Cargando…

Practising what we preach: using cognitive load theory for workshop design and evaluation

Theory-based instructional design is a top priority in medical education. The goal of this Show and Tell article is to present our theory-driven approach to the design of instruction for clinical educators. We adopted cognitive load theory as a framework to design and evaluate a series of profession...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naismith, Laura M., Haji, Faizal A., Sibbald, Matthew, Cheung, Jeffrey J. H., Tavares, Walter, Cavalcanti, Rodrigo B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4673075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26490056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0221-9
_version_ 1782404660995293184
author Naismith, Laura M.
Haji, Faizal A.
Sibbald, Matthew
Cheung, Jeffrey J. H.
Tavares, Walter
Cavalcanti, Rodrigo B.
author_facet Naismith, Laura M.
Haji, Faizal A.
Sibbald, Matthew
Cheung, Jeffrey J. H.
Tavares, Walter
Cavalcanti, Rodrigo B.
author_sort Naismith, Laura M.
collection PubMed
description Theory-based instructional design is a top priority in medical education. The goal of this Show and Tell article is to present our theory-driven approach to the design of instruction for clinical educators. We adopted cognitive load theory as a framework to design and evaluate a series of professional development workshops that were delivered at local, national and international academic conferences in 2014. We used two rating scales to measure participantsʼ cognitive load. Participants also provided narrative comments as to how the workshops could be improved. Cognitive load ratings from 59 participants suggested that the workshop design optimized learning by managing complexity for different levels of learners (intrinsic load), stimulating cognitive processing for long-term memory storage (germane load), and minimizing irrelevant distracters (extraneous load). Narrative comments could also be classified as representing intrinsic, extraneous, or germane load, which provided specific directions for ongoing quality improvement. These results demonstrate that a cognitive load theory approach to workshop design and evaluation is feasible and useful in the context of medical education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4673075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46730752015-12-16 Practising what we preach: using cognitive load theory for workshop design and evaluation Naismith, Laura M. Haji, Faizal A. Sibbald, Matthew Cheung, Jeffrey J. H. Tavares, Walter Cavalcanti, Rodrigo B. Perspect Med Educ Show and Tell Theory-based instructional design is a top priority in medical education. The goal of this Show and Tell article is to present our theory-driven approach to the design of instruction for clinical educators. We adopted cognitive load theory as a framework to design and evaluate a series of professional development workshops that were delivered at local, national and international academic conferences in 2014. We used two rating scales to measure participantsʼ cognitive load. Participants also provided narrative comments as to how the workshops could be improved. Cognitive load ratings from 59 participants suggested that the workshop design optimized learning by managing complexity for different levels of learners (intrinsic load), stimulating cognitive processing for long-term memory storage (germane load), and minimizing irrelevant distracters (extraneous load). Narrative comments could also be classified as representing intrinsic, extraneous, or germane load, which provided specific directions for ongoing quality improvement. These results demonstrate that a cognitive load theory approach to workshop design and evaluation is feasible and useful in the context of medical education. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2015-10-21 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4673075/ /pubmed/26490056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0221-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Show and Tell
Naismith, Laura M.
Haji, Faizal A.
Sibbald, Matthew
Cheung, Jeffrey J. H.
Tavares, Walter
Cavalcanti, Rodrigo B.
Practising what we preach: using cognitive load theory for workshop design and evaluation
title Practising what we preach: using cognitive load theory for workshop design and evaluation
title_full Practising what we preach: using cognitive load theory for workshop design and evaluation
title_fullStr Practising what we preach: using cognitive load theory for workshop design and evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Practising what we preach: using cognitive load theory for workshop design and evaluation
title_short Practising what we preach: using cognitive load theory for workshop design and evaluation
title_sort practising what we preach: using cognitive load theory for workshop design and evaluation
topic Show and Tell
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4673075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26490056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0221-9
work_keys_str_mv AT naismithlauram practisingwhatwepreachusingcognitiveloadtheoryforworkshopdesignandevaluation
AT hajifaizala practisingwhatwepreachusingcognitiveloadtheoryforworkshopdesignandevaluation
AT sibbaldmatthew practisingwhatwepreachusingcognitiveloadtheoryforworkshopdesignandevaluation
AT cheungjeffreyjh practisingwhatwepreachusingcognitiveloadtheoryforworkshopdesignandevaluation
AT tavareswalter practisingwhatwepreachusingcognitiveloadtheoryforworkshopdesignandevaluation
AT cavalcantirodrigob practisingwhatwepreachusingcognitiveloadtheoryforworkshopdesignandevaluation