Cargando…

Lessons learnt from the Bristol Girls Dance Project cluster RCT: implications for designing and implementing after-school physical activity interventions

OBJECTIVE: To consider implementation issues associated with the delivery of Bristol Girls Dance Project (BGDP) and to identify improvements that may aid the design of after-school physical activity (PA) interventions. DESIGN: Two-armed cluster randomised control trial. The BGDP was a 20-week school...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edwards, Mark J, May, Thomas, Kesten, Joanna M, Banfield, Kate, Bird, Emma L, Powell, Jane E, Sebire, Simon J, Jago, Russell
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4716230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26747038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010036
_version_ 1782410527656378368
author Edwards, Mark J
May, Thomas
Kesten, Joanna M
Banfield, Kate
Bird, Emma L
Powell, Jane E
Sebire, Simon J
Jago, Russell
author_facet Edwards, Mark J
May, Thomas
Kesten, Joanna M
Banfield, Kate
Bird, Emma L
Powell, Jane E
Sebire, Simon J
Jago, Russell
author_sort Edwards, Mark J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To consider implementation issues associated with the delivery of Bristol Girls Dance Project (BGDP) and to identify improvements that may aid the design of after-school physical activity (PA) interventions. DESIGN: Two-armed cluster randomised control trial. The BGDP was a 20-week school-based intervention, consisting of two 75 min after-school dance sessions per week, which aimed to support Year 7 girls to be more physically active. SETTING: 18 secondary schools (nine intervention, nine control) in the Greater Bristol area (as an indication of deprivation, children eligible for the pupil premium in participant schools ranged from 6.9 to 53.3%). PARTICIPANTS: 571 Year 7 girls. This article reports on qualitative data collected from 59 girls in the intervention arm of the trial, 10 dance instructors and 9 school contacts involved in the delivering of the BGDP. METHODS: Data were obtained from nine focus groups with girls (one per intervention school), and interviews with dance instructors and school contacts. Focus groups sought views of girls’ motivation to participate, teaching styles and experiences of the intervention. Interviews explored views on implementation and dissemination. Framework analysis was used to analyse data. RESULTS: Qualitative data elicited three themes associated with the delivery of BGDP that affected implementation: project design, session content and project organisation. ‘Project design’ found issues associated with recruitment, timetabling and session quantity to influence the effectiveness of BGDP. ‘Session content’ found that dance instructors delivered a range of content and that girls enjoyed a variety of dance. Themes within ‘project organisation’ suggested an ‘open enrolment’ policy and greater parental involvement may facilitate better attendance. CONCLUSIONS: After-school PA interventions have potential for increasing PA levels among adolescent girls. There is a need to consider the context in which interventions are delivered and implement them in ways that are appropriate to the needs of participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN52882523.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4716230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47162302016-01-31 Lessons learnt from the Bristol Girls Dance Project cluster RCT: implications for designing and implementing after-school physical activity interventions Edwards, Mark J May, Thomas Kesten, Joanna M Banfield, Kate Bird, Emma L Powell, Jane E Sebire, Simon J Jago, Russell BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: To consider implementation issues associated with the delivery of Bristol Girls Dance Project (BGDP) and to identify improvements that may aid the design of after-school physical activity (PA) interventions. DESIGN: Two-armed cluster randomised control trial. The BGDP was a 20-week school-based intervention, consisting of two 75 min after-school dance sessions per week, which aimed to support Year 7 girls to be more physically active. SETTING: 18 secondary schools (nine intervention, nine control) in the Greater Bristol area (as an indication of deprivation, children eligible for the pupil premium in participant schools ranged from 6.9 to 53.3%). PARTICIPANTS: 571 Year 7 girls. This article reports on qualitative data collected from 59 girls in the intervention arm of the trial, 10 dance instructors and 9 school contacts involved in the delivering of the BGDP. METHODS: Data were obtained from nine focus groups with girls (one per intervention school), and interviews with dance instructors and school contacts. Focus groups sought views of girls’ motivation to participate, teaching styles and experiences of the intervention. Interviews explored views on implementation and dissemination. Framework analysis was used to analyse data. RESULTS: Qualitative data elicited three themes associated with the delivery of BGDP that affected implementation: project design, session content and project organisation. ‘Project design’ found issues associated with recruitment, timetabling and session quantity to influence the effectiveness of BGDP. ‘Session content’ found that dance instructors delivered a range of content and that girls enjoyed a variety of dance. Themes within ‘project organisation’ suggested an ‘open enrolment’ policy and greater parental involvement may facilitate better attendance. CONCLUSIONS: After-school PA interventions have potential for increasing PA levels among adolescent girls. There is a need to consider the context in which interventions are delivered and implement them in ways that are appropriate to the needs of participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN52882523. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4716230/ /pubmed/26747038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010036 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Public Health
Edwards, Mark J
May, Thomas
Kesten, Joanna M
Banfield, Kate
Bird, Emma L
Powell, Jane E
Sebire, Simon J
Jago, Russell
Lessons learnt from the Bristol Girls Dance Project cluster RCT: implications for designing and implementing after-school physical activity interventions
title Lessons learnt from the Bristol Girls Dance Project cluster RCT: implications for designing and implementing after-school physical activity interventions
title_full Lessons learnt from the Bristol Girls Dance Project cluster RCT: implications for designing and implementing after-school physical activity interventions
title_fullStr Lessons learnt from the Bristol Girls Dance Project cluster RCT: implications for designing and implementing after-school physical activity interventions
title_full_unstemmed Lessons learnt from the Bristol Girls Dance Project cluster RCT: implications for designing and implementing after-school physical activity interventions
title_short Lessons learnt from the Bristol Girls Dance Project cluster RCT: implications for designing and implementing after-school physical activity interventions
title_sort lessons learnt from the bristol girls dance project cluster rct: implications for designing and implementing after-school physical activity interventions
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4716230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26747038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010036
work_keys_str_mv AT edwardsmarkj lessonslearntfromthebristolgirlsdanceprojectclusterrctimplicationsfordesigningandimplementingafterschoolphysicalactivityinterventions
AT maythomas lessonslearntfromthebristolgirlsdanceprojectclusterrctimplicationsfordesigningandimplementingafterschoolphysicalactivityinterventions
AT kestenjoannam lessonslearntfromthebristolgirlsdanceprojectclusterrctimplicationsfordesigningandimplementingafterschoolphysicalactivityinterventions
AT banfieldkate lessonslearntfromthebristolgirlsdanceprojectclusterrctimplicationsfordesigningandimplementingafterschoolphysicalactivityinterventions
AT birdemmal lessonslearntfromthebristolgirlsdanceprojectclusterrctimplicationsfordesigningandimplementingafterschoolphysicalactivityinterventions
AT powelljanee lessonslearntfromthebristolgirlsdanceprojectclusterrctimplicationsfordesigningandimplementingafterschoolphysicalactivityinterventions
AT sebiresimonj lessonslearntfromthebristolgirlsdanceprojectclusterrctimplicationsfordesigningandimplementingafterschoolphysicalactivityinterventions
AT jagorussell lessonslearntfromthebristolgirlsdanceprojectclusterrctimplicationsfordesigningandimplementingafterschoolphysicalactivityinterventions