Cargando…

Guidelines: the do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education

INTRODUCTION: The guidelines offered in this paper aim to amalgamate the literature on formative feedback into practical Do’s, Don’ts and Don’t Knows for individual clinical supervisors and for the institutions that support clinical learning. METHODS: The authors built consensus by an iterative proc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lefroy, Janet, Watling, Chris, Teunissen, Pim W., Brand, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4673072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26621488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0231-7
_version_ 1782404660297990144
author Lefroy, Janet
Watling, Chris
Teunissen, Pim W.
Brand, Paul
author_facet Lefroy, Janet
Watling, Chris
Teunissen, Pim W.
Brand, Paul
author_sort Lefroy, Janet
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The guidelines offered in this paper aim to amalgamate the literature on formative feedback into practical Do’s, Don’ts and Don’t Knows for individual clinical supervisors and for the institutions that support clinical learning. METHODS: The authors built consensus by an iterative process. Do’s and Don’ts were proposed based on authors’ individual teaching experience and awareness of the literature, and the amalgamated set of guidelines were then refined by all authors and the evidence was summarized for each guideline. Don’t Knows were identified as being important questions to this international group of educators which if answered would change practice. The criteria for inclusion of evidence for these guidelines were not those of a systematic review, so indicators of strength of these recommendations were developed which combine the evidence with the authors’ consensus. RESULTS: A set of 32 Do and Don’t guidelines with the important Don’t Knows was compiled along with a summary of the evidence for each. These are divided into guidelines for the individual clinical supervisor giving feedback to their trainee (recommendations about both the process and the content of feedback) and guidelines for the learning culture (what elements of learning culture support the exchange of meaningful feedback, and what elements constrain it?) CONCLUSION: Feedback is not easy to get right, but it is essential to learning in medicine, and there is a wealth of evidence supporting the Do’s and warning against the Don’ts. Further research into the critical Don’t Knows of feedback is required. A new definition is offered: Helpful feedback is a supportive conversation that clarifies the trainee’s awareness of their developing competencies, enhances their self-efficacy for making progress, challenges them to set objectives for improvement, and facilitates their development of strategies to enable that improvement to occur. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi: 10.1007/s40037-015-0231-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4673072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46730722015-12-16 Guidelines: the do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education Lefroy, Janet Watling, Chris Teunissen, Pim W. Brand, Paul Perspect Med Educ Guidelines INTRODUCTION: The guidelines offered in this paper aim to amalgamate the literature on formative feedback into practical Do’s, Don’ts and Don’t Knows for individual clinical supervisors and for the institutions that support clinical learning. METHODS: The authors built consensus by an iterative process. Do’s and Don’ts were proposed based on authors’ individual teaching experience and awareness of the literature, and the amalgamated set of guidelines were then refined by all authors and the evidence was summarized for each guideline. Don’t Knows were identified as being important questions to this international group of educators which if answered would change practice. The criteria for inclusion of evidence for these guidelines were not those of a systematic review, so indicators of strength of these recommendations were developed which combine the evidence with the authors’ consensus. RESULTS: A set of 32 Do and Don’t guidelines with the important Don’t Knows was compiled along with a summary of the evidence for each. These are divided into guidelines for the individual clinical supervisor giving feedback to their trainee (recommendations about both the process and the content of feedback) and guidelines for the learning culture (what elements of learning culture support the exchange of meaningful feedback, and what elements constrain it?) CONCLUSION: Feedback is not easy to get right, but it is essential to learning in medicine, and there is a wealth of evidence supporting the Do’s and warning against the Don’ts. Further research into the critical Don’t Knows of feedback is required. A new definition is offered: Helpful feedback is a supportive conversation that clarifies the trainee’s awareness of their developing competencies, enhances their self-efficacy for making progress, challenges them to set objectives for improvement, and facilitates their development of strategies to enable that improvement to occur. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi: 10.1007/s40037-015-0231-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2015-11-30 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4673072/ /pubmed/26621488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0231-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Guidelines
Lefroy, Janet
Watling, Chris
Teunissen, Pim W.
Brand, Paul
Guidelines: the do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education
title Guidelines: the do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education
title_full Guidelines: the do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education
title_fullStr Guidelines: the do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education
title_full_unstemmed Guidelines: the do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education
title_short Guidelines: the do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education
title_sort guidelines: the do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education
topic Guidelines
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4673072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26621488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0231-7
work_keys_str_mv AT lefroyjanet guidelinesthedosdontsanddontknowsoffeedbackforclinicaleducation
AT watlingchris guidelinesthedosdontsanddontknowsoffeedbackforclinicaleducation
AT teunissenpimw guidelinesthedosdontsanddontknowsoffeedbackforclinicaleducation
AT brandpaul guidelinesthedosdontsanddontknowsoffeedbackforclinicaleducation