Cargando…

Adverse Outcome Pathways can drive non-animal approaches for safety assessment

Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) provide an opportunity to develop new and more accurate safety assessment processes for drugs and other chemicals, and may ultimately play an important role in regulatory decision making. Not only can the development and application of AOPs pave the way for the develo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burden, Natalie, Sewell, Fiona, Andersen, Melvin E, Boobis, Alan, Chipman, J Kevin, Cronin, Mark T D, Hutchinson, Thomas H, Kimber, Ian, Whelan, Maurice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4682468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25943792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jat.3165
_version_ 1782405897370206208
author Burden, Natalie
Sewell, Fiona
Andersen, Melvin E
Boobis, Alan
Chipman, J Kevin
Cronin, Mark T D
Hutchinson, Thomas H
Kimber, Ian
Whelan, Maurice
author_facet Burden, Natalie
Sewell, Fiona
Andersen, Melvin E
Boobis, Alan
Chipman, J Kevin
Cronin, Mark T D
Hutchinson, Thomas H
Kimber, Ian
Whelan, Maurice
author_sort Burden, Natalie
collection PubMed
description Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) provide an opportunity to develop new and more accurate safety assessment processes for drugs and other chemicals, and may ultimately play an important role in regulatory decision making. Not only can the development and application of AOPs pave the way for the development of improved evidence-based approaches for hazard and risk assessment, there is also the promise of a significant impact on animal welfare, with a reduced reliance on animal-based methods. The establishment of a useable and coherent knowledge framework under which AOPs will be developed and applied has been a first critical step towards realizing this opportunity. This article explores how the development of AOPs under this framework, and their application in practice, could benefit the science and practice of safety assessment, while in parallel stimulating a move away from traditional methods towards an increased acceptance of non-animal approaches. We discuss here the key areas where current, and future initiatives should be focused to enable the translation of AOPs into routine chemical safety assessment, and lasting 3Rs benefits. © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Applied Toxicology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This article explores how the development and application of Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) could benefit the science and practice of chemical safety assessment, with a particular focus on how their use in practice could reduce reliance on traditional animal toxicity tests. This includes discussion of the key areas where current and future initiatives should be focused to enable the translation of AOPs into routine chemical safety assessment, and lasting 3Rs benefits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4682468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46824682015-12-23 Adverse Outcome Pathways can drive non-animal approaches for safety assessment Burden, Natalie Sewell, Fiona Andersen, Melvin E Boobis, Alan Chipman, J Kevin Cronin, Mark T D Hutchinson, Thomas H Kimber, Ian Whelan, Maurice J Appl Toxicol Hypothesis Review Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) provide an opportunity to develop new and more accurate safety assessment processes for drugs and other chemicals, and may ultimately play an important role in regulatory decision making. Not only can the development and application of AOPs pave the way for the development of improved evidence-based approaches for hazard and risk assessment, there is also the promise of a significant impact on animal welfare, with a reduced reliance on animal-based methods. The establishment of a useable and coherent knowledge framework under which AOPs will be developed and applied has been a first critical step towards realizing this opportunity. This article explores how the development of AOPs under this framework, and their application in practice, could benefit the science and practice of safety assessment, while in parallel stimulating a move away from traditional methods towards an increased acceptance of non-animal approaches. We discuss here the key areas where current, and future initiatives should be focused to enable the translation of AOPs into routine chemical safety assessment, and lasting 3Rs benefits. © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Applied Toxicology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This article explores how the development and application of Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) could benefit the science and practice of chemical safety assessment, with a particular focus on how their use in practice could reduce reliance on traditional animal toxicity tests. This includes discussion of the key areas where current and future initiatives should be focused to enable the translation of AOPs into routine chemical safety assessment, and lasting 3Rs benefits. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015-09 2015-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4682468/ /pubmed/25943792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jat.3165 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Applied Toxicology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Hypothesis Review
Burden, Natalie
Sewell, Fiona
Andersen, Melvin E
Boobis, Alan
Chipman, J Kevin
Cronin, Mark T D
Hutchinson, Thomas H
Kimber, Ian
Whelan, Maurice
Adverse Outcome Pathways can drive non-animal approaches for safety assessment
title Adverse Outcome Pathways can drive non-animal approaches for safety assessment
title_full Adverse Outcome Pathways can drive non-animal approaches for safety assessment
title_fullStr Adverse Outcome Pathways can drive non-animal approaches for safety assessment
title_full_unstemmed Adverse Outcome Pathways can drive non-animal approaches for safety assessment
title_short Adverse Outcome Pathways can drive non-animal approaches for safety assessment
title_sort adverse outcome pathways can drive non-animal approaches for safety assessment
topic Hypothesis Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4682468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25943792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jat.3165
work_keys_str_mv AT burdennatalie adverseoutcomepathwayscandrivenonanimalapproachesforsafetyassessment
AT sewellfiona adverseoutcomepathwayscandrivenonanimalapproachesforsafetyassessment
AT andersenmelvine adverseoutcomepathwayscandrivenonanimalapproachesforsafetyassessment
AT boobisalan adverseoutcomepathwayscandrivenonanimalapproachesforsafetyassessment
AT chipmanjkevin adverseoutcomepathwayscandrivenonanimalapproachesforsafetyassessment
AT croninmarktd adverseoutcomepathwayscandrivenonanimalapproachesforsafetyassessment
AT hutchinsonthomash adverseoutcomepathwayscandrivenonanimalapproachesforsafetyassessment
AT kimberian adverseoutcomepathwayscandrivenonanimalapproachesforsafetyassessment
AT whelanmaurice adverseoutcomepathwayscandrivenonanimalapproachesforsafetyassessment