Improving the peer-review process and editorial quality: key errors escaping the review and editorial process in top scientific journals

We apply a novel mistake index to assess trends in the proportion of corrections published between 1993 and 2014 in Nature, Science and PNAS. The index revealed a progressive increase in the proportion of corrections published in these three high-quality journals. The index appears to be independent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Margalida, Antoni, Colomer, Mª Àngels
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2016
Materias:
Science and Medical Education
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26893961
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1670

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26893961
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1670

Ejemplares similares