Cargando…
Improving the peer-review process and editorial quality: key errors escaping the review and editorial process in top scientific journals
We apply a novel mistake index to assess trends in the proportion of corrections published between 1993 and 2014 in Nature, Science and PNAS. The index revealed a progressive increase in the proportion of corrections published in these three high-quality journals. The index appears to be independent...
Autores principales: | Margalida, Antoni, Colomer, Mª Àngels |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26893961 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1670 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Racism and censorship in the editorial and peer review process
por: Strauss, Dana, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Editorial Work and the Peer Review Economy of STS
Journals
por: Kaltenbrunner, Wolfgang, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Gender diversity of editorial boards and gender differences in the peer review process at six journals of ecology and evolution
por: Fox, Charles W., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Peer Review Process in Medical Journals
por: Cho, Young Gyu, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Role of Editorial and Peer Review Processes in Publication Bias: Analysis of Drug Trials Submitted to Eight Medical Journals
por: van Lent, Marlies, et al.
Publicado: (2014)