Cargando…

Progression of MRI markers in cerebral small vessel disease: Sample size considerations for clinical trials

Detecting treatment efficacy using cognitive change in trials of cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) has been challenging, making the use of surrogate markers such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) attractive. We determined the sensitivity of MRI to change in SVD and used this information to calcu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benjamin, Philip, Zeestraten, Eva, Lambert, Christian, Chis Ster, Irina, Williams, Owen A, Lawrence, Andrew J, Patel, Bhavini, MacKinnon, Andrew D, Barrick, Thomas R, Markus, Hugh S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4758545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26036939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2015.113
_version_ 1782416608721895424
author Benjamin, Philip
Zeestraten, Eva
Lambert, Christian
Chis Ster, Irina
Williams, Owen A
Lawrence, Andrew J
Patel, Bhavini
MacKinnon, Andrew D
Barrick, Thomas R
Markus, Hugh S
author_facet Benjamin, Philip
Zeestraten, Eva
Lambert, Christian
Chis Ster, Irina
Williams, Owen A
Lawrence, Andrew J
Patel, Bhavini
MacKinnon, Andrew D
Barrick, Thomas R
Markus, Hugh S
author_sort Benjamin, Philip
collection PubMed
description Detecting treatment efficacy using cognitive change in trials of cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) has been challenging, making the use of surrogate markers such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) attractive. We determined the sensitivity of MRI to change in SVD and used this information to calculate sample size estimates for a clinical trial. Data from the prospective SCANS (St George’s Cognition and Neuroimaging in Stroke) study of patients with symptomatic lacunar stroke and confluent leukoaraiosis was used (n = 121). Ninety-nine subjects returned at one or more time points. Multimodal MRI and neuropsychologic testing was performed annually over 3 years. We evaluated the change in brain volume, T2 white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume, lacunes, and white matter damage on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Over 3 years, change was detectable in all MRI markers but not in cognitive measures. WMH volume and DTI parameters were most sensitive to change and therefore had the smallest sample size estimates. MRI markers, particularly WMH volume and DTI parameters, are more sensitive to SVD progression over short time periods than cognition. These markers could significantly reduce the size of trials to screen treatments for efficacy in SVD, although further validation from longitudinal and intervention studies is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4758545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47585452016-03-10 Progression of MRI markers in cerebral small vessel disease: Sample size considerations for clinical trials Benjamin, Philip Zeestraten, Eva Lambert, Christian Chis Ster, Irina Williams, Owen A Lawrence, Andrew J Patel, Bhavini MacKinnon, Andrew D Barrick, Thomas R Markus, Hugh S J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Original Articles Detecting treatment efficacy using cognitive change in trials of cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) has been challenging, making the use of surrogate markers such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) attractive. We determined the sensitivity of MRI to change in SVD and used this information to calculate sample size estimates for a clinical trial. Data from the prospective SCANS (St George’s Cognition and Neuroimaging in Stroke) study of patients with symptomatic lacunar stroke and confluent leukoaraiosis was used (n = 121). Ninety-nine subjects returned at one or more time points. Multimodal MRI and neuropsychologic testing was performed annually over 3 years. We evaluated the change in brain volume, T2 white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume, lacunes, and white matter damage on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Over 3 years, change was detectable in all MRI markers but not in cognitive measures. WMH volume and DTI parameters were most sensitive to change and therefore had the smallest sample size estimates. MRI markers, particularly WMH volume and DTI parameters, are more sensitive to SVD progression over short time periods than cognition. These markers could significantly reduce the size of trials to screen treatments for efficacy in SVD, although further validation from longitudinal and intervention studies is required. SAGE Publications 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4758545/ /pubmed/26036939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2015.113 Text en © The Author(s) 2015
spellingShingle Original Articles
Benjamin, Philip
Zeestraten, Eva
Lambert, Christian
Chis Ster, Irina
Williams, Owen A
Lawrence, Andrew J
Patel, Bhavini
MacKinnon, Andrew D
Barrick, Thomas R
Markus, Hugh S
Progression of MRI markers in cerebral small vessel disease: Sample size considerations for clinical trials
title Progression of MRI markers in cerebral small vessel disease: Sample size considerations for clinical trials
title_full Progression of MRI markers in cerebral small vessel disease: Sample size considerations for clinical trials
title_fullStr Progression of MRI markers in cerebral small vessel disease: Sample size considerations for clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Progression of MRI markers in cerebral small vessel disease: Sample size considerations for clinical trials
title_short Progression of MRI markers in cerebral small vessel disease: Sample size considerations for clinical trials
title_sort progression of mri markers in cerebral small vessel disease: sample size considerations for clinical trials
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4758545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26036939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2015.113
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminphilip progressionofmrimarkersincerebralsmallvesseldiseasesamplesizeconsiderationsforclinicaltrials
AT zeestrateneva progressionofmrimarkersincerebralsmallvesseldiseasesamplesizeconsiderationsforclinicaltrials
AT lambertchristian progressionofmrimarkersincerebralsmallvesseldiseasesamplesizeconsiderationsforclinicaltrials
AT chissteririna progressionofmrimarkersincerebralsmallvesseldiseasesamplesizeconsiderationsforclinicaltrials
AT williamsowena progressionofmrimarkersincerebralsmallvesseldiseasesamplesizeconsiderationsforclinicaltrials
AT lawrenceandrewj progressionofmrimarkersincerebralsmallvesseldiseasesamplesizeconsiderationsforclinicaltrials
AT patelbhavini progressionofmrimarkersincerebralsmallvesseldiseasesamplesizeconsiderationsforclinicaltrials
AT mackinnonandrewd progressionofmrimarkersincerebralsmallvesseldiseasesamplesizeconsiderationsforclinicaltrials
AT barrickthomasr progressionofmrimarkersincerebralsmallvesseldiseasesamplesizeconsiderationsforclinicaltrials
AT markushughs progressionofmrimarkersincerebralsmallvesseldiseasesamplesizeconsiderationsforclinicaltrials