Cargando…

Mutation pattern is an influential factor on functional mutation rates in cancer

BACKGROUND: Mutation rates are consistently varied in cancer genome and play an important role in tumorigenesis, however, little has been known about their function potential and impact on the distribution of functional mutations. In this study, we investigated genomic features which affect mutation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Du, Chuance, Wu, Xiaoyuan, Li, Jia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4748466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26865835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-016-0278-5
_version_ 1782415120365780992
author Du, Chuance
Wu, Xiaoyuan
Li, Jia
author_facet Du, Chuance
Wu, Xiaoyuan
Li, Jia
author_sort Du, Chuance
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mutation rates are consistently varied in cancer genome and play an important role in tumorigenesis, however, little has been known about their function potential and impact on the distribution of functional mutations. In this study, we investigated genomic features which affect mutation pattern and the function importance of mutation pattern in cancer. METHODS: Somatic mutations of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma, liver cancer, lung cancer and melanoma and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were intersected with 54 distinct genomic features. Somatic mutation and SNP densities were then computed for each feature type. We constructed 2856 1-Mb windows, in which each row (1-Mb window) contains somatic mutation, SNP densities and 54 feature vectors. Correlation analyses were conducted between somatic mutation, SNP densities and each feature vector. We also built two random forest models, namely somatic mutation model (CSM) and SNP model to predict somatic mutation and SNP densities on a 1-Kb scale. The relation of CSM and SNP scores was further analyzed with the distributions of deleterious coding variants predicted by SIFT and Mutation Assessor, non-coding functional variants evaluated with FunSeq 2 and GWAVA and disease-causing variants from HGMD and ClinVar databases. RESULTS: We observed a wide range of genomic features which affect local mutation rates, such as replication time, transcription levels, histone marks and regulatory elements. Repressive histone marks, replication time and promoter contributed most to the CSM models, while, recombination rate and chromatin organizations were most important for the SNP model. We showed low mutated regions preferentially have higher densities of deleterious coding mutations, higher average scores of non-coding variants, higher fraction of functional regions and higher enrichment of disease-causing variants as compared to high mutated regions. CONCLUSIONS: Somatic mutation densities vary largely across cancer genome, mutation frequency is a major indication of function and influence on the distribution of functional mutations in cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12935-016-0278-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4748466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47484662016-02-11 Mutation pattern is an influential factor on functional mutation rates in cancer Du, Chuance Wu, Xiaoyuan Li, Jia Cancer Cell Int Primary Research BACKGROUND: Mutation rates are consistently varied in cancer genome and play an important role in tumorigenesis, however, little has been known about their function potential and impact on the distribution of functional mutations. In this study, we investigated genomic features which affect mutation pattern and the function importance of mutation pattern in cancer. METHODS: Somatic mutations of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma, liver cancer, lung cancer and melanoma and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were intersected with 54 distinct genomic features. Somatic mutation and SNP densities were then computed for each feature type. We constructed 2856 1-Mb windows, in which each row (1-Mb window) contains somatic mutation, SNP densities and 54 feature vectors. Correlation analyses were conducted between somatic mutation, SNP densities and each feature vector. We also built two random forest models, namely somatic mutation model (CSM) and SNP model to predict somatic mutation and SNP densities on a 1-Kb scale. The relation of CSM and SNP scores was further analyzed with the distributions of deleterious coding variants predicted by SIFT and Mutation Assessor, non-coding functional variants evaluated with FunSeq 2 and GWAVA and disease-causing variants from HGMD and ClinVar databases. RESULTS: We observed a wide range of genomic features which affect local mutation rates, such as replication time, transcription levels, histone marks and regulatory elements. Repressive histone marks, replication time and promoter contributed most to the CSM models, while, recombination rate and chromatin organizations were most important for the SNP model. We showed low mutated regions preferentially have higher densities of deleterious coding mutations, higher average scores of non-coding variants, higher fraction of functional regions and higher enrichment of disease-causing variants as compared to high mutated regions. CONCLUSIONS: Somatic mutation densities vary largely across cancer genome, mutation frequency is a major indication of function and influence on the distribution of functional mutations in cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12935-016-0278-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4748466/ /pubmed/26865835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-016-0278-5 Text en © Du et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Primary Research
Du, Chuance
Wu, Xiaoyuan
Li, Jia
Mutation pattern is an influential factor on functional mutation rates in cancer
title Mutation pattern is an influential factor on functional mutation rates in cancer
title_full Mutation pattern is an influential factor on functional mutation rates in cancer
title_fullStr Mutation pattern is an influential factor on functional mutation rates in cancer
title_full_unstemmed Mutation pattern is an influential factor on functional mutation rates in cancer
title_short Mutation pattern is an influential factor on functional mutation rates in cancer
title_sort mutation pattern is an influential factor on functional mutation rates in cancer
topic Primary Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4748466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26865835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-016-0278-5
work_keys_str_mv AT duchuance mutationpatternisaninfluentialfactoronfunctionalmutationratesincancer
AT wuxiaoyuan mutationpatternisaninfluentialfactoronfunctionalmutationratesincancer
AT lijia mutationpatternisaninfluentialfactoronfunctionalmutationratesincancer