Cargando…
Comparisons of biophysical properties and bioactivities of mono-PEGylated endostatin and an endostatin analog
BACKGROUND: Endostatin (ES) is a well-established potent endogenous antiangiogenic factor. An ES variant, called zinc-binding protein-ES (ZBP-ES), is clinically available; however, its use is limited by rapid renal clearance and short residence time. PEGylation has been exploited to overcome these s...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4721152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26792627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40880-016-0080-8 |
_version_ | 1782411186250186752 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Shan Fu, Yan Luo, Yongzhang |
author_facet | Wang, Shan Fu, Yan Luo, Yongzhang |
author_sort | Wang, Shan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Endostatin (ES) is a well-established potent endogenous antiangiogenic factor. An ES variant, called zinc-binding protein-ES (ZBP-ES), is clinically available; however, its use is limited by rapid renal clearance and short residence time. PEGylation has been exploited to overcome these shortcomings, and mono-PEGylated ES (called M(2)ES) as well as mono-PEGylated ZBP-ES (MZBP-ES) are developed in our study. This study aimed to compare the biophysical properties and biological effects of M(2)ES and MZBP-ES to evaluate their druggability. METHODS: Circular dichroism and tryptophan emission fluorescence were used to monitor the conformational changes of M(2)ES and MZBP-ES. Their resistance to trypsin digestion and guanidinium chloride (GdmCl)-induced unfolding was examined by Coomassie staining and tryptophan emission fluorescence, respectively. The biological effects of M(2)ES and MZBP-ES on endothelial cell migration were evaluated using Transwell migration and wound healing assays, and the uptake of M(2)ES and MZBP-ES in endothelial cells was also compared by Western blotting and immunofluorescence. RESULTS: Structural analyses revealed that M(2)ES has a more compact tertiary structure than MZBP-ES. Moreover, M(2)ES was more resistant to trypsin digestion and GdmCl-induced unfolding compared with MZBP-ES. In addition, although M(2)ES and MZBP-ES showed comparable levels of inhibiting transwell migration and wound healing of endothelial cells, M(2)ES displayed an increased ability to enter cells compared with MZBP-ES, possibly caused by the enhanced interaction with nucleolin. CONCLUSIONS: M(2)ES has a more compact tertiary structure, is more stable for trypsin digestion and GdmCl-induced unfolding, exhibits increased cellular uptake and shows equivalent inhibitory effects on cell migration relative to MZBP-ES, indicating that M(2)ES is a more promising candidate for anticancer drug development compared with MZBP-ES. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4721152 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47211522016-01-21 Comparisons of biophysical properties and bioactivities of mono-PEGylated endostatin and an endostatin analog Wang, Shan Fu, Yan Luo, Yongzhang Chin J Cancer Original Article BACKGROUND: Endostatin (ES) is a well-established potent endogenous antiangiogenic factor. An ES variant, called zinc-binding protein-ES (ZBP-ES), is clinically available; however, its use is limited by rapid renal clearance and short residence time. PEGylation has been exploited to overcome these shortcomings, and mono-PEGylated ES (called M(2)ES) as well as mono-PEGylated ZBP-ES (MZBP-ES) are developed in our study. This study aimed to compare the biophysical properties and biological effects of M(2)ES and MZBP-ES to evaluate their druggability. METHODS: Circular dichroism and tryptophan emission fluorescence were used to monitor the conformational changes of M(2)ES and MZBP-ES. Their resistance to trypsin digestion and guanidinium chloride (GdmCl)-induced unfolding was examined by Coomassie staining and tryptophan emission fluorescence, respectively. The biological effects of M(2)ES and MZBP-ES on endothelial cell migration were evaluated using Transwell migration and wound healing assays, and the uptake of M(2)ES and MZBP-ES in endothelial cells was also compared by Western blotting and immunofluorescence. RESULTS: Structural analyses revealed that M(2)ES has a more compact tertiary structure than MZBP-ES. Moreover, M(2)ES was more resistant to trypsin digestion and GdmCl-induced unfolding compared with MZBP-ES. In addition, although M(2)ES and MZBP-ES showed comparable levels of inhibiting transwell migration and wound healing of endothelial cells, M(2)ES displayed an increased ability to enter cells compared with MZBP-ES, possibly caused by the enhanced interaction with nucleolin. CONCLUSIONS: M(2)ES has a more compact tertiary structure, is more stable for trypsin digestion and GdmCl-induced unfolding, exhibits increased cellular uptake and shows equivalent inhibitory effects on cell migration relative to MZBP-ES, indicating that M(2)ES is a more promising candidate for anticancer drug development compared with MZBP-ES. BioMed Central 2016-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4721152/ /pubmed/26792627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40880-016-0080-8 Text en © Wang et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wang, Shan Fu, Yan Luo, Yongzhang Comparisons of biophysical properties and bioactivities of mono-PEGylated endostatin and an endostatin analog |
title | Comparisons of biophysical properties and bioactivities of mono-PEGylated endostatin and an endostatin analog |
title_full | Comparisons of biophysical properties and bioactivities of mono-PEGylated endostatin and an endostatin analog |
title_fullStr | Comparisons of biophysical properties and bioactivities of mono-PEGylated endostatin and an endostatin analog |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparisons of biophysical properties and bioactivities of mono-PEGylated endostatin and an endostatin analog |
title_short | Comparisons of biophysical properties and bioactivities of mono-PEGylated endostatin and an endostatin analog |
title_sort | comparisons of biophysical properties and bioactivities of mono-pegylated endostatin and an endostatin analog |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4721152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26792627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40880-016-0080-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangshan comparisonsofbiophysicalpropertiesandbioactivitiesofmonopegylatedendostatinandanendostatinanalog AT fuyan comparisonsofbiophysicalpropertiesandbioactivitiesofmonopegylatedendostatinandanendostatinanalog AT luoyongzhang comparisonsofbiophysicalpropertiesandbioactivitiesofmonopegylatedendostatinandanendostatinanalog |