Cargando…
Augmenting the logrank test in the design of clinical trials in which non-proportional hazards of the treatment effect may be anticipated
BACKGROUND: Most randomized controlled trials with a time-to-event outcome are designed assuming proportional hazards (PH) of the treatment effect. The sample size calculation is based on a logrank test. However, non-proportional hazards are increasingly common. At analysis, the estimated hazards ra...
Autores principales: | Royston, Patrick, Parmar, Mahesh K.B. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4751641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26869168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0110-x |
Ejemplares similares
-
Combined test versus logrank/Cox test in 50 randomised trials
por: Royston, Patrick, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
An approach to trial design and analysis in the era of non-proportional hazards of the treatment effect
por: Royston, Patrick, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Survival analysis: coping with non proportional hazards in randomized trials
por: Royston, Patrick, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Restricted mean survival time: an alternative to the hazard ratio for the design and analysis of randomized trials with a time-to-event outcome
por: Royston, Patrick, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Analysis of survival data from trials with non-proportional hazards: an empirical comparison of methods
por: Royston, Patrick, et al.
Publicado: (2013)