Cargando…
The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study
This study aimed to compare the antimicrobial effectiveness of ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) to chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) on planktonic Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salivarius, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4754468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3627463 |
_version_ | 1782416026707689472 |
---|---|
author | Akca, A. Eralp Akca, Gülçin Topçu, Fulya Toksoy Macit, Enis Pikdöken, Levent Özgen, I. Şerif |
author_facet | Akca, A. Eralp Akca, Gülçin Topçu, Fulya Toksoy Macit, Enis Pikdöken, Levent Özgen, I. Şerif |
author_sort | Akca, A. Eralp |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to compare the antimicrobial effectiveness of ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) to chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) on planktonic Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salivarius, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Prevotella intermedia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Actinomyces israelii, Candida albicans, and their single-species biofilms by agar dilution and broth microdilution test methods. Both agents inhibited the growth of all planktonic species. On the other hand, CHX exhibited lower minimum bactericidal concentrations than EEP against biofilms of A. actinomycetemcomitans, S. aureus, and E. faecalis whereas EEP yielded a better result against Lactobacilli and P. intermedia. The bactericidal and fungicidal concentrations of both agents were found to be equal against biofilms of Streptecocci, P. gingivalis, A. israelii, and C. albicans. The results of this study revealed that propolis was more effective in inhibiting Gram-positive bacteria than the Gram-negative bacteria in their planktonic state and it was suggested that EEP could be as effective as CHX on oral microorganisms in their biofilm state. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4754468 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47544682016-03-06 The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study Akca, A. Eralp Akca, Gülçin Topçu, Fulya Toksoy Macit, Enis Pikdöken, Levent Özgen, I. Şerif Biomed Res Int Research Article This study aimed to compare the antimicrobial effectiveness of ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) to chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) on planktonic Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salivarius, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Prevotella intermedia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Actinomyces israelii, Candida albicans, and their single-species biofilms by agar dilution and broth microdilution test methods. Both agents inhibited the growth of all planktonic species. On the other hand, CHX exhibited lower minimum bactericidal concentrations than EEP against biofilms of A. actinomycetemcomitans, S. aureus, and E. faecalis whereas EEP yielded a better result against Lactobacilli and P. intermedia. The bactericidal and fungicidal concentrations of both agents were found to be equal against biofilms of Streptecocci, P. gingivalis, A. israelii, and C. albicans. The results of this study revealed that propolis was more effective in inhibiting Gram-positive bacteria than the Gram-negative bacteria in their planktonic state and it was suggested that EEP could be as effective as CHX on oral microorganisms in their biofilm state. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4754468/ /pubmed/26949701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3627463 Text en Copyright © 2016 A. Eralp Akca et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Akca, A. Eralp Akca, Gülçin Topçu, Fulya Toksoy Macit, Enis Pikdöken, Levent Özgen, I. Şerif The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study |
title | The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study |
title_full | The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study |
title_fullStr | The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study |
title_short | The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial effect of propolis with chlorhexidine against oral pathogens: an in vitro study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4754468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3627463 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT akcaaeralp thecomparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy AT akcagulcin thecomparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy AT topcufulyatoksoy thecomparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy AT macitenis thecomparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy AT pikdokenlevent thecomparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy AT ozgeniserif thecomparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy AT akcaaeralp comparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy AT akcagulcin comparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy AT topcufulyatoksoy comparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy AT macitenis comparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy AT pikdokenlevent comparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy AT ozgeniserif comparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy |