Cargando…
Probing binding hot spots at protein–RNA recognition sites
We use evolutionary conservation derived from structure alignment of polypeptide sequences along with structural and physicochemical attributes of protein–RNA interfaces to probe the binding hot spots at protein–RNA recognition sites. We find that the degree of conservation varies across the RNA bin...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4737170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26365245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv876 |
_version_ | 1782413432204558336 |
---|---|
author | Barik, Amita Nithin, Chandran Karampudi, Naga Bhushana Rao Mukherjee, Sunandan Bahadur, Ranjit Prasad |
author_facet | Barik, Amita Nithin, Chandran Karampudi, Naga Bhushana Rao Mukherjee, Sunandan Bahadur, Ranjit Prasad |
author_sort | Barik, Amita |
collection | PubMed |
description | We use evolutionary conservation derived from structure alignment of polypeptide sequences along with structural and physicochemical attributes of protein–RNA interfaces to probe the binding hot spots at protein–RNA recognition sites. We find that the degree of conservation varies across the RNA binding proteins; some evolve rapidly compared to others. Additionally, irrespective of the structural class of the complexes, residues at the RNA binding sites are evolutionary better conserved than those at the solvent exposed surfaces. For recognitions involving duplex RNA, residues interacting with the major groove are better conserved than those interacting with the minor groove. We identify multi-interface residues participating simultaneously in protein–protein and protein–RNA interfaces in complexes where more than one polypeptide is involved in RNA recognition, and show that they are better conserved compared to any other RNA binding residues. We find that the residues at water preservation site are better conserved than those at hydrated or at dehydrated sites. Finally, we develop a Random Forests model using structural and physicochemical attributes for predicting binding hot spots. The model accurately predicts 80% of the instances of experimental ΔΔG values in a particular class, and provides a stepping-stone towards the engineering of protein–RNA recognition sites with desired affinity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4737170 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47371702016-02-03 Probing binding hot spots at protein–RNA recognition sites Barik, Amita Nithin, Chandran Karampudi, Naga Bhushana Rao Mukherjee, Sunandan Bahadur, Ranjit Prasad Nucleic Acids Res Methods Online We use evolutionary conservation derived from structure alignment of polypeptide sequences along with structural and physicochemical attributes of protein–RNA interfaces to probe the binding hot spots at protein–RNA recognition sites. We find that the degree of conservation varies across the RNA binding proteins; some evolve rapidly compared to others. Additionally, irrespective of the structural class of the complexes, residues at the RNA binding sites are evolutionary better conserved than those at the solvent exposed surfaces. For recognitions involving duplex RNA, residues interacting with the major groove are better conserved than those interacting with the minor groove. We identify multi-interface residues participating simultaneously in protein–protein and protein–RNA interfaces in complexes where more than one polypeptide is involved in RNA recognition, and show that they are better conserved compared to any other RNA binding residues. We find that the residues at water preservation site are better conserved than those at hydrated or at dehydrated sites. Finally, we develop a Random Forests model using structural and physicochemical attributes for predicting binding hot spots. The model accurately predicts 80% of the instances of experimental ΔΔG values in a particular class, and provides a stepping-stone towards the engineering of protein–RNA recognition sites with desired affinity. Oxford University Press 2016-01-29 2015-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4737170/ /pubmed/26365245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv876 Text en © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methods Online Barik, Amita Nithin, Chandran Karampudi, Naga Bhushana Rao Mukherjee, Sunandan Bahadur, Ranjit Prasad Probing binding hot spots at protein–RNA recognition sites |
title | Probing binding hot spots at protein–RNA recognition sites |
title_full | Probing binding hot spots at protein–RNA recognition sites |
title_fullStr | Probing binding hot spots at protein–RNA recognition sites |
title_full_unstemmed | Probing binding hot spots at protein–RNA recognition sites |
title_short | Probing binding hot spots at protein–RNA recognition sites |
title_sort | probing binding hot spots at protein–rna recognition sites |
topic | Methods Online |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4737170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26365245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv876 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barikamita probingbindinghotspotsatproteinrnarecognitionsites AT nithinchandran probingbindinghotspotsatproteinrnarecognitionsites AT karampudinagabhushanarao probingbindinghotspotsatproteinrnarecognitionsites AT mukherjeesunandan probingbindinghotspotsatproteinrnarecognitionsites AT bahadurranjitprasad probingbindinghotspotsatproteinrnarecognitionsites |