Cargando…

Contexts Control Negative Contrast and Restrict the Expression of Flavor Preference Conditioning

Consumption of a high concentration of sucrose can have either a detrimental, negative contrast effect or a facilitatory, preference conditioning effect on subsequent consumption of a low concentration of sucrose, depending on the cues that are present during consumption. The role of context and fla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Austen, Joseph M., Sanderson, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Psychological Association 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4708609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26752234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xan0000091
_version_ 1782409506330771456
author Austen, Joseph M.
Sanderson, David J.
author_facet Austen, Joseph M.
Sanderson, David J.
author_sort Austen, Joseph M.
collection PubMed
description Consumption of a high concentration of sucrose can have either a detrimental, negative contrast effect or a facilitatory, preference conditioning effect on subsequent consumption of a low concentration of sucrose, depending on the cues that are present during consumption. The role of context and flavor cues in determining these effects were studied using analysis of the microstructure of licking in mice. Exposure to a high concentration followed by exposure to a low concentration resulted in a transient reduction in mean lick cluster size, which was context dependent (Experiment 1). However, there was no change in the total number of licks or overall consumption. When a flavor that had previously been paired with a high concentration was paired with a low concentration, there was an increase in the total number of licks, and overall consumption, but no change in the mean lick cluster size (Experiment 2). Pairing a high concentration with a flavor in a particular context before pairing the context and flavor compound with a low concentration resulted in abolishing the expression of the flavor preference conditioning effect on the total number of licks and consumption (Experiment 3). These results demonstrate that although context and flavor cues have dissociable effects on licking behavior, their interaction has an antagonistic effect on the behavioral expression of memory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4708609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher American Psychological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47086092016-01-20 Contexts Control Negative Contrast and Restrict the Expression of Flavor Preference Conditioning Austen, Joseph M. Sanderson, David J. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn Article Consumption of a high concentration of sucrose can have either a detrimental, negative contrast effect or a facilitatory, preference conditioning effect on subsequent consumption of a low concentration of sucrose, depending on the cues that are present during consumption. The role of context and flavor cues in determining these effects were studied using analysis of the microstructure of licking in mice. Exposure to a high concentration followed by exposure to a low concentration resulted in a transient reduction in mean lick cluster size, which was context dependent (Experiment 1). However, there was no change in the total number of licks or overall consumption. When a flavor that had previously been paired with a high concentration was paired with a low concentration, there was an increase in the total number of licks, and overall consumption, but no change in the mean lick cluster size (Experiment 2). Pairing a high concentration with a flavor in a particular context before pairing the context and flavor compound with a low concentration resulted in abolishing the expression of the flavor preference conditioning effect on the total number of licks and consumption (Experiment 3). These results demonstrate that although context and flavor cues have dissociable effects on licking behavior, their interaction has an antagonistic effect on the behavioral expression of memory. American Psychological Association 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4708609/ /pubmed/26752234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xan0000091 Text en © 2016 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article has been published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s). Author(s) grant(s) the American Psychological Association the exclusive right to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher.
spellingShingle Article
Austen, Joseph M.
Sanderson, David J.
Contexts Control Negative Contrast and Restrict the Expression of Flavor Preference Conditioning
title Contexts Control Negative Contrast and Restrict the Expression of Flavor Preference Conditioning
title_full Contexts Control Negative Contrast and Restrict the Expression of Flavor Preference Conditioning
title_fullStr Contexts Control Negative Contrast and Restrict the Expression of Flavor Preference Conditioning
title_full_unstemmed Contexts Control Negative Contrast and Restrict the Expression of Flavor Preference Conditioning
title_short Contexts Control Negative Contrast and Restrict the Expression of Flavor Preference Conditioning
title_sort contexts control negative contrast and restrict the expression of flavor preference conditioning
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4708609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26752234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xan0000091
work_keys_str_mv AT austenjosephm contextscontrolnegativecontrastandrestricttheexpressionofflavorpreferenceconditioning
AT sandersondavidj contextscontrolnegativecontrastandrestricttheexpressionofflavorpreferenceconditioning