Cargando…
Adverse Outcome Pathways can drive non-animal approaches for safety assessment
Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) provide an opportunity to develop new and more accurate safety assessment processes for drugs and other chemicals, and may ultimately play an important role in regulatory decision making. Not only can the development and application of AOPs pave the way for the develo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4682468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25943792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jat.3165 |
_version_ | 1782405897370206208 |
---|---|
author | Burden, Natalie Sewell, Fiona Andersen, Melvin E Boobis, Alan Chipman, J Kevin Cronin, Mark T D Hutchinson, Thomas H Kimber, Ian Whelan, Maurice |
author_facet | Burden, Natalie Sewell, Fiona Andersen, Melvin E Boobis, Alan Chipman, J Kevin Cronin, Mark T D Hutchinson, Thomas H Kimber, Ian Whelan, Maurice |
author_sort | Burden, Natalie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) provide an opportunity to develop new and more accurate safety assessment processes for drugs and other chemicals, and may ultimately play an important role in regulatory decision making. Not only can the development and application of AOPs pave the way for the development of improved evidence-based approaches for hazard and risk assessment, there is also the promise of a significant impact on animal welfare, with a reduced reliance on animal-based methods. The establishment of a useable and coherent knowledge framework under which AOPs will be developed and applied has been a first critical step towards realizing this opportunity. This article explores how the development of AOPs under this framework, and their application in practice, could benefit the science and practice of safety assessment, while in parallel stimulating a move away from traditional methods towards an increased acceptance of non-animal approaches. We discuss here the key areas where current, and future initiatives should be focused to enable the translation of AOPs into routine chemical safety assessment, and lasting 3Rs benefits. © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Applied Toxicology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This article explores how the development and application of Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) could benefit the science and practice of chemical safety assessment, with a particular focus on how their use in practice could reduce reliance on traditional animal toxicity tests. This includes discussion of the key areas where current and future initiatives should be focused to enable the translation of AOPs into routine chemical safety assessment, and lasting 3Rs benefits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4682468 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46824682015-12-23 Adverse Outcome Pathways can drive non-animal approaches for safety assessment Burden, Natalie Sewell, Fiona Andersen, Melvin E Boobis, Alan Chipman, J Kevin Cronin, Mark T D Hutchinson, Thomas H Kimber, Ian Whelan, Maurice J Appl Toxicol Hypothesis Review Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) provide an opportunity to develop new and more accurate safety assessment processes for drugs and other chemicals, and may ultimately play an important role in regulatory decision making. Not only can the development and application of AOPs pave the way for the development of improved evidence-based approaches for hazard and risk assessment, there is also the promise of a significant impact on animal welfare, with a reduced reliance on animal-based methods. The establishment of a useable and coherent knowledge framework under which AOPs will be developed and applied has been a first critical step towards realizing this opportunity. This article explores how the development of AOPs under this framework, and their application in practice, could benefit the science and practice of safety assessment, while in parallel stimulating a move away from traditional methods towards an increased acceptance of non-animal approaches. We discuss here the key areas where current, and future initiatives should be focused to enable the translation of AOPs into routine chemical safety assessment, and lasting 3Rs benefits. © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Applied Toxicology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This article explores how the development and application of Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) could benefit the science and practice of chemical safety assessment, with a particular focus on how their use in practice could reduce reliance on traditional animal toxicity tests. This includes discussion of the key areas where current and future initiatives should be focused to enable the translation of AOPs into routine chemical safety assessment, and lasting 3Rs benefits. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015-09 2015-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4682468/ /pubmed/25943792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jat.3165 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Applied Toxicology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Hypothesis Review Burden, Natalie Sewell, Fiona Andersen, Melvin E Boobis, Alan Chipman, J Kevin Cronin, Mark T D Hutchinson, Thomas H Kimber, Ian Whelan, Maurice Adverse Outcome Pathways can drive non-animal approaches for safety assessment |
title | Adverse Outcome Pathways can drive non-animal approaches for safety assessment |
title_full | Adverse Outcome Pathways can drive non-animal approaches for safety assessment |
title_fullStr | Adverse Outcome Pathways can drive non-animal approaches for safety assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Adverse Outcome Pathways can drive non-animal approaches for safety assessment |
title_short | Adverse Outcome Pathways can drive non-animal approaches for safety assessment |
title_sort | adverse outcome pathways can drive non-animal approaches for safety assessment |
topic | Hypothesis Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4682468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25943792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jat.3165 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burdennatalie adverseoutcomepathwayscandrivenonanimalapproachesforsafetyassessment AT sewellfiona adverseoutcomepathwayscandrivenonanimalapproachesforsafetyassessment AT andersenmelvine adverseoutcomepathwayscandrivenonanimalapproachesforsafetyassessment AT boobisalan adverseoutcomepathwayscandrivenonanimalapproachesforsafetyassessment AT chipmanjkevin adverseoutcomepathwayscandrivenonanimalapproachesforsafetyassessment AT croninmarktd adverseoutcomepathwayscandrivenonanimalapproachesforsafetyassessment AT hutchinsonthomash adverseoutcomepathwayscandrivenonanimalapproachesforsafetyassessment AT kimberian adverseoutcomepathwayscandrivenonanimalapproachesforsafetyassessment AT whelanmaurice adverseoutcomepathwayscandrivenonanimalapproachesforsafetyassessment |