Cargando…

DNA repair prognostic index modelling reveals an essential role for base excision repair in influencing clinical outcomes in ER negative and triple negative breast cancers

Stratification of oestrogen receptor (ER) negative and triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs) is urgently needed. In the current study, a cohort of 880 ER- (including 635 TNBCs) was immuno-profiled for a panel of DNA repair proteins including: Pol β, FEN1, APE1, XRCC1, SMUG1, PARP1, BRCA1, ATR, ATM,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdel-Fatah, Tarek M.A., Arora, Arvind, Moseley, Paul M., Perry, Christina, Rakha, Emad A., Green, Andrew R., Chan, Stephen Y.T., Ellis, Ian O., Madhusudan, Srinivasan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4673139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26267318
_version_ 1782404675249635328
author Abdel-Fatah, Tarek M.A.
Arora, Arvind
Moseley, Paul M.
Perry, Christina
Rakha, Emad A.
Green, Andrew R.
Chan, Stephen Y.T.
Ellis, Ian O.
Madhusudan, Srinivasan
author_facet Abdel-Fatah, Tarek M.A.
Arora, Arvind
Moseley, Paul M.
Perry, Christina
Rakha, Emad A.
Green, Andrew R.
Chan, Stephen Y.T.
Ellis, Ian O.
Madhusudan, Srinivasan
author_sort Abdel-Fatah, Tarek M.A.
collection PubMed
description Stratification of oestrogen receptor (ER) negative and triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs) is urgently needed. In the current study, a cohort of 880 ER- (including 635 TNBCs) was immuno-profiled for a panel of DNA repair proteins including: Pol β, FEN1, APE1, XRCC1, SMUG1, PARP1, BRCA1, ATR, ATM, DNA-PKcs, Chk1, Chk2, p53, and TOPO2. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models (with backward stepwise exclusion of these factors, using a criterion of p < 0.05 for retention of factors in the model) were used to identify factors that were independently associated with clinical outcomes. XRCC1 (p = 0.002), pol β (p = 0.032) FEN1 (p = 0.001) and BRCA1 (p = 0.040) levels were independently associated with poor BCSS. Subsequently, DNA repair index prognostic (DRPI) scores for breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) were calculated and two prognostic groups (DRPI-PGs) were identified. Patients in prognostic group 2 (DRPI-PG2) have higher risk of death (p < 0.001). Furthermore, in DRPI-PG2 patients, exposure to anthracycline reduced the risk of death [(HR (95% CI) = 0.79 (0.64–0.98), p = 0.032) by 21–26%. In addition, DRPI-PG2 patients have adverse clinicopathological features including higher grade, lympho-vascular invasion, Her-2 positive phenotype, compared to those in DRPI-PG1 (p < 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves indicated that the DRPI outperformed the currently used prognostic factors and adding DRPI to lymph node stage significantly improved their performance as a predictor for BCSS [p < 0.00001, area under curve (AUC) = 0.70]. BER strongly influences pathogenesis of ER- and TNBCs. The DRPI accurately predicts BCSS and can also serve as a valuable prognostic and predictive tool for TNBCs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4673139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46731392015-12-23 DNA repair prognostic index modelling reveals an essential role for base excision repair in influencing clinical outcomes in ER negative and triple negative breast cancers Abdel-Fatah, Tarek M.A. Arora, Arvind Moseley, Paul M. Perry, Christina Rakha, Emad A. Green, Andrew R. Chan, Stephen Y.T. Ellis, Ian O. Madhusudan, Srinivasan Oncotarget Research Paper Stratification of oestrogen receptor (ER) negative and triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs) is urgently needed. In the current study, a cohort of 880 ER- (including 635 TNBCs) was immuno-profiled for a panel of DNA repair proteins including: Pol β, FEN1, APE1, XRCC1, SMUG1, PARP1, BRCA1, ATR, ATM, DNA-PKcs, Chk1, Chk2, p53, and TOPO2. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models (with backward stepwise exclusion of these factors, using a criterion of p < 0.05 for retention of factors in the model) were used to identify factors that were independently associated with clinical outcomes. XRCC1 (p = 0.002), pol β (p = 0.032) FEN1 (p = 0.001) and BRCA1 (p = 0.040) levels were independently associated with poor BCSS. Subsequently, DNA repair index prognostic (DRPI) scores for breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) were calculated and two prognostic groups (DRPI-PGs) were identified. Patients in prognostic group 2 (DRPI-PG2) have higher risk of death (p < 0.001). Furthermore, in DRPI-PG2 patients, exposure to anthracycline reduced the risk of death [(HR (95% CI) = 0.79 (0.64–0.98), p = 0.032) by 21–26%. In addition, DRPI-PG2 patients have adverse clinicopathological features including higher grade, lympho-vascular invasion, Her-2 positive phenotype, compared to those in DRPI-PG1 (p < 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves indicated that the DRPI outperformed the currently used prognostic factors and adding DRPI to lymph node stage significantly improved their performance as a predictor for BCSS [p < 0.00001, area under curve (AUC) = 0.70]. BER strongly influences pathogenesis of ER- and TNBCs. The DRPI accurately predicts BCSS and can also serve as a valuable prognostic and predictive tool for TNBCs. Impact Journals LLC 2015-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4673139/ /pubmed/26267318 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Abdel-Fatah et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Abdel-Fatah, Tarek M.A.
Arora, Arvind
Moseley, Paul M.
Perry, Christina
Rakha, Emad A.
Green, Andrew R.
Chan, Stephen Y.T.
Ellis, Ian O.
Madhusudan, Srinivasan
DNA repair prognostic index modelling reveals an essential role for base excision repair in influencing clinical outcomes in ER negative and triple negative breast cancers
title DNA repair prognostic index modelling reveals an essential role for base excision repair in influencing clinical outcomes in ER negative and triple negative breast cancers
title_full DNA repair prognostic index modelling reveals an essential role for base excision repair in influencing clinical outcomes in ER negative and triple negative breast cancers
title_fullStr DNA repair prognostic index modelling reveals an essential role for base excision repair in influencing clinical outcomes in ER negative and triple negative breast cancers
title_full_unstemmed DNA repair prognostic index modelling reveals an essential role for base excision repair in influencing clinical outcomes in ER negative and triple negative breast cancers
title_short DNA repair prognostic index modelling reveals an essential role for base excision repair in influencing clinical outcomes in ER negative and triple negative breast cancers
title_sort dna repair prognostic index modelling reveals an essential role for base excision repair in influencing clinical outcomes in er negative and triple negative breast cancers
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4673139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26267318
work_keys_str_mv AT abdelfatahtarekma dnarepairprognosticindexmodellingrevealsanessentialroleforbaseexcisionrepairininfluencingclinicaloutcomesinernegativeandtriplenegativebreastcancers
AT aroraarvind dnarepairprognosticindexmodellingrevealsanessentialroleforbaseexcisionrepairininfluencingclinicaloutcomesinernegativeandtriplenegativebreastcancers
AT moseleypaulm dnarepairprognosticindexmodellingrevealsanessentialroleforbaseexcisionrepairininfluencingclinicaloutcomesinernegativeandtriplenegativebreastcancers
AT perrychristina dnarepairprognosticindexmodellingrevealsanessentialroleforbaseexcisionrepairininfluencingclinicaloutcomesinernegativeandtriplenegativebreastcancers
AT rakhaemada dnarepairprognosticindexmodellingrevealsanessentialroleforbaseexcisionrepairininfluencingclinicaloutcomesinernegativeandtriplenegativebreastcancers
AT greenandrewr dnarepairprognosticindexmodellingrevealsanessentialroleforbaseexcisionrepairininfluencingclinicaloutcomesinernegativeandtriplenegativebreastcancers
AT chanstephenyt dnarepairprognosticindexmodellingrevealsanessentialroleforbaseexcisionrepairininfluencingclinicaloutcomesinernegativeandtriplenegativebreastcancers
AT ellisiano dnarepairprognosticindexmodellingrevealsanessentialroleforbaseexcisionrepairininfluencingclinicaloutcomesinernegativeandtriplenegativebreastcancers
AT madhusudansrinivasan dnarepairprognosticindexmodellingrevealsanessentialroleforbaseexcisionrepairininfluencingclinicaloutcomesinernegativeandtriplenegativebreastcancers