Cargando…
DNA-binding sequence specificity of DUX4
BACKGROUND: Misexpression of the double homeodomain transcription factor DUX4 results in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). A DNA-binding consensus with two tandem TAAT motifs based on chromatin IP peaks has been discovered; however, the consensus has multiple variations (flavors) of unk...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4730607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26823969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13395-016-0080-z |
_version_ | 1782412429144096768 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yu Lee, John K. Toso, Erik A. Lee, Joslynn S. Choi, Si Ho Slattery, Matthew Aihara, Hideki Kyba, Michael |
author_facet | Zhang, Yu Lee, John K. Toso, Erik A. Lee, Joslynn S. Choi, Si Ho Slattery, Matthew Aihara, Hideki Kyba, Michael |
author_sort | Zhang, Yu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Misexpression of the double homeodomain transcription factor DUX4 results in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). A DNA-binding consensus with two tandem TAAT motifs based on chromatin IP peaks has been discovered; however, the consensus has multiple variations (flavors) of unknown relative activity. In addition, not all peaks have this consensus, and the Pitx1 promoter, the first DUX4 target sequence mooted, has a different TAAT-rich sequence. Furthermore, it is not known whether and to what extent deviations from the consensus affect DNA-binding affinity and transcriptional activation potential. RESULTS: Here, we take both unbiased and consensus sequence-driven approaches to determine the DNA-binding specificity of DUX4 and its tolerance to mismatches at each site within its consensus sequence. We discover that the best binding and the greatest transcriptional activation are observed when the two TAAT motifs are separated by a C residue. The second TAAT motif in the consensus sequence is actually (T/C)AAT. We find that a T is preferred here. DUX4 has no transcriptional activity on “half-sites”, i.e., those bearing only a single TAAT motif. We further find that DUX4 does not bind to the TAATTA motif in the Pitx1 promoter, that Pitx1 sequences have no competitive band shift activity, and that the Pitx1 sequence is transcriptionally inactive, calling into question PITX1 as a DUX4 target gene. Finally, by multimerizing binding sites, we find that DUX4 transcriptional activation demonstrates tremendous synergy and that at low DNA concentrations, at least two motifs are necessary to detect a transcriptional response. CONCLUSIONS: These studies illuminate the DNA-binding sequence preferences of DUX4. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13395-016-0080-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4730607 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47306072016-01-29 DNA-binding sequence specificity of DUX4 Zhang, Yu Lee, John K. Toso, Erik A. Lee, Joslynn S. Choi, Si Ho Slattery, Matthew Aihara, Hideki Kyba, Michael Skelet Muscle Research BACKGROUND: Misexpression of the double homeodomain transcription factor DUX4 results in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). A DNA-binding consensus with two tandem TAAT motifs based on chromatin IP peaks has been discovered; however, the consensus has multiple variations (flavors) of unknown relative activity. In addition, not all peaks have this consensus, and the Pitx1 promoter, the first DUX4 target sequence mooted, has a different TAAT-rich sequence. Furthermore, it is not known whether and to what extent deviations from the consensus affect DNA-binding affinity and transcriptional activation potential. RESULTS: Here, we take both unbiased and consensus sequence-driven approaches to determine the DNA-binding specificity of DUX4 and its tolerance to mismatches at each site within its consensus sequence. We discover that the best binding and the greatest transcriptional activation are observed when the two TAAT motifs are separated by a C residue. The second TAAT motif in the consensus sequence is actually (T/C)AAT. We find that a T is preferred here. DUX4 has no transcriptional activity on “half-sites”, i.e., those bearing only a single TAAT motif. We further find that DUX4 does not bind to the TAATTA motif in the Pitx1 promoter, that Pitx1 sequences have no competitive band shift activity, and that the Pitx1 sequence is transcriptionally inactive, calling into question PITX1 as a DUX4 target gene. Finally, by multimerizing binding sites, we find that DUX4 transcriptional activation demonstrates tremendous synergy and that at low DNA concentrations, at least two motifs are necessary to detect a transcriptional response. CONCLUSIONS: These studies illuminate the DNA-binding sequence preferences of DUX4. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13395-016-0080-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4730607/ /pubmed/26823969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13395-016-0080-z Text en © Zhang et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Zhang, Yu Lee, John K. Toso, Erik A. Lee, Joslynn S. Choi, Si Ho Slattery, Matthew Aihara, Hideki Kyba, Michael DNA-binding sequence specificity of DUX4 |
title | DNA-binding sequence specificity of DUX4 |
title_full | DNA-binding sequence specificity of DUX4 |
title_fullStr | DNA-binding sequence specificity of DUX4 |
title_full_unstemmed | DNA-binding sequence specificity of DUX4 |
title_short | DNA-binding sequence specificity of DUX4 |
title_sort | dna-binding sequence specificity of dux4 |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4730607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26823969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13395-016-0080-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyu dnabindingsequencespecificityofdux4 AT leejohnk dnabindingsequencespecificityofdux4 AT tosoerika dnabindingsequencespecificityofdux4 AT leejoslynns dnabindingsequencespecificityofdux4 AT choisiho dnabindingsequencespecificityofdux4 AT slatterymatthew dnabindingsequencespecificityofdux4 AT aiharahideki dnabindingsequencespecificityofdux4 AT kybamichael dnabindingsequencespecificityofdux4 |