Cargando…

Accuracy of bite mark analysis from food substances: A comparative study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aims and objectives of the study were to compare the accuracy of bite mark analysis from three different food substances-apple, cheese and chocolate using two techniques-the manual docking procedure and computer assisted overlay generation technique and to compare the accura...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daniel, M. Jonathan, Pazhani, Ambiga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4714411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26816463
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.172442
_version_ 1782410314386505728
author Daniel, M. Jonathan
Pazhani, Ambiga
author_facet Daniel, M. Jonathan
Pazhani, Ambiga
author_sort Daniel, M. Jonathan
collection PubMed
description AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aims and objectives of the study were to compare the accuracy of bite mark analysis from three different food substances-apple, cheese and chocolate using two techniques-the manual docking procedure and computer assisted overlay generation technique and to compare the accuracy of the two techniques for bite mark analysis on food substances. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The individuals who participated in the study were made to bite on three food substances-apple, cheese, and chocolate. Dentate individuals were included in the study. Edentulous individuals and individuals having a missing anterior tooth were excluded from the study. The dental casts of the individual were applied to the positive cast of the bitten food substance to determine docking or matching. Then, computer generated overlays were compared with bite mark pattern on the foodstuff. RESULTS: The results were tabulated and the comparison of bite mark analysis on the three different food substances was analyzed by Kruskall-Wallis ANOVA test and the comparison of the two techniques was analyzed by Spearman's Rho correlation coefficient. CONCLUSION: On comparing the bite marks analysis from the three food substances-apple, cheese and chocolate, the accuracy was found to be greater for chocolate and cheese than apple.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4714411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47144112016-01-26 Accuracy of bite mark analysis from food substances: A comparative study Daniel, M. Jonathan Pazhani, Ambiga J Forensic Dent Sci Original Article AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aims and objectives of the study were to compare the accuracy of bite mark analysis from three different food substances-apple, cheese and chocolate using two techniques-the manual docking procedure and computer assisted overlay generation technique and to compare the accuracy of the two techniques for bite mark analysis on food substances. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The individuals who participated in the study were made to bite on three food substances-apple, cheese, and chocolate. Dentate individuals were included in the study. Edentulous individuals and individuals having a missing anterior tooth were excluded from the study. The dental casts of the individual were applied to the positive cast of the bitten food substance to determine docking or matching. Then, computer generated overlays were compared with bite mark pattern on the foodstuff. RESULTS: The results were tabulated and the comparison of bite mark analysis on the three different food substances was analyzed by Kruskall-Wallis ANOVA test and the comparison of the two techniques was analyzed by Spearman's Rho correlation coefficient. CONCLUSION: On comparing the bite marks analysis from the three food substances-apple, cheese and chocolate, the accuracy was found to be greater for chocolate and cheese than apple. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4714411/ /pubmed/26816463 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.172442 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Daniel, M. Jonathan
Pazhani, Ambiga
Accuracy of bite mark analysis from food substances: A comparative study
title Accuracy of bite mark analysis from food substances: A comparative study
title_full Accuracy of bite mark analysis from food substances: A comparative study
title_fullStr Accuracy of bite mark analysis from food substances: A comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of bite mark analysis from food substances: A comparative study
title_short Accuracy of bite mark analysis from food substances: A comparative study
title_sort accuracy of bite mark analysis from food substances: a comparative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4714411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26816463
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.172442
work_keys_str_mv AT danielmjonathan accuracyofbitemarkanalysisfromfoodsubstancesacomparativestudy
AT pazhaniambiga accuracyofbitemarkanalysisfromfoodsubstancesacomparativestudy