Cargando…

How much flower‐rich habitat is enough for wild pollinators? Answering a key policy question with incomplete knowledge

In 2013, an opportunity arose in England to develop an agri‐environment package for wild pollinators, as part of the new Countryside Stewardship scheme launched in 2015. It can be understood as a ‘policy window’, a rare and time‐limited opportunity to change policy, supported by a narrative about po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: DICKS, LYNN V., BAUDE, MATHILDE, ROBERTS, STUART P. M., PHILLIPS, JAMES, GREEN, MIKE, CARVELL, CLAIRE
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4737402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26877581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/een.12226
_version_ 1782413476823564288
author DICKS, LYNN V.
BAUDE, MATHILDE
ROBERTS, STUART P. M.
PHILLIPS, JAMES
GREEN, MIKE
CARVELL, CLAIRE
author_facet DICKS, LYNN V.
BAUDE, MATHILDE
ROBERTS, STUART P. M.
PHILLIPS, JAMES
GREEN, MIKE
CARVELL, CLAIRE
author_sort DICKS, LYNN V.
collection PubMed
description In 2013, an opportunity arose in England to develop an agri‐environment package for wild pollinators, as part of the new Countryside Stewardship scheme launched in 2015. It can be understood as a ‘policy window’, a rare and time‐limited opportunity to change policy, supported by a narrative about pollinator decline and widely supported mitigating actions. An agri‐environment package is a bundle of management options that together supply sufficient resources to support a target group of species. This paper documents information that was available at the time to develop such a package for wild pollinators. Four questions needed answering: (1) Which pollinator species should be targeted? (2) Which resources limit these species in farmland? (3) Which management options provide these resources? (4) What area of each option is needed to support populations of the target species? Focussing on wild bees, we provide tentative answers that were used to inform development of the package. There is strong evidence that floral resources can limit wild bee populations, and several sources of evidence identify a set of agri‐environment options that provide flowers and other resources for pollinators. The final question could only be answered for floral resources, with a wide range of uncertainty. We show that the areas of some floral resource options in the basic Wild Pollinator and Farmland Wildlife Package (2% flower‐rich habitat and 1 km flowering hedgerow), are sufficient to supply a set of six common pollinator species with enough pollen to feed their larvae at lowest estimates, using minimum values for estimated parameters where a range was available. We identify key sources of uncertainty, and stress the importance of keeping the Package flexible, so it can be revised as new evidence emerges about how to achieve the policy aim of supporting pollinators on farmland.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4737402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47374022016-02-12 How much flower‐rich habitat is enough for wild pollinators? Answering a key policy question with incomplete knowledge DICKS, LYNN V. BAUDE, MATHILDE ROBERTS, STUART P. M. PHILLIPS, JAMES GREEN, MIKE CARVELL, CLAIRE Ecol Entomol Insects and Ecosystem Services, 28th Symposium of the Royal Entomological Society of London In 2013, an opportunity arose in England to develop an agri‐environment package for wild pollinators, as part of the new Countryside Stewardship scheme launched in 2015. It can be understood as a ‘policy window’, a rare and time‐limited opportunity to change policy, supported by a narrative about pollinator decline and widely supported mitigating actions. An agri‐environment package is a bundle of management options that together supply sufficient resources to support a target group of species. This paper documents information that was available at the time to develop such a package for wild pollinators. Four questions needed answering: (1) Which pollinator species should be targeted? (2) Which resources limit these species in farmland? (3) Which management options provide these resources? (4) What area of each option is needed to support populations of the target species? Focussing on wild bees, we provide tentative answers that were used to inform development of the package. There is strong evidence that floral resources can limit wild bee populations, and several sources of evidence identify a set of agri‐environment options that provide flowers and other resources for pollinators. The final question could only be answered for floral resources, with a wide range of uncertainty. We show that the areas of some floral resource options in the basic Wild Pollinator and Farmland Wildlife Package (2% flower‐rich habitat and 1 km flowering hedgerow), are sufficient to supply a set of six common pollinator species with enough pollen to feed their larvae at lowest estimates, using minimum values for estimated parameters where a range was available. We identify key sources of uncertainty, and stress the importance of keeping the Package flexible, so it can be revised as new evidence emerges about how to achieve the policy aim of supporting pollinators on farmland. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2015-07-02 2015-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4737402/ /pubmed/26877581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/een.12226 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Ecological Entomology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Entomological Society This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Insects and Ecosystem Services, 28th Symposium of the Royal Entomological Society of London
DICKS, LYNN V.
BAUDE, MATHILDE
ROBERTS, STUART P. M.
PHILLIPS, JAMES
GREEN, MIKE
CARVELL, CLAIRE
How much flower‐rich habitat is enough for wild pollinators? Answering a key policy question with incomplete knowledge
title How much flower‐rich habitat is enough for wild pollinators? Answering a key policy question with incomplete knowledge
title_full How much flower‐rich habitat is enough for wild pollinators? Answering a key policy question with incomplete knowledge
title_fullStr How much flower‐rich habitat is enough for wild pollinators? Answering a key policy question with incomplete knowledge
title_full_unstemmed How much flower‐rich habitat is enough for wild pollinators? Answering a key policy question with incomplete knowledge
title_short How much flower‐rich habitat is enough for wild pollinators? Answering a key policy question with incomplete knowledge
title_sort how much flower‐rich habitat is enough for wild pollinators? answering a key policy question with incomplete knowledge
topic Insects and Ecosystem Services, 28th Symposium of the Royal Entomological Society of London
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4737402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26877581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/een.12226
work_keys_str_mv AT dickslynnv howmuchflowerrichhabitatisenoughforwildpollinatorsansweringakeypolicyquestionwithincompleteknowledge
AT baudemathilde howmuchflowerrichhabitatisenoughforwildpollinatorsansweringakeypolicyquestionwithincompleteknowledge
AT robertsstuartpm howmuchflowerrichhabitatisenoughforwildpollinatorsansweringakeypolicyquestionwithincompleteknowledge
AT phillipsjames howmuchflowerrichhabitatisenoughforwildpollinatorsansweringakeypolicyquestionwithincompleteknowledge
AT greenmike howmuchflowerrichhabitatisenoughforwildpollinatorsansweringakeypolicyquestionwithincompleteknowledge
AT carvellclaire howmuchflowerrichhabitatisenoughforwildpollinatorsansweringakeypolicyquestionwithincompleteknowledge