Diagnosis of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer by minimal invasive biopsy techniques

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is widely used as an efficient breast cancer treatment. Ideally, a pathological complete response (pCR) can be achieved. Up to date, there is no reliable way of predicting a pCR. For the first time, we explore the ability of minimal invasive biopsy (MIB) t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heil, Joerg, Kümmel, Sherko, Schaefgen, Benedikt, Paepke, Stefan, Thomssen, Christoph, Rauch, Geraldine, Ataseven, Beyhan, Große, Regina, Dreesmann, Volker, Kühn, Thorsten, Loibl, Sibylle, Blohmer, Jens-Uwe, von Minckwitz, Gunter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4705891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26554654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.381
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is widely used as an efficient breast cancer treatment. Ideally, a pathological complete response (pCR) can be achieved. Up to date, there is no reliable way of predicting a pCR. For the first time, we explore the ability of minimal invasive biopsy (MIB) techniques to diagnose pCR in patients with clinical complete response (cCR) to NACT in this study. This question is of high clinical relevance because a reliable pCR prediction could have direct implications for clinical practice. METHODS: In all, 164 patients were included in this review-board approved, multicenter pooled analysis of prospectively assembled data. Core-cut (CC)-MIB or vacuum-assisted (VAB)-MIB were performed after NACT and before surgery. Negative predictive values (NPV) and false-negative rates (FNR) to predict a pCR in surgical specimen (diagnose pCR through MIB) were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: Pathological complete response in surgical specimen was diagnosed in 93 (56.7%) cases of the whole cohort. The NPV of the MIB diagnosis of pCR was 71.3% (95% CI: (63.3% 79.3%)). The FNR was 49.3% (95% CI: (40.4% 58.2%)). Existence of a clip marker tended to improve the NPV (odds ratio 1.98; 95% CI: (0.81; 4.85)). None of the mammographically guided VABs (n=16) was false-negative (FNR 0%, NPV 100%). CONCLUSIONS: Overall accuracy of MIB diagnosis of pCR was insufficient to suggest changing clinical practice. However, subgroup analyses (mammographically guided VABs) suggest a potential capacity of MIB techniques to precisely diagnose pCR after NACT. Representativity of MIB could be a crucial factor to be focused on in further analyses.