Cargando…
Clinical sequencing: is WGS the better WES?
Current clinical next-generation sequencing is done by using gene panels and exome analysis, both of which involve selective capturing of target regions. However, capturing has limitations in sufficiently covering coding exons, especially GC-rich regions. We compared whole exome sequencing (WES) wit...
Autores principales: | Meienberg, Janine, Bruggmann, Rémy, Oexle, Konrad, Matyas, Gabor |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4757617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26742503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00439-015-1631-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Added Value of Clinical Sequencing: WGS-Based Profiling of Pharmacogenes
por: Caspar, Sylvan M., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Accuracy benchmark of the GeneMind GenoLab M sequencing platform for WGS and WES analysis
por: Li, Chaoyang, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
WGS Revealed Novel BBS5 Pathogenic Variants, Missed by WES, Causing Ciliary Structure and Function Defects
por: Karam, Adella, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Using the Sankey diagram to visualize article features on the topics of whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) since 2012: Bibliometric analysis
por: Li, Meng-Ju, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Matched Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS) and Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) of Tumor Tissue with Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Analysis: Complementary Modalities in Clinical Practice
por: Imperial, Robin, et al.
Publicado: (2019)