Cargando…
Progression of MRI markers in cerebral small vessel disease: Sample size considerations for clinical trials
Detecting treatment efficacy using cognitive change in trials of cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) has been challenging, making the use of surrogate markers such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) attractive. We determined the sensitivity of MRI to change in SVD and used this information to calcu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4758545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26036939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2015.113 |
_version_ | 1782416608721895424 |
---|---|
author | Benjamin, Philip Zeestraten, Eva Lambert, Christian Chis Ster, Irina Williams, Owen A Lawrence, Andrew J Patel, Bhavini MacKinnon, Andrew D Barrick, Thomas R Markus, Hugh S |
author_facet | Benjamin, Philip Zeestraten, Eva Lambert, Christian Chis Ster, Irina Williams, Owen A Lawrence, Andrew J Patel, Bhavini MacKinnon, Andrew D Barrick, Thomas R Markus, Hugh S |
author_sort | Benjamin, Philip |
collection | PubMed |
description | Detecting treatment efficacy using cognitive change in trials of cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) has been challenging, making the use of surrogate markers such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) attractive. We determined the sensitivity of MRI to change in SVD and used this information to calculate sample size estimates for a clinical trial. Data from the prospective SCANS (St George’s Cognition and Neuroimaging in Stroke) study of patients with symptomatic lacunar stroke and confluent leukoaraiosis was used (n = 121). Ninety-nine subjects returned at one or more time points. Multimodal MRI and neuropsychologic testing was performed annually over 3 years. We evaluated the change in brain volume, T2 white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume, lacunes, and white matter damage on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Over 3 years, change was detectable in all MRI markers but not in cognitive measures. WMH volume and DTI parameters were most sensitive to change and therefore had the smallest sample size estimates. MRI markers, particularly WMH volume and DTI parameters, are more sensitive to SVD progression over short time periods than cognition. These markers could significantly reduce the size of trials to screen treatments for efficacy in SVD, although further validation from longitudinal and intervention studies is required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4758545 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47585452016-03-10 Progression of MRI markers in cerebral small vessel disease: Sample size considerations for clinical trials Benjamin, Philip Zeestraten, Eva Lambert, Christian Chis Ster, Irina Williams, Owen A Lawrence, Andrew J Patel, Bhavini MacKinnon, Andrew D Barrick, Thomas R Markus, Hugh S J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Original Articles Detecting treatment efficacy using cognitive change in trials of cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) has been challenging, making the use of surrogate markers such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) attractive. We determined the sensitivity of MRI to change in SVD and used this information to calculate sample size estimates for a clinical trial. Data from the prospective SCANS (St George’s Cognition and Neuroimaging in Stroke) study of patients with symptomatic lacunar stroke and confluent leukoaraiosis was used (n = 121). Ninety-nine subjects returned at one or more time points. Multimodal MRI and neuropsychologic testing was performed annually over 3 years. We evaluated the change in brain volume, T2 white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume, lacunes, and white matter damage on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Over 3 years, change was detectable in all MRI markers but not in cognitive measures. WMH volume and DTI parameters were most sensitive to change and therefore had the smallest sample size estimates. MRI markers, particularly WMH volume and DTI parameters, are more sensitive to SVD progression over short time periods than cognition. These markers could significantly reduce the size of trials to screen treatments for efficacy in SVD, although further validation from longitudinal and intervention studies is required. SAGE Publications 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4758545/ /pubmed/26036939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2015.113 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Benjamin, Philip Zeestraten, Eva Lambert, Christian Chis Ster, Irina Williams, Owen A Lawrence, Andrew J Patel, Bhavini MacKinnon, Andrew D Barrick, Thomas R Markus, Hugh S Progression of MRI markers in cerebral small vessel disease: Sample size considerations for clinical trials |
title | Progression of MRI markers in cerebral small vessel disease: Sample size considerations for clinical trials |
title_full | Progression of MRI markers in cerebral small vessel disease: Sample size considerations for clinical trials |
title_fullStr | Progression of MRI markers in cerebral small vessel disease: Sample size considerations for clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Progression of MRI markers in cerebral small vessel disease: Sample size considerations for clinical trials |
title_short | Progression of MRI markers in cerebral small vessel disease: Sample size considerations for clinical trials |
title_sort | progression of mri markers in cerebral small vessel disease: sample size considerations for clinical trials |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4758545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26036939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2015.113 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benjaminphilip progressionofmrimarkersincerebralsmallvesseldiseasesamplesizeconsiderationsforclinicaltrials AT zeestrateneva progressionofmrimarkersincerebralsmallvesseldiseasesamplesizeconsiderationsforclinicaltrials AT lambertchristian progressionofmrimarkersincerebralsmallvesseldiseasesamplesizeconsiderationsforclinicaltrials AT chissteririna progressionofmrimarkersincerebralsmallvesseldiseasesamplesizeconsiderationsforclinicaltrials AT williamsowena progressionofmrimarkersincerebralsmallvesseldiseasesamplesizeconsiderationsforclinicaltrials AT lawrenceandrewj progressionofmrimarkersincerebralsmallvesseldiseasesamplesizeconsiderationsforclinicaltrials AT patelbhavini progressionofmrimarkersincerebralsmallvesseldiseasesamplesizeconsiderationsforclinicaltrials AT mackinnonandrewd progressionofmrimarkersincerebralsmallvesseldiseasesamplesizeconsiderationsforclinicaltrials AT barrickthomasr progressionofmrimarkersincerebralsmallvesseldiseasesamplesizeconsiderationsforclinicaltrials AT markushughs progressionofmrimarkersincerebralsmallvesseldiseasesamplesizeconsiderationsforclinicaltrials |