Cargando…
Evaluating the use of HILIC in large-scale, multi dimensional proteomics: Horses for courses?
Despite many recent advances in instrumentation, the sheer complexity of biological samples remains a major challenge in large-scale proteomics experiments, reflecting both the large number of protein isoforms and the wide dynamic range of their expression levels. However, while the dynamic range of...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4708065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26869852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2015.07.029 |
_version_ | 1782409393116020736 |
---|---|
author | Bensaddek, Dalila Nicolas, Armel Lamond, Angus I. |
author_facet | Bensaddek, Dalila Nicolas, Armel Lamond, Angus I. |
author_sort | Bensaddek, Dalila |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite many recent advances in instrumentation, the sheer complexity of biological samples remains a major challenge in large-scale proteomics experiments, reflecting both the large number of protein isoforms and the wide dynamic range of their expression levels. However, while the dynamic range of expression levels for different components of the proteome is estimated to be ∼10(7–8), the equivalent dynamic range of LC–MS is currently limited to ∼10(6). Sample pre-fractionation has therefore become routinely used in large-scale proteomics to reduce sample complexity during MS analysis and thus alleviate the problem of ion suppression and undersampling. There is currently a wide range of chromatographic techniques that can be applied as a first dimension separation. Here, we systematically evaluated the use of hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC), in comparison with hSAX, as a first dimension for peptide fractionation in a bottom-up proteomics workflow. The data indicate that in addition to its role as a useful pre-enrichment method for PTM analysis, HILIC can provide a robust, orthogonal and high-resolution method for increasing the depth of proteome coverage in large-scale proteomics experiments. The data also indicate that the choice of using either HILIC, hSAX, or other methods, is best made taking into account the specific types of biological analyses being performed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4708065 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47080652016-02-09 Evaluating the use of HILIC in large-scale, multi dimensional proteomics: Horses for courses? Bensaddek, Dalila Nicolas, Armel Lamond, Angus I. Int J Mass Spectrom Article Despite many recent advances in instrumentation, the sheer complexity of biological samples remains a major challenge in large-scale proteomics experiments, reflecting both the large number of protein isoforms and the wide dynamic range of their expression levels. However, while the dynamic range of expression levels for different components of the proteome is estimated to be ∼10(7–8), the equivalent dynamic range of LC–MS is currently limited to ∼10(6). Sample pre-fractionation has therefore become routinely used in large-scale proteomics to reduce sample complexity during MS analysis and thus alleviate the problem of ion suppression and undersampling. There is currently a wide range of chromatographic techniques that can be applied as a first dimension separation. Here, we systematically evaluated the use of hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC), in comparison with hSAX, as a first dimension for peptide fractionation in a bottom-up proteomics workflow. The data indicate that in addition to its role as a useful pre-enrichment method for PTM analysis, HILIC can provide a robust, orthogonal and high-resolution method for increasing the depth of proteome coverage in large-scale proteomics experiments. The data also indicate that the choice of using either HILIC, hSAX, or other methods, is best made taking into account the specific types of biological analyses being performed. Elsevier 2015-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4708065/ /pubmed/26869852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2015.07.029 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bensaddek, Dalila Nicolas, Armel Lamond, Angus I. Evaluating the use of HILIC in large-scale, multi dimensional proteomics: Horses for courses? |
title | Evaluating the use of HILIC in large-scale, multi dimensional proteomics: Horses for courses? |
title_full | Evaluating the use of HILIC in large-scale, multi dimensional proteomics: Horses for courses? |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the use of HILIC in large-scale, multi dimensional proteomics: Horses for courses? |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the use of HILIC in large-scale, multi dimensional proteomics: Horses for courses? |
title_short | Evaluating the use of HILIC in large-scale, multi dimensional proteomics: Horses for courses? |
title_sort | evaluating the use of hilic in large-scale, multi dimensional proteomics: horses for courses? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4708065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26869852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2015.07.029 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bensaddekdalila evaluatingtheuseofhilicinlargescalemultidimensionalproteomicshorsesforcourses AT nicolasarmel evaluatingtheuseofhilicinlargescalemultidimensionalproteomicshorsesforcourses AT lamondangusi evaluatingtheuseofhilicinlargescalemultidimensionalproteomicshorsesforcourses |