Cargando…

Acute Effects of Different Agonist and Antagonist Stretching Arrangements on Static and Dynamic Range of Motion

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, stretching exercises are considered as basic components of warm up aiming to prepare the musculoskeletal system for performance and to prevent injuries. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of different agonist and antagonist stretching arrangem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amiri-Khorasani, Mohammadtaghi, Kellis, Eleftherios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4691313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26715975
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/asjsm.26844
_version_ 1782407135784599552
author Amiri-Khorasani, Mohammadtaghi
Kellis, Eleftherios
author_facet Amiri-Khorasani, Mohammadtaghi
Kellis, Eleftherios
author_sort Amiri-Khorasani, Mohammadtaghi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traditionally, stretching exercises are considered as basic components of warm up aiming to prepare the musculoskeletal system for performance and to prevent injuries. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of different agonist and antagonist stretching arrangements within a pre-exercise warm-up on hip static (SROM) and dynamic range of motion (DROM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty trained male subjects (Mean ± SD: height, 177.38 ± 6.92 cm; body mass, 68.4 ± 10.22 kg; age, 21.52 ± 1.17 years) volunteered to participate in this study. SROM was measured by V-sit test and DROM captured by a motion analysis system before and after (i) static stretching for both hip flexor and extensor muscles (SFSE), (ii) dynamic stretching for both hip flexor and extensor muscles (DFDE), (iii) static stretching for the hip flexors and dynamic stretching for hip extensors (SFDE), and (iv) dynamic stretching for the hip flexors and static stretching for hip extensors (DFSE). RESULTS: DFSE showed a significantly higher increase in DROM and SROM than the remainder of the stretching protocols (P < 0.05). There were significant differences between DFDE with SFSE and SFDE (P < 0.05) and SFSE showed significant increase as compared to SFDE (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, DFSE is probably the best stretching arrangement due to producing more post activation potentiation on agonist muscles and less muscle stiffness in antagonist muscles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4691313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Kowsar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46913132015-12-29 Acute Effects of Different Agonist and Antagonist Stretching Arrangements on Static and Dynamic Range of Motion Amiri-Khorasani, Mohammadtaghi Kellis, Eleftherios Asian J Sports Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Traditionally, stretching exercises are considered as basic components of warm up aiming to prepare the musculoskeletal system for performance and to prevent injuries. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of different agonist and antagonist stretching arrangements within a pre-exercise warm-up on hip static (SROM) and dynamic range of motion (DROM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty trained male subjects (Mean ± SD: height, 177.38 ± 6.92 cm; body mass, 68.4 ± 10.22 kg; age, 21.52 ± 1.17 years) volunteered to participate in this study. SROM was measured by V-sit test and DROM captured by a motion analysis system before and after (i) static stretching for both hip flexor and extensor muscles (SFSE), (ii) dynamic stretching for both hip flexor and extensor muscles (DFDE), (iii) static stretching for the hip flexors and dynamic stretching for hip extensors (SFDE), and (iv) dynamic stretching for the hip flexors and static stretching for hip extensors (DFSE). RESULTS: DFSE showed a significantly higher increase in DROM and SROM than the remainder of the stretching protocols (P < 0.05). There were significant differences between DFDE with SFSE and SFDE (P < 0.05) and SFSE showed significant increase as compared to SFDE (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, DFSE is probably the best stretching arrangement due to producing more post activation potentiation on agonist muscles and less muscle stiffness in antagonist muscles. Kowsar 2015-12-01 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4691313/ /pubmed/26715975 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/asjsm.26844 Text en Copyright © 2015, Sports Medicine Research Center. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Amiri-Khorasani, Mohammadtaghi
Kellis, Eleftherios
Acute Effects of Different Agonist and Antagonist Stretching Arrangements on Static and Dynamic Range of Motion
title Acute Effects of Different Agonist and Antagonist Stretching Arrangements on Static and Dynamic Range of Motion
title_full Acute Effects of Different Agonist and Antagonist Stretching Arrangements on Static and Dynamic Range of Motion
title_fullStr Acute Effects of Different Agonist and Antagonist Stretching Arrangements on Static and Dynamic Range of Motion
title_full_unstemmed Acute Effects of Different Agonist and Antagonist Stretching Arrangements on Static and Dynamic Range of Motion
title_short Acute Effects of Different Agonist and Antagonist Stretching Arrangements on Static and Dynamic Range of Motion
title_sort acute effects of different agonist and antagonist stretching arrangements on static and dynamic range of motion
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4691313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26715975
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/asjsm.26844
work_keys_str_mv AT amirikhorasanimohammadtaghi acuteeffectsofdifferentagonistandantagoniststretchingarrangementsonstaticanddynamicrangeofmotion
AT kelliseleftherios acuteeffectsofdifferentagonistandantagoniststretchingarrangementsonstaticanddynamicrangeofmotion