing Computer-Based Testing in High-Stakes Exams in Higher Education: Results of a Field Experiment |
title_full_unstemmed | Introducing Computer-Based Testing in High-Stakes Exams in Higher Education: Results of a Field Experiment |
title_short | Introducing Computer-Based Testing in High-Stakes Exams in Higher Education: Results of a Field Experiment |
title_sort | introducing computer-based testing in high-stakes exams in higher education: results of a field experiment |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4671535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26641632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143616 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boeveanjaj introducingcomputerbasedtestinginhighstakesexamsinhighereducationresultsofafieldexperiment AT meijerrobr introducingcomputerbasedtestinginhighstakesexamsinhighereducationresultsofafieldexperiment AT alberscasperj introducingcomputerbasedtestinginhighstakesexamsinhighereducationresultsofafieldexperiment AT beetsmayta introducingcomputerbasedtestinginhighstakesexamsinhighereducationresultsofafieldexperiment AT boskerroelj introducingcomputerbasedtestinginhighstakesexamsinhighereducationresultsofafieldexperiment |