Cargando…

Flexibility and small pockets at protein–protein interfaces: New insights into druggability

The transient assembly of multiprotein complexes mediates many aspects of cell regulation and signalling in living organisms. Modulation of the formation of these complexes through targeting protein–protein interfaces can offer greater selectivity than the inhibition of protein kinases, proteases or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jubb, Harry, Blundell, Tom L., Ascher, David B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pergamon Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4726663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25662442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2015.01.009
_version_ 1782411866932248576
author Jubb, Harry
Blundell, Tom L.
Ascher, David B.
author_facet Jubb, Harry
Blundell, Tom L.
Ascher, David B.
author_sort Jubb, Harry
collection PubMed
description The transient assembly of multiprotein complexes mediates many aspects of cell regulation and signalling in living organisms. Modulation of the formation of these complexes through targeting protein–protein interfaces can offer greater selectivity than the inhibition of protein kinases, proteases or other post-translational regulatory enzymes using substrate, co-factor or transition state mimetics. However, capitalising on protein–protein interaction interfaces as drug targets has been hindered by the nature of interfaces that tend to offer binding sites lacking the well-defined large cavities of classical drug targets. In this review we posit that interfaces formed by concerted folding and binding (disorder-to-order transitions on binding) of one partner and other examples of interfaces where a protein partner is bound through a continuous epitope from a surface-exposed helix, flexible loop or chain extension may be more tractable for the development of “orthosteric”, competitive chemical modulators; these interfaces tend to offer small-volume but deep pockets and/or larger grooves that may be bound tightly by small chemical entities. We discuss examples of such protein–protein interaction interfaces for which successful chemical modulators are being developed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4726663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Pergamon Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47266632016-02-22 Flexibility and small pockets at protein–protein interfaces: New insights into druggability Jubb, Harry Blundell, Tom L. Ascher, David B. Prog Biophys Mol Biol Review The transient assembly of multiprotein complexes mediates many aspects of cell regulation and signalling in living organisms. Modulation of the formation of these complexes through targeting protein–protein interfaces can offer greater selectivity than the inhibition of protein kinases, proteases or other post-translational regulatory enzymes using substrate, co-factor or transition state mimetics. However, capitalising on protein–protein interaction interfaces as drug targets has been hindered by the nature of interfaces that tend to offer binding sites lacking the well-defined large cavities of classical drug targets. In this review we posit that interfaces formed by concerted folding and binding (disorder-to-order transitions on binding) of one partner and other examples of interfaces where a protein partner is bound through a continuous epitope from a surface-exposed helix, flexible loop or chain extension may be more tractable for the development of “orthosteric”, competitive chemical modulators; these interfaces tend to offer small-volume but deep pockets and/or larger grooves that may be bound tightly by small chemical entities. We discuss examples of such protein–protein interaction interfaces for which successful chemical modulators are being developed. Pergamon Press 2015-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4726663/ /pubmed/25662442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2015.01.009 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Jubb, Harry
Blundell, Tom L.
Ascher, David B.
Flexibility and small pockets at protein–protein interfaces: New insights into druggability
title Flexibility and small pockets at protein–protein interfaces: New insights into druggability
title_full Flexibility and small pockets at protein–protein interfaces: New insights into druggability
title_fullStr Flexibility and small pockets at protein–protein interfaces: New insights into druggability
title_full_unstemmed Flexibility and small pockets at protein–protein interfaces: New insights into druggability
title_short Flexibility and small pockets at protein–protein interfaces: New insights into druggability
title_sort flexibility and small pockets at protein–protein interfaces: new insights into druggability
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4726663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25662442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2015.01.009
work_keys_str_mv AT jubbharry flexibilityandsmallpocketsatproteinproteininterfacesnewinsightsintodruggability
AT blundelltoml flexibilityandsmallpocketsatproteinproteininterfacesnewinsightsintodruggability
AT ascherdavidb flexibilityandsmallpocketsatproteinproteininterfacesnewinsightsintodruggability