Cargando…

The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study

This study aimed to compare the antimicrobial effectiveness of ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) to chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) on planktonic Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salivarius, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akca, A. Eralp, Akca, Gülçin, Topçu, Fulya Toksoy, Macit, Enis, Pikdöken, Levent, Özgen, I. Şerif
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4754468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3627463
_version_ 1782416026707689472
author Akca, A. Eralp
Akca, Gülçin
Topçu, Fulya Toksoy
Macit, Enis
Pikdöken, Levent
Özgen, I. Şerif
author_facet Akca, A. Eralp
Akca, Gülçin
Topçu, Fulya Toksoy
Macit, Enis
Pikdöken, Levent
Özgen, I. Şerif
author_sort Akca, A. Eralp
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to compare the antimicrobial effectiveness of ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) to chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) on planktonic Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salivarius, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Prevotella intermedia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Actinomyces israelii, Candida albicans, and their single-species biofilms by agar dilution and broth microdilution test methods. Both agents inhibited the growth of all planktonic species. On the other hand, CHX exhibited lower minimum bactericidal concentrations than EEP against biofilms of A. actinomycetemcomitans, S. aureus, and E. faecalis whereas EEP yielded a better result against Lactobacilli and P. intermedia. The bactericidal and fungicidal concentrations of both agents were found to be equal against biofilms of Streptecocci, P. gingivalis, A. israelii, and C. albicans. The results of this study revealed that propolis was more effective in inhibiting Gram-positive bacteria than the Gram-negative bacteria in their planktonic state and it was suggested that EEP could be as effective as CHX on oral microorganisms in their biofilm state.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4754468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47544682016-03-06 The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study Akca, A. Eralp Akca, Gülçin Topçu, Fulya Toksoy Macit, Enis Pikdöken, Levent Özgen, I. Şerif Biomed Res Int Research Article This study aimed to compare the antimicrobial effectiveness of ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) to chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) on planktonic Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salivarius, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Prevotella intermedia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Actinomyces israelii, Candida albicans, and their single-species biofilms by agar dilution and broth microdilution test methods. Both agents inhibited the growth of all planktonic species. On the other hand, CHX exhibited lower minimum bactericidal concentrations than EEP against biofilms of A. actinomycetemcomitans, S. aureus, and E. faecalis whereas EEP yielded a better result against Lactobacilli and P. intermedia. The bactericidal and fungicidal concentrations of both agents were found to be equal against biofilms of Streptecocci, P. gingivalis, A. israelii, and C. albicans. The results of this study revealed that propolis was more effective in inhibiting Gram-positive bacteria than the Gram-negative bacteria in their planktonic state and it was suggested that EEP could be as effective as CHX on oral microorganisms in their biofilm state. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4754468/ /pubmed/26949701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3627463 Text en Copyright © 2016 A. Eralp Akca et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Akca, A. Eralp
Akca, Gülçin
Topçu, Fulya Toksoy
Macit, Enis
Pikdöken, Levent
Özgen, I. Şerif
The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study
title The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study
title_full The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study
title_short The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial effect of propolis with chlorhexidine against oral pathogens: an in vitro study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4754468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3627463
work_keys_str_mv AT akcaaeralp thecomparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy
AT akcagulcin thecomparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy
AT topcufulyatoksoy thecomparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy
AT macitenis thecomparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy
AT pikdokenlevent thecomparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy
AT ozgeniserif thecomparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy
AT akcaaeralp comparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy
AT akcagulcin comparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy
AT topcufulyatoksoy comparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy
AT macitenis comparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy
AT pikdokenlevent comparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy
AT ozgeniserif comparativeevaluationoftheantimicrobialeffectofpropoliswithchlorhexidineagainstoralpathogensaninvitrostudy