Cargando…

DNA-binding sequence specificity of DUX4

BACKGROUND: Misexpression of the double homeodomain transcription factor DUX4 results in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). A DNA-binding consensus with two tandem TAAT motifs based on chromatin IP peaks has been discovered; however, the consensus has multiple variations (flavors) of unk...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yu, Lee, John K., Toso, Erik A., Lee, Joslynn S., Choi, Si Ho, Slattery, Matthew, Aihara, Hideki, Kyba, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4730607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26823969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13395-016-0080-z
_version_ 1782412429144096768
author Zhang, Yu
Lee, John K.
Toso, Erik A.
Lee, Joslynn S.
Choi, Si Ho
Slattery, Matthew
Aihara, Hideki
Kyba, Michael
author_facet Zhang, Yu
Lee, John K.
Toso, Erik A.
Lee, Joslynn S.
Choi, Si Ho
Slattery, Matthew
Aihara, Hideki
Kyba, Michael
author_sort Zhang, Yu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Misexpression of the double homeodomain transcription factor DUX4 results in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). A DNA-binding consensus with two tandem TAAT motifs based on chromatin IP peaks has been discovered; however, the consensus has multiple variations (flavors) of unknown relative activity. In addition, not all peaks have this consensus, and the Pitx1 promoter, the first DUX4 target sequence mooted, has a different TAAT-rich sequence. Furthermore, it is not known whether and to what extent deviations from the consensus affect DNA-binding affinity and transcriptional activation potential. RESULTS: Here, we take both unbiased and consensus sequence-driven approaches to determine the DNA-binding specificity of DUX4 and its tolerance to mismatches at each site within its consensus sequence. We discover that the best binding and the greatest transcriptional activation are observed when the two TAAT motifs are separated by a C residue. The second TAAT motif in the consensus sequence is actually (T/C)AAT. We find that a T is preferred here. DUX4 has no transcriptional activity on “half-sites”, i.e., those bearing only a single TAAT motif. We further find that DUX4 does not bind to the TAATTA motif in the Pitx1 promoter, that Pitx1 sequences have no competitive band shift activity, and that the Pitx1 sequence is transcriptionally inactive, calling into question PITX1 as a DUX4 target gene. Finally, by multimerizing binding sites, we find that DUX4 transcriptional activation demonstrates tremendous synergy and that at low DNA concentrations, at least two motifs are necessary to detect a transcriptional response. CONCLUSIONS: These studies illuminate the DNA-binding sequence preferences of DUX4. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13395-016-0080-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4730607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47306072016-01-29 DNA-binding sequence specificity of DUX4 Zhang, Yu Lee, John K. Toso, Erik A. Lee, Joslynn S. Choi, Si Ho Slattery, Matthew Aihara, Hideki Kyba, Michael Skelet Muscle Research BACKGROUND: Misexpression of the double homeodomain transcription factor DUX4 results in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). A DNA-binding consensus with two tandem TAAT motifs based on chromatin IP peaks has been discovered; however, the consensus has multiple variations (flavors) of unknown relative activity. In addition, not all peaks have this consensus, and the Pitx1 promoter, the first DUX4 target sequence mooted, has a different TAAT-rich sequence. Furthermore, it is not known whether and to what extent deviations from the consensus affect DNA-binding affinity and transcriptional activation potential. RESULTS: Here, we take both unbiased and consensus sequence-driven approaches to determine the DNA-binding specificity of DUX4 and its tolerance to mismatches at each site within its consensus sequence. We discover that the best binding and the greatest transcriptional activation are observed when the two TAAT motifs are separated by a C residue. The second TAAT motif in the consensus sequence is actually (T/C)AAT. We find that a T is preferred here. DUX4 has no transcriptional activity on “half-sites”, i.e., those bearing only a single TAAT motif. We further find that DUX4 does not bind to the TAATTA motif in the Pitx1 promoter, that Pitx1 sequences have no competitive band shift activity, and that the Pitx1 sequence is transcriptionally inactive, calling into question PITX1 as a DUX4 target gene. Finally, by multimerizing binding sites, we find that DUX4 transcriptional activation demonstrates tremendous synergy and that at low DNA concentrations, at least two motifs are necessary to detect a transcriptional response. CONCLUSIONS: These studies illuminate the DNA-binding sequence preferences of DUX4. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13395-016-0080-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4730607/ /pubmed/26823969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13395-016-0080-z Text en © Zhang et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Zhang, Yu
Lee, John K.
Toso, Erik A.
Lee, Joslynn S.
Choi, Si Ho
Slattery, Matthew
Aihara, Hideki
Kyba, Michael
DNA-binding sequence specificity of DUX4
title DNA-binding sequence specificity of DUX4
title_full DNA-binding sequence specificity of DUX4
title_fullStr DNA-binding sequence specificity of DUX4
title_full_unstemmed DNA-binding sequence specificity of DUX4
title_short DNA-binding sequence specificity of DUX4
title_sort dna-binding sequence specificity of dux4
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4730607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26823969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13395-016-0080-z
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyu dnabindingsequencespecificityofdux4
AT leejohnk dnabindingsequencespecificityofdux4
AT tosoerika dnabindingsequencespecificityofdux4
AT leejoslynns dnabindingsequencespecificityofdux4
AT choisiho dnabindingsequencespecificityofdux4
AT slatterymatthew dnabindingsequencespecificityofdux4
AT aiharahideki dnabindingsequencespecificityofdux4
AT kybamichael dnabindingsequencespecificityofdux4