Cargando…
Can Chunk Size Differences Explain Developmental Changes in Lexical Learning?
In three experiments, we investigated Hebb repetition learning (HRL) differences between children and adults, as a function of the type of item (lexical vs. sub-lexical) and the level of item-overlap between sequences. In a first experiment, it was shown that when non-repeating and repeating (Hebb)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4703851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26779065 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01925 |
_version_ | 1782408792613322752 |
---|---|
author | Smalle, Eleonore H. M. Bogaerts, Louisa Simonis, Morgane Duyck, Wouter Page, Michael P. A. Edwards, Martin G. Szmalec, Arnaud |
author_facet | Smalle, Eleonore H. M. Bogaerts, Louisa Simonis, Morgane Duyck, Wouter Page, Michael P. A. Edwards, Martin G. Szmalec, Arnaud |
author_sort | Smalle, Eleonore H. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In three experiments, we investigated Hebb repetition learning (HRL) differences between children and adults, as a function of the type of item (lexical vs. sub-lexical) and the level of item-overlap between sequences. In a first experiment, it was shown that when non-repeating and repeating (Hebb) sequences of words were all permutations of the same words, HRL was slower than when the sequences shared no words. This item-overlap effect was observed in both children and adults. In a second experiment, we used syllable sequences and we observed reduced HRL due to item-overlap only in children. The findings are explained within a chunking account of the HRL effect on the basis of which we hypothesize that children, compared with adults, chunk syllable sequences in smaller units. By hypothesis, small chunks are more prone to interference from anagram representations included in the filler sequences, potentially explaining the item-overlap effect in children. This hypothesis was tested in a third experiment with adults where we experimentally manipulated the chunk size by embedding pauses in the syllable sequences. Interestingly, we showed that imposing a small chunk size caused adults to show the same behavioral effects as those observed in children. Departing from the analogy between verbal HRL and lexical development, the results are discussed in light of the less-is-more hypothesis of age-related differences in language acquisition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4703851 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47038512016-01-15 Can Chunk Size Differences Explain Developmental Changes in Lexical Learning? Smalle, Eleonore H. M. Bogaerts, Louisa Simonis, Morgane Duyck, Wouter Page, Michael P. A. Edwards, Martin G. Szmalec, Arnaud Front Psychol Psychology In three experiments, we investigated Hebb repetition learning (HRL) differences between children and adults, as a function of the type of item (lexical vs. sub-lexical) and the level of item-overlap between sequences. In a first experiment, it was shown that when non-repeating and repeating (Hebb) sequences of words were all permutations of the same words, HRL was slower than when the sequences shared no words. This item-overlap effect was observed in both children and adults. In a second experiment, we used syllable sequences and we observed reduced HRL due to item-overlap only in children. The findings are explained within a chunking account of the HRL effect on the basis of which we hypothesize that children, compared with adults, chunk syllable sequences in smaller units. By hypothesis, small chunks are more prone to interference from anagram representations included in the filler sequences, potentially explaining the item-overlap effect in children. This hypothesis was tested in a third experiment with adults where we experimentally manipulated the chunk size by embedding pauses in the syllable sequences. Interestingly, we showed that imposing a small chunk size caused adults to show the same behavioral effects as those observed in children. Departing from the analogy between verbal HRL and lexical development, the results are discussed in light of the less-is-more hypothesis of age-related differences in language acquisition. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4703851/ /pubmed/26779065 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01925 Text en Copyright © 2016 Smalle, Bogaerts, Simonis, Duyck, Page, Edwards and Szmalec. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Smalle, Eleonore H. M. Bogaerts, Louisa Simonis, Morgane Duyck, Wouter Page, Michael P. A. Edwards, Martin G. Szmalec, Arnaud Can Chunk Size Differences Explain Developmental Changes in Lexical Learning? |
title | Can Chunk Size Differences Explain Developmental Changes in Lexical Learning? |
title_full | Can Chunk Size Differences Explain Developmental Changes in Lexical Learning? |
title_fullStr | Can Chunk Size Differences Explain Developmental Changes in Lexical Learning? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can Chunk Size Differences Explain Developmental Changes in Lexical Learning? |
title_short | Can Chunk Size Differences Explain Developmental Changes in Lexical Learning? |
title_sort | can chunk size differences explain developmental changes in lexical learning? |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4703851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26779065 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01925 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smalleeleonorehm canchunksizedifferencesexplaindevelopmentalchangesinlexicallearning AT bogaertslouisa canchunksizedifferencesexplaindevelopmentalchangesinlexicallearning AT simonismorgane canchunksizedifferencesexplaindevelopmentalchangesinlexicallearning AT duyckwouter canchunksizedifferencesexplaindevelopmentalchangesinlexicallearning AT pagemichaelpa canchunksizedifferencesexplaindevelopmentalchangesinlexicallearning AT edwardsmarting canchunksizedifferencesexplaindevelopmentalchangesinlexicallearning AT szmalecarnaud canchunksizedifferencesexplaindevelopmentalchangesinlexicallearning |